It just keeps getting better and better: Trump claims not to know who David Duke is

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
31BFA16E00000578-0-image-m-35_1456874742291.jpg

  • SHARE PICTURE


+2



I'm in: Trump confirmed his attendance at the debate moderated by Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, ending a boycott going back to their feud in August last year



[h=1]Donald Trump WILL take part in debate hosted by Megyn Kelly - despite long-running feud with Fox News anchor[/h]
  • Republican contenders will debate on Thursday night in Detroit at event moderated by Megyn Kelly
  • Trump campaign tells Daily Mail Online he will take part, despite long-running feud between him and Kelly
  • They clashed at first Fox News debate and he was later accused of misogyny for saying there was 'blood coming out of her - wherever'
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
S'up old timer, got any more 70's style jargon, "jack shit" is a classic. Next time try to mix "jive turkey" in a sentence. Better yet, check out TV Land and watch Good Times and do what JJ does. If you can't stay up that late, What's Happening is on, ReRun, Dwayne and Raj could give you some new cool terms...Disco Dafinch

Listen you stupid, bestiality loving, child porn fanatic, ignorant, fat bastard, you don't exactly have Secretariat running this fall. Your carpet munching candidate isn't exactly a guaranteed lock. When the hammer falls she will do what the Clintons do....scorched earth policy. You see, it is her turn and no one is going to get in the way. They will bring down anyone that tries to get in their way, including the entire Democratic Party...it's the Clinton way. The bitch is dirty and everyone knows it and this thing is far from over you fucking pedophile.

Bring down the entire Democratic Party? Wtf are you babbling about, was there a Presidential election that Bill lost that I missed, asshole? I'd be the first to admit, and have said more than once, that she's no bargain, but compared to those jagoffs in the GOP, she looks like FDR, and we'll see who brings down whom, you worthless pig fucker. Run along and do what many in both Virginias are adept at doing...fucking their relatives. Loser!@#0cockingasnook()azzkick(&^:pointer:kth)(&^Slapping-silly90)):bigfinger:trx-smly0:kissingbb:Countdown
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens

What's the matter, Scumbag? No snappy comeback to post # 63 in this thread, where I bitch slapped you in showing what a lying moron you are? Hey, how many attended the 'Bama speech by Boy Blunder? Haven't heard you brag about him funding 70% of his campaign lately(which, while way more than anybody else, falls a wee bit short of the 100% that he claimed), why is that?:think2:Loser!@#0:pointer:kth)(&^
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
Bring down the entire Democratic Party? Wtf are you babbling about, was there a Presidential election that Bill lost that I missed, asshole? I'd be the first to admit, and have said more than once, that she's no bargain, but compared to those jagoffs in the GOP, she looks like FDR, and we'll see who brings down whom, you worthless pig fucker. Run along and do what many in both Virginias are adept at doing...fucking their relatives. Loser!@#0cockingasnook()azzkick(&^:pointer:kth)(&^Slapping-silly90)):bigfinger:trx-smly0:kissingbb:Countdown

You fat, stupid, ignorant bastard. You are so blinded by misery and hate that you don't realize that when the history books are written, the two things Clinton will be know for are impeachment and being a sexual predator. Economy? Coolidge and Harding rank higher but don't feel bad, Andrew Johnson was impeached before William Jefferson Clinton. Too bad Clinton had to ruin so many lives and his legacy will be impeachment.

Now fuck off you old, angry,frustrated piece of shit. Pick on someone your own age you loser
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
You fat, stupid, ignorant bastard. You are so blinded by misery and hate that you don't realize that when the history books are written, the two things Clinton will be know for are impeachment and being a sexual predator. Economy? Coolidge and Harding rank higher but don't feel bad, Andrew Johnson was impeached before William Jefferson Clinton. Too bad Clinton had to ruin so many lives and his legacy will be impeachment.

