<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by billpapa:
Originally posted by FISHHEAD:
Suppose I place a wager on the upcoming PGA CHAMPIONSHIP with the following odds...
#1. Michelson 6-1
#2 Els 7-1
#3. Woods 8-1
#4. Singh 8-1
Golfers #5-30 ranging from 10-1 to 50-1
FIELD 25-1
If it was known that Love would participate a reasonable line for him would have been (judging from what the lines for golfers seeded 1 to 4) something like 10 to 1. There is no way that the field bet posted line of 25 to 1 is a "good" line. It should have been more like 5 to 1 or so. Therefore the claim that this was not a fair line is valid. I believe the book's claim is correct. Of course they did not notice until pretty late which complicates things. However, the posted line for the field was excessively off. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
DON'T FORGET YOUR FISHICS'