Insiders for Friday (99-82 +2330)

[teehop]

Actually, not a chance would I vote for that bitch. But someone has to start defending this guy. If there were no rules prohibiting substances, he didnt cheat. You can hate himfor being an asshole (which he is), but he didnt do anything against the rules. Your complaint should be with Donald Fehr and Gene Orza.

I don`t care one way or another, you can be juiced up but that won`t help you see the ball, can`t help you hit a ball, maybe hit a ball farther but overall regardless if you debate over if he used or not he still surpassed "The Babe".

As far is Sen. Clinton would I vote for her, well hell I did not vote for the vote-thief we call a President. That being said we should all invest in ebonics and sell it in South Florida maybe then voters there can learn to read a damn ballot.uppy:

 

[FairWarning]

Insiders, you continue to call Barry Bonds a cheater. Please tell me what rule he broke and what evidence you have. I am guessing you have some sort of information of a failed drug test that no one else is aware of. Of course, before a few years ago, there was no drug testing as using any form of substance was not against any MLB rules. Until someone finds a urine or blood sample that is tainted (like what they have found with Lance Armstrong) no one can prove that Barry Bonds did anything wrong.

Bonds ADMITTED to taking them. He said in his testimony that he didn't know what he was taking. He took whatever his trainer suggested.

 

[PatrickMcIrish]

Fair is right TV, Bonds has admitted he cheated. There is nothing to wonder about. His alibi simply was that he didn't realize he was cheating at the time, not that he never did cheat. That has long since been established through his own testimony.

If you want to try to defend him than say others were doing it etc...., but no way you can say he wasn't cheating and using steroids, he's admitted it to a grand jury.