Bad loser day yesterday, for about -5%.
--------------------------------
I am stopping posting any more this system.
Not because yesterday -it's last day, was a loser one, this has nothing to do with.
This system is working, in exactly 1 month has picked up about +20% on the bankroll.
I have 2 serious reasons to not go any further:
- It's extremely time consuming.
Takes 3 solid hours of work each day, and simply I do not have the time needed to do this. It takes so many math operations I need to do "by hand" you hardly can imagine, and these can not be done by the computer.
The part of introducing some data about every of the last 5-6 games of each team plus about starter pitchers is one thing, but this is not the main time consuming element. Based upon these data the program spits me out the "strength to date of the team", but giving me 2 different sets for each of the 30 teams. Different sets because I'm introducing sets of data compiled in 2 sets of capping criteria, which are too different to be merged in a single one.
So I have for each and every team 2 "strength" values before each game.
We have 30 teams total, and so I have 60 of these values, which I call "threads" of each team, and these are practically 60 Labby Lines.
Many of you know I really like Labby lines, and I think if there is any kind of progressive money management to be used in betting, then the Labbys are the only way to go.
The problem, the time consuming math part is before all games on the board to combine the 4 Labbys of the teams involved in any game - the 2-2 Labbys for each team, which operation gives me the side to pick and the final % value for the wager.
- There is a nonsense about the wager values:
Because the way I run the Labby lines, the smallest wager is 0.1% to win, and the biggest one 3.5% to win.
I look for a long time at this, and if I'm honest with myself I know from the very beginning that no matter if these values are resulting from religiously following the math of the Labby lines, but this is a huge nonsense.... When between the size of the wagers is a difference of one being 35 times stronger than the other, that makes all the 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3% and even 0.4% wagers meaningless compared to the around 3% ones.
In fact I had too many days when the W / L record is much positive, but there were big losing days, because almost all small wagers were winners and almost all big wagers were losers. Of course many times happened the opposite too, but these outcomes are reducing drastically the importance of the different % value of the wagers.