Now fuck off you old, angry,frustrated piece of shit. Pick on someone your own age you loser
Huh?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
You fat, stupid, ignorant bastard. You are so blinded by misery and hate that you don't realize that when the history books are written, the two things Clinton will be know for are impeachment and being a sexual predator. Economy? Coolidge and Harding rank higher but don't feel bad, Andrew Johnson was impeached before William Jefferson Clinton. Too bad Clinton had to ruin so many lives and his legacy will be impeachment.

Now fuck off you old, angry,frustrated piece of shit. Pick on someone your own age you loser

To say your historical perspective is delusional is putting it mildly. I brought up 3 polls and his ranking ranges from 8 to 14, comfortably in the top 3rd. I'll take their word over that off a brain dead cocksucker like you. Now, run along and lay big pipe with Mama Hillbilly...:bigfinger:devilex::fckmad::bunnies::madasshol:tongue2::kissingbb:flies:

http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/...anks-high-in-new-historical-presidents-study/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ln-1-obama-18-kennedy-judged-most-over-rated/

http://www.rantpolitical.com/2015/03/27/ranking-every-u-s-president-from-worst-to-first/
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
Pathetic, isn't it? He doesn't have a fucking clue. I think he thinks being impeached is the same as being convicted-and, hey, Nixon wasn't actually impeached, right?

Dumbass is feeling a little cocky because he gets some reassurance for one of the few times in his life.

I do know that history will show that he was impeached, only the second president in history. I doubt 4th graders 50 years from now will give a shit about the Senate vote. They will know that Clinton was a sexual predator who was impeached. The Clinton's represent politics at the lowest level and they will go down in history so noted.

You talk more shit than anyone on this site. The reality is you are a scared little pussy and make up for your inadequacies with your key strokes. I know people like you in real life and be thankful I am nowhere near Vegas you nasty mother fucker
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Dumbass is feeling a little cocky because he gets some reassurance for one of the few times in his life.

I do know that history will show that he was impeached, only the second president in history. I doubt 4th graders 50 years from now will give a shit about the Senate vote. They will know that Clinton was a sexual predator who was impeached. The Clinton's represent politics at the lowest level and they will go down in history so noted.

You talk more shit than anyone on this site. The reality is you are a scared little pussy and make up for your inadequacies with your key strokes. I know people like you in real life and be thankful I am nowhere near Vegas you nasty mother fucker

Like I said, I provided multiple lists, from different respected sources, who've ranked Slick Willie quite highly, as opposed to the view of a knuckle dragging mouth breathing, inbred cocksucker. And, I notice that you carefully avoided addressing the lists that I provided, I wonder why? Furthermore, who gives a shit about "4th graders 50 years from now," you fucking idiot? Plus, it's amazing how people who gripe about "internet tough guys" are too fucking stupid to realize that that they are guilty of the same thing that they are complaining about-I should be thankful that you're nowhere near me? Why? Because YOU have the ability to figure how tough somebody who you don't know is by what they say on an internet? Don't you realize how stupid that sounds???? You ain't gonna do SHIT, go fuck your mother while you blow your father, Hillbilly. :bigfinger:devilex::fckmad::bunnies::madasshol:tongue2::kissingbb:flies:
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
[h=1]Super Tuesday: the major takeaways from a big night for Trump and Clinton[/h]


Here’s what we learned after 12 states and one US territory cast their votes for the Republican and Democratic presidential nominations Tuesday night


Super Tuesday is over – notwithstanding a lot of delegate math left to be done, and that tardy Alaska caucuses result still undecided.

