Browns+7 WIN//// Jags +3/LOSE// Chiefs -9//LOSE// Redskins + 7 1/2WIN [ Upset of the week] Pats -5 1st half /WIN//// Could be press? LOST COULD NOT PRESS with Chiefs -9 to the Pats -5 1st half ? we are looking at a 4 to 5 margin win with these bets however we have different amounts on our bets here. Using System Smitty Ryann Jr. percentage point !!!! spread analysis. Press is another option ? on late game with the pats-5 1st half WINS 3 OUT 5??? Money lines Lose to chiefs& Jags//// Won with NE Not bad, not good either as money goes/ /// Had more money bet on chiefs& Little less money on NE AND LITTLE LESS ON JAGS. 3 OUT 5 ON STRAGHT BETS PUT IS IN + MARGIN THAT HELPED OVERCOME SOME OF OUR LOSES... BUT WE GETTING THERE WITH SOME POSTIVE NOTES AFTER WEEK 2 & 3 AND 4 ... the 1 St week was good winner so.. we have still have 12 weeks ago in reg. season , so lot things on positive side could happen? As far J.J. POWER RATING ITS STILL SOLID AND WILL GET BETTER EVERY WEEK WITH MORE STATS, PERCENTAGES TO WORK WITH USING THE 5 WEEKS. [we will count our chips at the end of season with long way ago]... SO BE IT !!!!
NFL is lot tougher on plays this year from last year in our option with the crew. Sharp action has not done particularly well so far in the NFL this season either. We are defiantly going bet the Monday night game this week, but not trying to get even from week 5 bets or play catch-up either. We like Pittsburgh + 3 1/2 as our bet against San Diego at home. We are also considering the money line bet +160[ we will decide to make M/L bet around game time and see $ line moves in our favor. Note. We have already made the bet at +3 1/2 not yet on M/L
Hårr¥THëHÄT
Well, I neglected to include the ML plays in Harry's slate I formatted and posted upstream because of the phrase "we as a crew."
In other words, Harry was part of a collective ML bet for the following. What was his portion of the collective bet? :think2:
13* Kansas City ML
2* Jacksonville ML
3* New England ML
note: * = $
We were supposed to intuitively interpret that the "$" symbol from Harry's statement above meant how many units or how large of a bet was made.
In other words, the Kansas City "crew collective" ML play was 13X the normal 1X amount.
Also, we do not know what the ML values were at the time the bets were made.
The consensus closing ML values were the following:
Kansas City ML -428
Jacksonville ML -105
New England ML -400
Needless to say, it was a unmitigated bloodbath for the crew on the "collective" ML plays because both Kansas City and Jacksonville shit the bed.
We just don't know what percentage Harry had with his initial investment in this common ML play pot.
However, we all know how Harry did on his individual straight bets. Respectable 3-2 ATS.
Anyway, I realize many members are struggling to harvest Harry's plays from his lengthy posts.
It's painfully evident these threads are an imbroglio.
!/we do not play units on money lines that was just lucky 13 added for luck. What is your problem w/l record with our crew and me? Also posted our W/L record why? You can evaluate our record by our picks and bets that i posted on this thread. I also posted our W/L record this week on this tread also. Again you are trying to judge our record and value of our bets[ money we bet on each game no business of yours. I don,t go on other members threads and do what you are doing of a arepetitious matter. Just by some of your replys it seems to me you have idiosyncrasy behavior toward our crew and me. You should spend more time on your own w/l record on your own thread. You are really starting piss me off[excuse my language ] do me favor stay off my thread that i post with your stupid comments. You catch my drift !!!!!!well, i neglected to include the ml plays in harry's slate i formatted and posted upstream because of the phrase "we as a crew."
in other words, harry was part of a collective ml bet for the following. What was his portion of the collective bet? :think2:
13* kansas city ml
2* jacksonville ml
3* new england ml
note: * = $
we were supposed to intuitively interpret that the "$" symbol from harry's statement above meant how many units or how large of a bet was made.
In other words, the kansas city "crew collective" ml play was 13x the normal 1x amount.
Also, we do not know what the ml values were at the time the bets were made.
The consensus closing ml values were the following:
Kansas city ml -428
jacksonville ml -105
new england ml -400
needless to say, it was a unmitigated bloodbath for the crew on the "collective" ml plays because both kansas city and jacksonville shit the bed.
We just don't know what percentage harry had with his initial investment in this common ml play pot.
However, we all know how harry did on his individual straight bets. Respectable 3-2 ats.
Anyway, i realize many members are struggling to harvest harry's plays from his lengthy posts.
It's painfully evident these threads are an imbroglio.
