Inside info on Spurs game tomorrow

Search

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
15,196
Tokens
Game is final..... checking now....

have a feeling going to get screwed......


first team with 40... and their final total...... 45!!!!!!

FUCK YEAH, BABY!!!!!!!



CASH THIS FUCKING BITCH!!!!!!!
 

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
So BS info and all nonsense. Alluded to this earlier.

Body, maybe I can get you to be on the side of common sense and be anti-tranny..... instead of lumping yourself in with all these other tranny bathroom expedition explorers.

What a surprise (note sarcasm). An irrational and incoherent comment from the Village Idiot. I used to wonder if you even graduated from grammar school. I no longer wonder.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
16,780
Tokens
Thanks for the winner as this was the first NBA game that I'd bet all year
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
15,196
Tokens
Lol. You were glued to the tv and getting wet when Bucks were up double digits early.

Lol. I totally forgot about it and saw the thread and checked the game afterwards. Surprised it won? Not really.

There was no information or insight. Inside information? Lol.

Throw one game out there it will win or lose..... throw ten games out there.... then you'll have problems producing a positive result over even the short-term.

A retard could throw one game out there.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
15,196
Tokens
What a surprise (note sarcasm). An irrational and incoherent comment from the Village Idiot. I used to wonder if you even graduated from grammar school. I no longer wonder.


If it isn't the male Serena. Do I even need to post youtube videos of how you act? Or are you in denial?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
15,196
Tokens
To recap. No angle or inside information. Just a random pick with no foundation for winning.

Two outcomes. It either covers or it doesn't. It goes over or it goes under.

Pure genius.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,646
Tokens
Dragoon was correct in most of her assessment.

It was a very good spot for well coached, rested SA, at home, needed a win whereas road team Bucks in back to back game situation, just traveled 1000 miles, did not need the win... did not fight in the 2nd half like SA did. Folded like a cheap lawn chair.

Sure, no key players "sat" but did they "mail it in", maybe...? Got their points for their personal offensive stats but did they play all out "D"?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
15,196
Tokens
Dragoon was correct in most of her assessment.

It was a very good spot for well coached, rested SA, at home, needed a win whereas road team Bucks in back to back game situation, just traveled 1000 miles, did not need the win... did not fight in the 2nd half like SA did. Folded like a cheap lawn chair.

Sure, no key players "sat" but did they "mail it in", maybe...? Got their points for their personal offensive stats but did they play all out "D"?

You get this every day. Same scenarios. Some days it pans out, some days not.


Also, the "mail it in" angle in the NBA is the funniest of all. The reason why the totals are so high is b/c these basketball Americans are so fucking lazy that they play no defense and give zero fucks on defense.

Harden is a star and he might be the laziest great player of all time. Seriously, he does not even try unless he has the ball in his hands.

But it is what it is.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
If it isn't the male Serena. Do I even need to post youtube videos of how you act? Or are you in denial?

More incoherent and irrational babbling. When you have something intelligent to say (or at least can relate something to what I'm said in this thread) I'd be happy to respond to it. The fact of the matter is most people here understand you're not the sharpest tool in the shed. Hard not to think that when you start threads and then precede for pages having a conversation with yourself (since no one is responding to it). And then starting one post after another about transvestites, which it appears you have some sexual fascination with. You really should get some help.

Had it not been for your nonsense, some of the things you said in this thread are actually valid (but no one takes you seriously because the rest of the time, you're just an idiot).
 

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
Dragoon was correct in most of her assessment.

It was a very good spot for well coached, rested SA, at home, needed a win whereas road team Bucks in back to back game situation, just traveled 1000 miles, did not need the win... did not fight in the 2nd half like SA did. Folded like a cheap lawn chair.

Sure, no key players "sat" but did they "mail it in", maybe...? Got their points for their personal offensive stats but did they play all out "D"?

Actually that's complete nonsense. The actual quote was absolutely incorrect....

"According to my source the Bucks are ''mailing in'' tomorrow's game against the Spurs.

Mailing in meaning they plan on resting a couple ''key'' guys as well as playing to ensure health."

What was more the case was the comment that was made in the write-up in the game (that I quoted)...."The Bucks have played two games, and flown 1,100 miles south, since San Antonio played a game, so fatigue could be a factor on Sunday." And as the game played out, that appeared to be exactly what happened and they fizzled fairly quick in the 2nd half.

Nothing in Dragoon's post talked about that and as stated, no players rested. So the information was bogus, regardless of the outcome. Dragoon came in and admitted that (so I'll give him/her credit for that). And neither of us knew the outcome of the game at the point where it was stated that no players rested.

Believe it or not, the most intelligent post in the thread was Runmaker's ...." You can tell by the read of this rant that this is not a long-term EV+ scenario". I really doesn't matter to me if a game wins in a scenario like this as the information can't be trusted and over the long run, you will probably lose if you follow someone that passes out faulty info and makes decisions on games based on it. Unfortunately, as stated above, Runmaker is such a moron with everything else he says that people don't actually listen to a thing he says (even when it does make sense).

With that said....this was indeed the funniest post of the thread because it describes him to a t....

Yeah true bro
We’re all waiting on pins and needles for your Fillipino handball picks, and subsequent 3 pages of you talking to yourself through the L
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
21,942
Tokens
Inside info is 99.99999999% garbage. We don't really have any information others don't. It was the right side. Probably just a guy trying to helpm trusting another person with their "inside info" foolishness. No harm. But understand it is all bull
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
101,988
Tokens
Inside info is 99.99999999% garbage. We don't really have any information others don't. It was the right side. Probably just a guy trying to helpm trusting another person with their "inside info" foolishness. No harm. But understand it is all bull


Bite your tongue! Stu Finer has inside info every game :)
 

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
Inside info is 99.99999999% garbage. We don't really have any information others don't. It was the right side. Probably just a guy trying to helpm trusting another person with their "inside info" foolishness. No harm. But understand it is all bull

Yep, completely agree.

I can only think of one time in my life that I could qualify in that .0000001% category you were talking about. It was at a gym I was working in San Francisco and the visiting teams playing the Warriors would practice on our basketball court. A key player sprained his ankle during a practice and I was there to see it (was walking in the pool area which was directly across from the court). Barely won much on the game as I wasn't in a position to really bet a ton and the line moved immediately when the player was listed as "doubtful" for the game. As you stated though, the majority of the time, it's pure bullshit when someone makes a claim like this (not saying Dragoon knew, just calling it what it is...and he said as much in his original post).
 

Quitting while you're ahead isn't the same as quit
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Messages
2,465
Tokens
Dumb. Actually, I'd rather have a W and the info be correct (the best option, which the OP agreed with.) At the time I posted that, the game was within a point of the spread, so no bias on my part. Just reporting an observation from the box score. No need to get defensive.
Duh captain obvious:ohno:
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
47,945
Tokens
Leave the guy alone.

He brought us some info that he thought was accurate and well sourced.

The Bucs didn't appear to be all in in that second half.

They seem to be cruising a little. They lost at PHOENIX and Utah on the road in the last week too.

Bottom line is that the guy tried to help the board. Kinda cheesy to be calling him out.

Oh yea. The game won. What would you dingleberries be saying if the game lost?

Leave the guy alone.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
I don't think anyone is trying to grill the guy, but the process/results aspect of the thread does show how results oriented people can be.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,445
Messages
13,533,481
Members
100,368
Latest member
marcomo
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com