Nah, I've never done NCAA. It would be the next sport I would add though, as it would just take some retooling of what I have for the NFL. I've never even looked at the NCAA page at thepredictiontracker actually, lol. Last week, because Jeff Imes had been doing well in the NFL I followed him on his top 12 NCAA plays without even looking to see how he's been doing in the NCAA, lol. I ended up making some $$$ tailing him. Good thing I only tailed him on the NCAA (I never tail anyone in the NFL, with my record why would I? lol), as he he got crushed in the NFL last week. I'm tailing him again in the NCAA this week, so we'll see what happens there.
Hey, I don't know him from Adam, lol, but sometimes I like a little action on a Saturday. Just from watching a couple of the games I tailed him on led me to make a couple of second half winning bets. Funny, but whenever I watch college games (mostly the Bowls) I've done very well at 2nd half bets by just betting whichever team looked better in the first. Simple, yet effective, lol.
BTW, I think a good 50% of the NFL systems there are as crude as stone age instruments, and I don't even know if it's the same people/systems over in the NCAA.
I find it hard to put hard-earned money on the Bungles. Do you really see Cleveland losing this one? You know it' sgoing to be a shoot out, so you know that 3 1/2 points won't matter any. And I know saying someone is "due" but Braylon Edwards is bound to break his case of the drops and starts doin his thing again real soon, and why not vs. a crappy team.
Get that $$$
<TABLE style="WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=166 border=0><COLGROUP><COL style="WIDTH: 125pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 6070" width=166><TBODY><TR style="HEIGHT: 15.95pt; mso-height-source: userset" height=21><TD class=xl64 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 15.95pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: white" width=166 height=21>HAMIL:
Cincinnati Bengals
</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15.95pt; mso-height-source: userset" height=21><TD class=xl65 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 15.95pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #eeeeee" width=166 height=21>Detroit Lions</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15.95pt; mso-height-source: userset" height=21><TD class=xl64 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 15.95pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: white" width=166 height=21>Kansas City Chiefs</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15.95pt; mso-height-source: userset" height=21><TD class=xl65 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 15.95pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #eeeeee" width=166 height=21>Cleveland Browns</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15.75pt" height=21><TD class=xl64 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 15.75pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: white" width=166 height=21>Houston Texans</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 16.5pt" height=22><TD class=xl66 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #999999 1pt solid; HEIGHT: 16.5pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #eeeeee" width=166 height=22>St. Louis Rams</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>-25-2008 07:59 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5793419" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Hamilbet</TD><TD class=alt2>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Jetplane
I'm planning on hitting these. Any of you guys think it's a bad idea?
DEN/BENGALS/ZONA/SKINS
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I find it hard to put hard-earned money on the Bungles. Do you really see Cleveland losing this one? You know it' sgoing to be a shoot out, so you know that 3 1/2 points won't matter any. And I know saying someone is "due" but Braylon Edwards is bound to break his case of the drops and starts doin his thing again real soon, and why not vs. a crappy team.
Get that $$$
My money isn't always hard-earned lol, nowadays it is since I lost so much on blackjack and SAN JOSE ST -_-. Is Braylon at 100% I thought he was injured. Anyways I have the Bengals in a pretty decent position to win. They did well vs NYG but I think it's just cuz they were overlooked... hell I even bet NYG.
The above chart is the worst 6 teams (as inclined by myself) in the NFL. Sure they Browns are only down 3 spots, but the Browns *DEFENSE* is even worse than CINCY's! I guess it's gonna go down to who's more lucky this weekend in the matchup. The clutch plays are gonna determine this.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-25-2008 05:00 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5792463" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>thecruncher</TD><TD class=alt2>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Jetplane
Imes? Hm, k. Yeah well the top ATS there is like 54 or 55% which I expected better coming from "professionals". I mean yeah it's getting by but NONE of them have gotten past 57%
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Hey, I don't know him from Adam, lol, but sometimes I like a little action on a Saturday. Just from watching a couple of the games I tailed him on led me to make a couple of second half winning bets. Funny, but whenever I watch college games (mostly the Bowls) I've done very well at 2nd half bets by just betting whichever team looked better in the first. Simple, yet effective, lol.
BTW, I think a good 50% of the NFL systems there are as crude as stone age instruments, and I don't even know if it's the same people/systems over in the NCAA.
I ended up winning my LARGE PLAY over in NCAAF tonight. I don't get to bet half's. I tried way back when and wasn't very successfull... if offshores get back up and everything is cool I might throw some money in but for now I just have to deal with "long term bets" lol.