The man just took a hit, and you guys have the courage to come in bash and insults him? Have some common sense, and courtesy for God's sake. Would you please if people come in your thread week in/out and questioning you why did you pick those lost picks? I don't know about you guys, but I would be pissed as F. Grow the F up.
I appreciate every members here at RXs who provide many insights, infos and wisdom not just Harry here. I'm tired of every week coming into Harry's thread and seeing the same BS every time, I don't see that happening at other member threads who also having a losing streaks. It's call gambling for a reason....it happens.
I don't side with everyone here, but a little of common sense and courtesy goes a long way. BOL to everyone on MNF and the rest of the season.
I appreciate every members here at RXs who provide many insights, infos and wisdom not just Harry here. I'm tired of every week coming into Harry's thread and seeing the same BS every time, I don't see that happening at other member threads who also having a losing streaks. It's call gambling for a reason....it happens.
I don't side with everyone here, but a little of common sense and courtesy goes a long way. BOL to everyone on MNF and the rest of the season.
Well, I neglected to include the ML plays in Harry's slate I formatted and posted upstream because of the phrase "we as a crew."
In other words, Harry was part of a collective ML bet for the following. What was his portion of the collective bet? :think2:
13* Kansas City ML
2* Jacksonville ML
3* New England ML
note: * = $
We were supposed to intuitively interpret that the "$" symbol from Harry's statement above meant how many units or how large of a bet was made.
In other words, the Kansas City "crew collective" ML play was 13X the normal 1X amount.
Also, we do not know what the ML values were at the time the bets were made.
The consensus closing ML values were the following:
Kansas City ML -428
Jacksonville ML -105
New England ML -400
Needless to say, it was a unmitigated bloodbath for the crew on the "collective" ML plays because both Kansas City and Jacksonville shit the bed.
We just don't know what percentage Harry had with his initial investment in this common ML play pot.
However, we all know how Harry did on his individual straight bets. Respectable 3-2 ATS.
Anyway, I realize many members are struggling to harvest Harry's plays from his lengthy posts.
It's painfully evident these threads are an imbroglio.
Last Word Charlie. Yup, what a dick.
U guys came to some conclusion that the $ signs meant units on the moneyline then say it was a bloodbath? Really? When did he ever say anything about bet size or units ever? Stop making shit up. And the guy went 3-2 ats. Forget the moneyelines aND trying to factor in how much he won loss on those. It doesn't matter. Give it a rest already.
Harry, I'm definitely not trying to "judge" your record or the value of your bets. I was trying to decipher and understand what weight you placed on the communal ML plays. That's all. The ML values I subjectively placed on each ML play was retrieved from Scores&Odds. You never listed the ML values, so that's where I went.
The fact is the majority of Rx members who come into your threads feel you post your research and plays in hieroglyphics. They have trouble figuring what the hell you and your "crew" are saying and/or playing. Many here are blindly following your plays for whatever reason, so shouldn't they know with 100% certainty what you're playing? That's not stupid question, but rather a fundamental and innocuous one.
Did you notice at least a half dozen members thank me for putting your play list on a more reader friendly format? Their comments are clearly posted upstream. Those posters were grateful they no no longer have to break out their secret decoder rings to figure out what the hell you and your crew are playing. I didn't enlist them to write those comments. They did so on their own volition. I'm certain there are many lurkers who also appreciate my formatting of your plays. We're here to help one another, so I feel there's a benefit and utility involved for everyone. There's no malice intended whatsoever. That's a misconception on your part.
Anyway, I apologize you're pissed off at me for trying to help others who come into your thread. I believe it's misdirected frustration from what's happened to you and the crew on the gridiron the last several weeks. Things will hopefully turn around for you and the crew now that we're a just a shade past a quarter of the season.
Best of luck to you going forward from this point on. :toast:
I was stating the "$" symbol" could be equated to the "*" symbol. Since there were 13 $ signs with the Kansas City ML, without a clear explanation, this would be reasonable to assume there was greater weight placed on it than the 2 $ signs for Jacksonville ML play and 3 $ signs for the New England ML play.
All of these 3 ML plays played were of equal importance and weight? Okie dokie.
Not sure what is so hard about staying off someone threads if don't like it. I'm sure most people on here can discern for themselves who they should follow or not. Some people just have too much time on their hands to go through people thread to keep track and bash (when losing).
I, for one, appreciate the information Harry posts as extra resources. Not necessary follow blindly.
Some of you need to change your nick to mine. LOL
I, for one, appreciate the information Harry posts as extra resources. Not necessary follow blindly.
Some of you need to change your nick to mine. LOL