  • Donald Trump is not the Republican nominee ... yet.
  • Nevertheless, it was a big night for the New York billionaire, and for Hillary Clinton. They won seven states each, picked up armloads of delegates and advanced their respective claims on their parties’ presidential nominations.
  • It’s not over yet. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders’s four state victories keep the race alive, and on the Republican side Ted Cruz’s big win in Texas and second win in Oklahoma do the same.
  • Florida senator Marco Rubio had a tough night. He won only one state – Minnesota – and fell short of the 20% minimum needed to earn delegates in Texas, Alabama and Vermont. He appeared to fall 100+ delegates behind Cruz.
  • Rubio vowed to fight on, telling supporters the race was in its early stages and he would start to clean up later this month.
  • Our comprehensive results page is here. (This isn’t something we learned tonight but this seems like a good place to mention it.)
  • Clinton profited from giant 60- to 80-point margins among African American voters across the South.
  • What about Ben Carson and John Kasich? Kasich came in second in Vermont. Carson was in contention nowhere. Kasich called on Rubio to drop out and Carson said: “I will remain.”
  • The races could resolve dramatically in the next two weeks. Nine states host contests between now and 15 March, when the contests suddenly become winner-take-all and crucial states, including Florida, Ohio and North Carolina, will vote.
  • As for color, there was a strange Trump victory-rally-slash-press-conference that ran interminably long. What made it strange was New Jersey governor Chris Christie, who endorsed Trump last Friday, and introduced him and then stood behind him the whole time. But the look on Christie’s face was one of doom.





 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
31C17E5800000578-3472480-image-a-2_1456900776771.jpg



[h=1]‘I’m a unifier’: Donald Trump insists the Republican Party should get behind him as he basks in his Super Tuesday victories at press conference in gold-drenched room of his oceanfront estate[/h]
  • Front-runner wins a majority of state primaries and caucuses and ends the night with a press conference, not a victory party
  • Trump hammered Marco Rubio for being 'hostile' and congratulated Ted Cruz for the hard work it took to win his home state of Texas
  • 'I'm a unifier,' he told journalists, high-society rubberneckers and a global TV audience; 'I know people are going to find that a little hard to believe'
  • Also hit on a general election strategy against Hillary Clinton, saying she and Barack Obama have had years to fix problems she notes in speeches

 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
31C1982200000578-3472480-image-a-10_1456900480814.jpg

  • SHARE PICTURE


+6




Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump, basking in the glow of his Super Tuesday victories, pledged that he would bring the GOP together while preparing to do battle with Hillary Clinton in the fall

31C1775700000578-3472480-image-a-4_1456900822848.jpg


+6



Tuesday night's Trump show was an event in a category of its own: an election victory lap with no voters in attendance. The public wasn't invited





.


In a packed recital hall at his ornate south Florida oceanfront estate Mar-a-Lago, Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump basked in the glow of his Super Tuesday victories and pledged that he would bring the GOP together while preparing to do battle with Hillary Clinton in the fall.
'I'm a unifier,' he told more than 100 journalists, dozens of high-society rubberneckers and a global television audience during a press conference that required most of the day to engineer.
'I know people are going to find that a little hard to believe.'
'I think we're going to be more inclusive, I think we're going to be more unified, and I think we're going to win in November,' Trump said while camera shutters clicked and reporters competed for the chance to ask questions.




In the space of a half-hour, the billionaire whose unlikely White House run has captivated global media markets and spawned a thousand late-night monologue jokes recast himself as the party's one hope, and made his case that the Republican National Committee – long a calibrated roadblock – has no business standing in his way.
'I don't know that I've been treated fairly or not,' he said of the RNC. 'What I really have is a great number of people. I have millions and millions of people.'




Marveling at the surge of energy his candidacy has substituted for the lethargy that turned Mitt Romney and John McCain into election losers in 2012 and 2008, Trump said during a press conference that winning most of the day's primaries and caucuses should be proof enough that he's for real.
'If I'm going to win all of these states with tremendous numbers ... I think, you know, we're a democracy. I think it's awfully hard to say that's not the person we want to lead the party,' he told Dailymail.com during the media spectacle.