Those NCAAF guys are weak >:\ develop something... and in the words of Morpheus: Show Me >
hehe. I dont like releasing my formulas--it can only bring bad news if it's successful and in the open.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Cincinnati Bengals
</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15.95pt; mso-height-source: userset" height=21><TD class=xl65 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 15.95pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #eeeeee" width=166 height=21>Detroit Lions</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15.95pt; mso-height-source: userset" height=21><TD class=xl64 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 15.95pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: white" width=166 height=21>Kansas City Chiefs</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15.95pt; mso-height-source: userset" height=21><TD class=xl65 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 15.95pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #eeeeee" width=166 height=21>Cleveland Browns</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15.75pt" height=21><TD class=xl64 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 15.75pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: white" width=166 height=21>Houston Texans</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 16.5pt" height=22><TD class=xl66 style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 125pt; BORDER-BOTTOM: #999999 1pt solid; HEIGHT: 16.5pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #eeeeee" width=166 height=22>St. Louis Rams</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>-25-2008 07:59 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5793419" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Hamilbet</TD><TD class=alt2>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Jetplane
I'm planning on hitting these. Any of you guys think it's a bad idea?
DEN/BENGALS/ZONA/SKINS
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I find it hard to put hard-earned money on the Bungles. Do you really see Cleveland losing this one? You know it' sgoing to be a shoot out, so you know that 3 1/2 points won't matter any. And I know saying someone is "due" but Braylon Edwards is bound to break his case of the drops and starts doin his thing again real soon, and why not vs. a crappy team.
Get that $$$
My money isn't always hard-earned lol, nowadays it is since I lost so much on blackjack and SAN JOSE ST -_-. Is Braylon at 100% I thought he was injured. Anyways I have the Bengals in a pretty decent position to win. They did well vs NYG but I think it's just cuz they were overlooked... hell I even bet NYG.
The above chart is the worst 6 teams (as inclined by myself) in the NFL. Sure they Browns are only down 3 spots, but the Browns *DEFENSE* is even worse than CINCY's! I guess it's gonna go down to who's more lucky this weekend in the matchup. The clutch plays are gonna determine this.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-25-2008 05:00 PM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5792463" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>thecruncher</TD><TD class=alt2>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Jetplane
Imes? Hm, k. Yeah well the top ATS there is like 54 or 55% which I expected better coming from "professionals". I mean yeah it's getting by but NONE of them have gotten past 57%
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Hey, I don't know him from Adam, lol, but sometimes I like a little action on a Saturday. Just from watching a couple of the games I tailed him on led me to make a couple of second half winning bets. Funny, but whenever I watch college games (mostly the Bowls) I've done very well at 2nd half bets by just betting whichever team looked better in the first. Simple, yet effective, lol.
BTW, I think a good 50% of the NFL systems there are as crude as stone age instruments, and I don't even know if it's the same people/systems over in the NCAA.
I ended up winning my LARGE PLAY over in NCAAF tonight. I don't get to bet half's. I tried way back when and wasn't very successfull... if offshores get back up and everything is cool I might throw some money in but for now I just have to deal with "long term bets" lol.
Those NCAAF guys are weak >:\ develop something... and in the words of Morpheus: Show Me >
hehe. I dont like releasing my formulas--it can only bring bad news if it's successful and in the open.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
CIN, ARI & WAS seem like great plays, Jet.
Buuut, I will continue to say DEN is a "trap" gm. Huard can steady this "O" (said "steady" not make it prolific), which should help the "D", which is young, but talented enough. Arrowhead is still one of the tougher places to play in the NFL. And DEN is 3-0, they have all the pressure on them in a heated division rivalry. KC should have no pressure at all. I see Bowe having a good day, with Gonzo chipping in. LJ should do well against a soft DEN dline. KC's "D" isn't much better, so Marshall & Royal should do well. So it's all up to KC's "D" to get adequate pressure on Cutler. And who knows, maybe they'll go after this knees!
BOL Jet, you're a great contributer to the RX.
Buuut, I will continue to say DEN is a "trap" gm. Huard can steady this "O" (said "steady" not make it prolific), which should help the "D", which is young, but talented enough. Arrowhead is still one of the tougher places to play in the NFL. And DEN is 3-0, they have all the pressure on them in a heated division rivalry. KC should have no pressure at all. I see Bowe having a good day, with Gonzo chipping in. LJ should do well against a soft DEN dline. KC's "D" isn't much better, so Marshall & Royal should do well. So it's all up to KC's "D" to get adequate pressure on Cutler. And who knows, maybe they'll go after this knees!
BOL Jet, you're a great contributer to the RX.
I originally had circled Cinncy as a possible bet.
After some digging I am having other thoughts and may just pass on this one. ( Now taking the Browns in my office pool +3.5)
Looking at the match ups and week 2 weather, these teams have caught a bad break.
Browns week 1 Vs. Dallas, Week 2 in Pittsburgh in strong winds whuich made it difficult to pass and this plays well into Pittsburgh favor. week 3 vs .tough Ravens defense.
