Is it right for a public state school to spend all that money

Search

Rx. Senior
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,490
Tokens
Using LSU as an example is worthless. Everyone agrees that there is a very small percentage of college teams and athletic departments that do make money. Southeastern is in Louisiana, how much money does their football team make? My guess is far less than their operating costs. As a public university, that is a government bailout

(And even private colleges recieve a lot of state and federal financial aid along with a lot of other government grants)

Also, why does LSU put its football profits into something like women's basketball? The answer is obviously because President Nixon told them to. But unless the school has nothing but football, basketball and just enough women's teams to comply with Title IX, putting the profits back into more sports that benefit only a coule dozen students, rather than a couple dozen thousand students is still a government bailout

Ohio State has the highest grossing athletic program in the country, over $100 million. The operating costs are also over $100 million. They could easily cut operating costs and turn a far bigger profit and then take less tax money to support the rest of the school. Again, by refusing to do that, the government is bailing out their excess spending

The only difference, though, between the banks and the car companies is that nearly everyone wants the government to bail out these sports programs, while there is a huge mix of opinion on the other things
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,810
Messages
13,573,528
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com