With him as the political world's Greatest Show On Earth, he argued, 'the Republican Party has become more dynamic. It's become more diverse. We're taking from the Democrats. We're taking from the independents. We have a lot more people.'
But even as he struck a combative tone with the Republican Party, he made efforts to dissolve his image as a swashbuckling china-shop bull.
Claiming that he gets his political news in equal parts from CNN, Fox News and MSNBC, he grinned. 'See?' Trump said. 'I'm becoming diplomatic.'
Tuesday night's Trump show was an event in a category of its own: an election victory lap with no voters in attendance. The public wasn't invited.
Instead it had the feel of a White House press conference held in the East Room, with equal parts gravitas, gold leaf and glittering chandeliers.
Trump used his gilded podium to offer congratulations to Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who ended the night with wins in his home state of Texas and in neighboring Arkansas.
'I do congratulate Ted Cruz because I know how hard Ted worked in Texas,' Trump said of the man who went from being 'my good friend' to 'lying Ted' as his stock rose in opinion polls.
But in the next breath he flayed another young senator, Marco Rubio of Florida, for a poor showing that would net him few delegates and only a single state-level victory in Minnesota.
'I always liked Marco until about a week ago when he decided to go hostile,' Trump said, reflecting on a week filled with caustic attacks at Rubio's hands.





'He decided to become Don Rickles, okay? But Don Rickles has a lot more talent.'
Trump, as usual, held the mass media in the palm of his hand, playing the role of a political Svengali who believes he has already won the Republican nomination but needs help to actually make it so.
Focusing his rhetorical guns on the Democrats' front-runner made the sales pitch stick.
'Once we get all of this finished I'm going to go after Hillary Clinton, on the assumption she's allowed to run, which is a big assumption,' he said.
In the process of bashing the former secretary of state for the legal jeopardy associated with an FBI investigation into classified documents found on her private email server – 'What she did was a criminal act!' – Trump articulated for the first time what might be a winning general election argument.
'People in the middle income groups are making less money today – less money! – than they made 12 years ago,' he observed.
But in Clinton's election-night speech, Trump said, she limited herself to merely observing that 'They're making less money.'
'Well, she's been there with Obama for a long period of time. Why hasn't she done anything about it?' he thundered.





Answering a question about how he could coax minority voters under the GOP's tent, he made it sound like a foregone conclusion.
'We're gonna bring 'em back. We're gonna bring 'em back,' Trump said.
'First of all, we're going to do great with the African-Americans.'
he also pledged to 'do great with the Hispanics.'
'I'm going to do great with virtually every group,' he said. 'The reason is I'm going to bring jobs back.'
One group who may require an extraordinary level of persuasion are the Republican Party bosses who blanch at the thought of a coarse-talking former reality television star as their standard-bearer.
'I have a lot of respect for Reince and the group,' he said, referring to RNC Chairman Reince Priebus.
But he also hinted that he expects credit where credit is due.
'The Republicans have tremendous energy. The Democrats don't,' Trump said calmly.
'Their numbers are down. Our numbers are through the roof.'


 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trumps-racial-controversies-leave-gop-awkward-spot

[h=1]Trump’s racial controversies leave GOP in awkward spot[/h]02/29/16 08:00 AM



facebook twitter 6 save share group 93


By Steve Benen
It was just a few days ago that Donald Trump, pressed to respond to support from former KKK leader David Duke, told reporters, ”I didn’t even know he endorsed me. David Duke endorsed me? I disavow, OK?”

Yesterday, however, Trump was asked again about support from overt racists, and this time, the Republican presidential candidate’s line grew murky.
In an interview Sunday morning, GOP front-runner Donald Trump would not condemn former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard David Duke’s support for his presidential campaign, telling CNN host Jake Tapper on “State of the Union” that he has no knowledge of the white supremacist leader.

“Just so you understand, I don’t know anything about David Duke, okay? I don’t know anything about what you’re even talking about with white supremacy or white supremacists. So I don’t know, did he endorse me or what’s going on,” Trump said.
Asked about his willingness to condemn white supremacists, Trump was hardly unequivocal. “Well, I have to look at the group,” he told Jake Tapper. “I mean, I don’t know what group you’re talking about. You wouldn’t want me to condemn a group that I know nothing about. I have to look. If you would send me a list of the groups I will do research on them and certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong. But you may have groups in there that are totally fine and it would be very unfair. So give me a list of the groups and I’ll let you know.”

Not surprisingly, the exchange prompted yet another round of “Will this sink Trump’s campaign?” speculation, and it wasn’t long before the GOP candidate’s rivals were publicly criticizing Trump’s apparent reluctance to denounce his white-supremacist allies.