Bengals week 1 Vs. Ravens ,week 2 Vs Titans again in strong winds and again favoring the opponents game style.week 3 VS. Giants
I think the Bengals caught a Giants squad that was more in a letdown situation then the Bengals playing good football. I think the perception that the Bengals played really good and almost beat the Giants has the Bengals a heavily backed team this week.
Both these teams have a soft defense and both like to air it out.
I think the Browns will be more focused and with Anderson almost benched he needs to have a big game.
Cinncy has one sack thus far so he should have the time to find his receivers.
The Bengals do have better talent at Q.B and as well at W.R.
After some digging I am having other thoughts and may just pass on this one. ( Now taking the Browns in my office pool +3.5)
Looking at the match ups and week 2 weather, these teams have caught a bad break.
Browns week 1 Vs. Dallas, Week 2 in Pittsburgh in strong winds whuich made it difficult to pass and this plays well into Pittsburgh favor. week 3 vs .tough Ravens defense.
Bengals week 1 Vs. Ravens ,week 2 Vs Titans again in strong winds and again favoring the opponents game style.week 3 VS. Giants
I think the Bengals caught a Giants squad that was more in a letdown situation then the Bengals playing good football. I think the perception that the Bengals played really good and almost beat the Giants has the Bengals a heavily backed team this week.
Both these teams have a soft defense and both like to air it out.
I think the Browns will be more focused and with Anderson almost benched he needs to have a big game.
Cinncy has one sack thus far so he should have the time to find his receivers.
The Bengals do have better talent at Q.B and as well at W.R.
RECAP: So, why are the Browns better than the Bengals? Because they actually try hard! Sure, Cincinnati showed up last week, but I feel as though that happened because the players felt disrespected being a 13-point underdog. Plus, it didn't help that the Giants were flat.
I have to believe that Cleveland will be the more desperate team here. The Browns were projected to be a playoff team, while the Bengals, who don't care about winning, are supposed to suck. Siding against the public is also a pretty lucrative move.
A cool trend: Romeo Crennel has never failed to cover in the final contest of a two-game road trip. He's 6-0 against the spread in this situation.
I have to believe that Cleveland will be the more desperate team here. The Browns were projected to be a playoff team, while the Bengals, who don't care about winning, are supposed to suck. Siding against the public is also a pretty lucrative move.
A cool trend: Romeo Crennel has never failed to cover in the final contest of a two-game road trip. He's 6-0 against the spread in this situation.
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>-26-2008 10:53 AM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5796009" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>sds23</TD><TD class=alt2>Good stuff Jet. BOL this weekend buddy!
Thanks buddy, I'll see you in MAC's. Somehow I went f*ckin 2-2... i got owned by a backdoor, I'm making my way back up to the top.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-26-2008 05:47 AM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5795560" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>The Shambler</TD><TD class=alt2>RECAP: So, why are the Browns better than the Bengals? Because they actually try hard! Sure, Cincinnati showed up last week, but I feel as though that happened because the players felt disrespected being a 13-point underdog. Plus, it didn't help that the Giants were flat.
I have to believe that Cleveland will be the more desperate team here. The Browns were projected to be a playoff team, while the Bengals, who don't care about winning, are supposed to suck. Siding against the public is also a pretty lucrative move.
A cool trend: Romeo Crennel has never failed to cover in the final contest of a two-game road trip. He's 6-0 against the spread in this situation.
----------------
Thanks for the heads up! I really do appreciate the info. But one system says -4... another says -5.2 so I have to trust in myself that it works. Yes I am afraid of the atrocious Bengal D but even on a bad day--how did NYG barely beat them???
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Thanks buddy, I'll see you in MAC's. Somehow I went f*ckin 2-2... i got owned by a backdoor, I'm making my way back up to the top.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>09-26-2008 05:47 AM</TD></TR><TR title="Post 5795560" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>The Shambler</TD><TD class=alt2>RECAP: So, why are the Browns better than the Bengals? Because they actually try hard! Sure, Cincinnati showed up last week, but I feel as though that happened because the players felt disrespected being a 13-point underdog. Plus, it didn't help that the Giants were flat.
I have to believe that Cleveland will be the more desperate team here. The Browns were projected to be a playoff team, while the Bengals, who don't care about winning, are supposed to suck. Siding against the public is also a pretty lucrative move.
A cool trend: Romeo Crennel has never failed to cover in the final contest of a two-game road trip. He's 6-0 against the spread in this situation.
----------------
Thanks for the heads up! I really do appreciate the info. But one system says -4... another says -5.2 so I have to trust in myself that it works. Yes I am afraid of the atrocious Bengal D but even on a bad day--how did NYG barely beat them???
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
