ISIS is now the Fourth Reich

[SheriffJoe]

I've said this many time............Saddam may have been crazy, and I don't condone a lot of things he did. But, at least, there was law and order in Iraq and most of the region during his rule. There was no ISIS or Al Queida, at least not like today. We did create most of the turmoil around today. The same may be said about Libya and what we did there.

"law and order in Iraq" :neenee:

Does gassing your own people fit that bill?

Apparently you're too young to remember the Gulf war and how coalition forces had to drive "Stabilizing Saddam" out of Kuwait, as well as the subsequent military action by President Clinton all through the 90s. You also probably don't remember Israel having to bomb Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor....too far back for the libtard blogosphere.

"Stabilizing force in the region" face)(*^% - the guy was a constant nuisance some military always had to deal with.

In 1991, Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf said his troops were 100 miles from Baghdad awaiting orders to finish the job.

That's all George W. Bush did - finish the job (12 years too late)

 

[duckhunter]

"law and order in Iraq" :neenee:

Does gassing your own people fit that bill?

Apparently you're too young to remember the Gulf war and how coalition forces had to drive "Stabilizing Saddam" out of Kuwait, as well as the subsequent military action by President Clinton all through the 90s. You also probably don't remember Israel having to bomb Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor.

"Stabilizing force in the region" face)(*^% - the guy was a constant nuisance some military always had to deal with.

In 1991, Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf said his troops were 100 miles from Baghdad awaiting orders to finish the job.

That's all George W. Bush did - finish the job (12 years too late)

One question for you.............Is the situation in Iraq better now or was it better under Saddam. Don't fool yourself..............most of the things that went on were none of our business. He never did anything to hurt US interests.

 

[The Guesser]

"law and order in Iraq" :neenee:

Does gassing his own people fit that bill?

Apparently you're too young to remember the Gulf war and how coalition forces had to drive "Stabilizing Saddam" out of Kuwait, as well as the subsequent military action by President Clinton all through the 90s. You also probably don't remember Israel having to bomb Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor....too far back for the libtard blogosphere.

"Stabilizing force in the region" face)(*^% - the guy was a constant nuisance some military always had to deal with.

In 1991, Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf said his troops were 100 miles from Baghdad awaiting orders to finish the job.

That's all George W. Bush did - finish the job (12 years too late)

Pappy Bush was smart enough to know when and how to end a war, and not overstep. Our mission was to get Iraq out of Kuwait. Mission accomplished, and we left. Pity his dumb ass son wasn't, and unfortunately, because he wasn't, we have the Middle East we have today.

 

[duckhunter]

Pappy Bush was smart enough to know when and how to end a war, and not overstep. Our mission was to get Iraq out of Kuwait. Mission accomplished, and we left. Pity his dumb ass son wasn't, and unfortunately, because he wasn't, we have the Middle East we have today.

+1000!

 

[SheriffJoe]

Pappy Bush was smart enough to know when and how to end a war, and not overstep. Our mission was to get Iraq out of Kuwait. Mission accomplished, and we left. Pity his dumb ass son wasn't, and unfortunately, because he wasn't, we have the Middle East we have today.

Um, there was no "mission accomplished" - Google Operation Desert Fox under President Clinton. Sane people came to realize it was a neverending war.

"Stabilizing Saddam" would have marched right back into Kuwait (and Saudi Arabia) the minute American troops left the region.

The status-quo at the time wasn't a sustainable policy.

 

[The Guesser]

Um, there was no "mission accomplished" - Google Operation Desert Fox under President Clinton. Sane people came to realize it was a neverending war.

"Stabilizing Saddam" would have marched right back into Kuwait (and Saudi Arabia) the minute American troops left the region.

The status-quo at the time wasn't a sustainable policy.

Operation Desert Fox had nothing to do with Kuwait, and nothing to do with Pappy Bush. I stick to my statements. It was a 3-4 day bombing mission to destroy some of Sadaam's WMD capabilities. No invasion, no removal of Sadaam as a goal. Many people at the time thought it was just another Wag The Dog instance by Clinton to take heat off his blowjobs.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Btw, if Pappy Bush was such a great leader, why did the electorate give him the boot?

Unfortunately, his successor was even worse, refusing to develop a sound strategy to deal with RADICAL ISLAMISTS who were killing Americans. The US embassy bombings in Africa, the first WTC bombing, the Khobar tower bombings, the USS Cole bombing...while the masterminds of the attacks (Al-Qaeda) remained operational, dangerous and doing interviews on CNN.

Then, 9 months into the Bush presidency, the worst attack on American soil EVER.

Appeasing or ignoring RADICAL ISLAM is suicide. Why can't liberals understand this?

 

[SheriffJoe]

Operation Desert Fox had nothing to do with Kuwait, and nothing to do with Pappy Bush. I stick to my statements. It was a 3-4 day bombing mission to destroy some of Sadaam's WMD capabilities. No invasion, no removal of Sadaam as a goal. Many people at the time thought it was just another Wag The Dog instance by Clinton to take heat off his blowjobs.

You can "stick to your statements" but your statements are patently false and intellectually dishonest - the US was at war with Saddam's Iraq one way or another through three presidencies - not a long term sustainable strategy.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Wow! Looking back, before America lost its collective mind and elected an anti-Semitic Muslim, Democrats actually sounded sane.

hno:

 

[The Guesser]

Btw, if Pappy Bush was such a great leader, why did the electorate give him the boot?

Unfortunately, his successor was even worse, refusing to develop a sound strategy to deal with RADICAL ISLAMISTS who were killing Americans. The US embassy bombings in Africa, the first WTC bombing, the Khobar tower bombings, the USS Cole bombing...while the masterminds of the attacks (Al-Qaeda) remained operational, dangerous and doing interviews on CNN.

Then, 9 months into the Bush presidency, the worst attack on American soil EVER.

Appeasing or ignoring RADICAL ISLAM is suicide. Why can't liberals understand this?

Pappy Bush lost because he committed the Cardinal sin in the Modern Republican Party. He was sane about tax policy. After his stupid, ridiculous, "Read My Lips, No New taxes", nonsense, when he was actually governing, he saw that increasing taxes was needed, and best for America, and he did it. For that, he was kicked out of office. But He's overall the best President in my lifetime. Unfortunately his son is the worst, and responsible for allowing the worst attack on American soil EVER, and the atrocious policies that followed, that are responsible for the Middle East mess today.

 

[The Guesser]

You can "stick to your statements" but your statements are patently false and intellectually dishonest - the US was at war with Saddam's Iraq one way or another through three presidencies - not a long term sustainable strategy.

We were not at War with Iraq during the Clinton administration. Unfortunately we likely will be under the next Clinton administration. ^

 

[The Guesser]

Wow! Looking back, before America lost its collective mind and elected an anti-Semitic Muslim, Democrats actually sounded sane.

hno:

All those Democrats were proven WRONG. There were several who were PROVEN right, including the current POTUS, who was elected and re-elected, largely because he was PROVEN right.