In a year like this one, guessing how conservative voters might respond to various developments is increasingly difficult. That said, it’s important to understand the degree to which the Republican Party is in an exceedingly awkward position.


At a Virginia event yesterday, for example, Marco Rubio was eager to denounce Trump’s latest racially charged controversy. And who was introducing Rubio on the campaign trail yesterday? That would be none other than Virginia’s former governor and senator, George Allen (R), whose career was cut short in the wake of his own racially charged controversy.

What’s more, while Trump evidently no longer knows what to say about David Duke, let’s also not forget that Louisiana’s Steve Scalise spoke at an event for white supremacists several years ago and described himself as “David Duke without the baggage.” House Republicans nevertheless made Steve Scalise the House Majority Whip – the #3 position in the House GOP leadership – and largely failed to even criticize him after the public learned about Scalise’s past.

More to the point, Trump’s most notable contribution to the political discourse – before his racially charged rhetoric as a presidential candidate – was his leadership role in the “birther” conspiracy theory, which, at its core, was racist nonsense. Republican leaders not only failed to denounce Trump’s ridiculous crusade, they also publicly welcomed his support and endorsements, Trump’s “birtherism” notwithstanding.

With this in mind, isn’t it a little late for GOP officials and candidates to wring their hands and claim the high ground? Had Republicans been consistent all along – removing Scalise from his leadership post, denouncing the “birther” garbage from the outset, etc. – the party would likely be in a more credible position now, but that point passed long ago.


Postscript: On a related note, Rachel has an incredibly well-timed piece in the Washington Post that you’re going to want to check out: What does it say about the GOP that Trump is the white supremacists’ candidate?”




 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Ahhh, cancelled rallies because of Nazi-lie supporters in Chicago. Good to see they arrested that gutless old cocksucker who sucker punched the protest last night. In '68 at the Convention, the protesters chanted, "the whole world's watching!" and the party that held that convention didn't fare will in the fall. The rest of Drumph's rallies should prove...interesting. Next time they may have to kill him, whatta scumbag...http://www.insideedition.com/headli...protester-next-time-we-might-have-to-kill-him
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
Ahhh, cancelled rallies because of Nazi-lie supporters in Chicago. Good to see they arrested that gutless old cocksucker who sucker punched the protest last night. In '68 at the Convention, the protesters chanted, "the whole world's watching!" and the party that held that convention didn't fare will in the fall.The rest of Drumph's rallies should prove...interesting. Next time they may have to kill him, whatta scumbag...http://www.insideedition.com/headli...protester-next-time-we-might-have-to-kill-him

You do realize that the bloody 1968 convention held in Chicago was the Democratic Convention and that fall Richard Nixon defeated Humphrey in a landslide.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
Ahhh, cancelled rallies because of Nazi-lie supporters in Chicago. Good to see they arrested that gutless old cocksucker who sucker punched the protest last night. In '68 at the Convention, the protesters chanted, "the whole world's watching!" and the party that held that convention didn't fare will in the fall. The rest of Drumph's rallies should prove...interesting. Next time they may have to kill him, whatta scumbag...http://www.insideedition.com/headli...protester-next-time-we-might-have-to-kill-him

You do realize that the bloody 1968 convention held in Chicago was the Democratic Convention and that fall Richard Nixon defeated Humphrey in a landslide.


I didn't think so. You are so fucking stupid it isn't funny. How you can continue to show up in this place after you are completely humiliated is beyond me.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
You do realize that the bloody 1968 convention held in Chicago was the Democratic Convention and that fall Richard Nixon defeated Humphrey in a landslide.

First of all, of COURSE, I know the result, that's why I said the party "and the party that held that convention didn't fare will in the fall, you fucking idiot. And, Nixon won 43.4% of the vote, Humphrey 42.7% if you call that a "landslide," you're even a bigger fucking moron that I thought you were.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,986
Messages
13,589,863
Members
101,039
Latest member
gammemoi303
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com