Don't worry though as I am quite that sbd is going to tell us that Mark is "part of the plan" and "just like" was the case with Mike
Pence and soon Jack Smith, he will eventually emerge as a hero!!
And I am sure lenny the human Trump condom will simply point to one of his polls showing that Trump is way ahead and simply
negate this latest devastating blow to Trump!! lol
One of the big differences between me and sbd, lenny and sheriff HOE is that unlike them, I was raised properly and learned to accept
losing as part of life and accepting it gracefully and then moving on and use the defeat as a learning experience!!
That is clearly not the case with the three folks cited nor their mentor and deity Donald Trump!!
Sadly with all of them, in the case of Trump, their denial of reality will just make it all that difficult emotionally to accept reality as it
is rather than what they want it to be when the curtain comes down for the final time!!
losing as part of life and accepting it gracefully and then moving on and use the defeat as a learning experience!!
That is clearly not the case with the three folks cited nor their mentor and deity Donald Trump!!
Sadly with all of them, in the case of Trump, their denial of reality will just make it all that difficult emotionally to accept reality as it
is rather than what they want it to be when the curtain comes down for the final time!!
From last night for those who didn't see it:
Here is an interesting question/paradox for any intelligent, objective and unbiased observer to consider when it comes to
sbd.
I will use two examples to make my point:
Sbd claims that anything surrounding Trump is "fake news" pumped to us by the left-wing media and we simply swallow
it as the truth.
The latest instance is what he alleges is "fake news" regarding the latest Mar-a-Lago news.
One of the big problems is that sbd has never clearly defined what he means by "fake news" meaning that we have to try to read his mind
and figure it out assuming that he even knows himself!!
For purposes of this discussion, I am going to make the assumption in this case that the "fake news" means
Jack Smith and the DOJ simply don't have any supporting evidence to support what they claim!!
Further, imo this means that when they bring this evidence forward, sbd is going to immediately claim it is a lie, which would equate
with "fake news!"
As usual, sbd will have nothing SPECIFIC to rebut whatever is presented in the way of evidence and simply claim it is "fake news"
and hope that it flies!!
On the other hand, by sbd's statements and implication one example of "real news" is that in the 2020 Election
in reality, Trump won all fifty states and got upwards of 90% of the popular vote because his "real news" sources said so.
The problem with this is that he has never/not once cited any proof of this namely because there isn't any.
But yet, we are supposed to accept it is true based on his say-so!!
Thus ladies and gentlemen of this thread, I will leave it to you to decide whether to believe sbd's contention about the
2020 Election as well as to consider whether he is using the same standards of what he deems to be "fake news" as it applies
to Jack Smith and the other investigating committees as he is to what he claims about the veracity and reliability of his own
sources.
Your honor and members of the jury in this matter, I rest my case!!
Here is an interesting question/paradox for any intelligent, objective and unbiased observer to consider when it comes to
sbd.
I will use two examples to make my point:
Sbd claims that anything surrounding Trump is "fake news" pumped to us by the left-wing media and we simply swallow
it as the truth.
The latest instance is what he alleges is "fake news" regarding the latest Mar-a-Lago news.
One of the big problems is that sbd has never clearly defined what he means by "fake news" meaning that we have to try to read his mind
and figure it out assuming that he even knows himself!!
For purposes of this discussion, I am going to make the assumption in this case that the "fake news" means
Jack Smith and the DOJ simply don't have any supporting evidence to support what they claim!!
Further, imo this means that when they bring this evidence forward, sbd is going to immediately claim it is a lie, which would equate
with "fake news!"
As usual, sbd will have nothing SPECIFIC to rebut whatever is presented in the way of evidence and simply claim it is "fake news"
and hope that it flies!!
On the other hand, by sbd's statements and implication one example of "real news" is that in the 2020 Election
in reality, Trump won all fifty states and got upwards of 90% of the popular vote because his "real news" sources said so.
The problem with this is that he has never/not once cited any proof of this namely because there isn't any.
But yet, we are supposed to accept it is true based on his say-so!!
Thus ladies and gentlemen of this thread, I will leave it to you to decide whether to believe sbd's contention about the
2020 Election as well as to consider whether he is using the same standards of what he deems to be "fake news" as it applies
to Jack Smith and the other investigating committees as he is to what he claims about the veracity and reliability of his own
sources.
Your honor and members of the jury in this matter, I rest my case!!
It figures the scary looking stalking clown who inherited all his money and purchased his "wife" on an international trafficking site would harbor such unhinged hate for the man shutting down all the... Uhh, human trafficking. LolView attachment 69263
Another trap set.
But, of course, tards will BUY BUY BUY.
The only thing they love buying more than bullshit is wives, through international trafficking sites.
Don't worry though as I am quite that sbd is going to tell us that Mark is "part of the plan" and "just like" was the case with Mike
Pence and soon Jack Smith, he will eventually emerge as a hero!!
And I am sure lenny the human Trump condom will simply point to one of his polls showing that Trump is way ahead and simply
negate this latest devastating blow to Trump!! lol
And I’m sure it’s true . Far left Alternet is reporting on a story from left leaning Independent UK
Meadows has “reportedly “ accepted a plea deal from the Dept. of Justice in exchange for pleading guilty to federal charges.
Lol !
Another GREAT, GREAT read.
www.alternet.org
Guilty
Imminent
Soon, real soon.
Ultra low iqanons will need to get their checkbooks out, AGAIN!
I love this movie!
The stupid! It burns!
'Indictment anytime' or 'guilty plea'? Legal experts assess Team Trump’s DOJ visit
Legal experts responding to news Donald Trump‘s legal team Monday morning walked into the U.S. Dept. of Justice agree it likely means Special Counsel Jack Smith is nearing a charging decision, but warn it could also mean the ex-president, under criminal investigation for unlawful handling of...
www.alternet.org
Guilty
Imminent
Soon, real soon.
Ultra low iqanons will need to get their checkbooks out, AGAIN!
I love this movie!
The stupid! It burns!
Just remember folks that yours truly has suggested on a number of occasions that a plea bargain on behalf of Trump isAnother GREAT, GREAT read.
'Indictment anytime' or 'guilty plea'? Legal experts assess Team Trump’s DOJ visit
Legal experts responding to news Donald Trump‘s legal team Monday morning walked into the U.S. Dept. of Justice agree it likely means Special Counsel Jack Smith is nearing a charging decision, but warn it could also mean the ex-president, under criminal investigation for unlawful handling of...
Guilty
Imminent
Soon, real soon.
Ultra low iqanons will need to get their checkbooks out, AGAIN!
I love this movie!
The stupid! It burns!
a real possibility and imo the odds of it occurring are the highest that they have ever been!!
