Funny all involved in the operation happen to stay quiet. Only gullible fools like you and JFK JR. for Prez.US Special Forces recovered bodies, body parts and at least 100 surviving children from beneath the White House and Capitol Hill Building January 29, 2021.
The children were believed to have been abused, tortured and killed by political elites in Washington, DC's elaborate tunnel system.
The tunnels have since been flooded and bulldozed.
???
View attachment 69165
Off to Gitmo they went!
Ohhhh....you thought the military was there because Pelosi told you it was an "inshurecshion"????
It pays to know people beyond fake news and fake "fact-checkers"
Sheriff Hoe is either a very sick, demented and delusional fuck and/or such a failure in his life in just about everything that like an alcoholic
or drug addict he needs this thread to desperately seek some kind of attention even if it isn't favorable, which is obviously the case.
I mean think of it-I checked yesterday in his Devolution Thread and it hasn't been updated in two and a half months, and the last
person who updated it was him!!
What does that say about Sheriff Hoe!!
Always aiming for a new low level of stupid.
? ? ? Reminder: I broke the Pedo Island story on this site way back in 2016, long before these clowns had even heard of the name Jeffrey Epstein.
It was a "conspiracy" you see..
???
https://www.therx.com/threads/bombshell-bill-clinton-may-be-a-pedophile.1065362/
...until it wasn't.
Mock away - my sources are TARD-proof.
Because it pays to know people beyond your useless fake news and fake "fact-checkers"
? ? ? Reminder: I broke the Pedo Island story on this site way back in 2016, long before these clowns had even heard of the name Jeffrey Epstein.
It was a "conspiracy" you see..
???
https://www.therx.com/threads/bombshell-bill-clinton-may-be-a-pedophile.1065362/
...until it wasn't.
Mock away - my sources are TARD-proof.
Because it pays to know people beyond your useless fake news and fake "fact-checkers"
When conspiracy becomes TRUTH.Always aiming for a new low level of stupid.
? ? ? Reminder: I broke the Pedo Island story on this site long before these clowns had even heard of the name Jeffrey Epstein.
It was a "conspiracy" you see..
???
https://www.therx.com/threads/bombshell-bill-clinton-may-be-a-pedophile.1065362/
...until it wasn't.
My sources are impeccable.
Tick tock TARDS...
Because it pays to know people beyond your useless fake news and fake "fact-checkers"
Imagine STILL relying on fake news, fake polls and fake fact-checkers to tell you what to think and say.
? DOES ANYONE KNOW?
If savage1 was all gloom and doom yesterday when Bitcoin dropped?
And was he trying to bash the op after?
Or did he encourage people here to buy more on the dip?
Just curious, considering he was so bullish on BTC at 68,000 and telling people to BUY BUY BUY, that it was going to 250,000.
At the same time the op was telling people to SELL SELL SELL all the way down to 19-20,000 before starting to BUY BUY BUY.
If savage1 was all gloom and doom yesterday when Bitcoin dropped?
And was he trying to bash the op after?
Or did he encourage people here to buy more on the dip?
Just curious, considering he was so bullish on BTC at 68,000 and telling people to BUY BUY BUY, that it was going to 250,000.
At the same time the op was telling people to SELL SELL SELL all the way down to 19-20,000 before starting to BUY BUY BUY.
From last night for those who didn't see it:
Here is an interesting question/paradox for any intelligent, objective and unbiased observer to consider when it comes to
sbd.
I will use two examples to make my point:
Sbd claims that anything surrounding Trump is "fake news" pumped to us by the left-wing media and we simply swallow
it as the truth.
The latest instance is what he alleges is "fake news" regarding the latest Mar-a-Lago news.
One of the big problems is that sbd has never clearly defined what he means by "fake news" meaning that we have to try to read his mind
and figure it out assuming that he even knows himself!!
For purposes of this discussion, I am going to make the assumption in this case that the "fake news" means
Jack Smith and the DOJ simply don't have any supporting evidence to support what they claim!!
Further, imo this means that when they bring this evidence forward, sbd is going to immediately claim it is a lie, which would equate
with "fake news!"
As usual, sbd will have nothing SPECIFIC to rebut whatever is presented in the way of evidence and simply claim it is "fake news"
and hope that it flies!!
On the other hand, by sbd's statements and implication one example of "real news" is that in the 2020 Election
in reality, Trump won all fifty states and got upwards of 90% of the popular vote because his "real news" sources said so.
The problem with this is that he has never/not once cited any proof of this namely because there isn't any.
But yet, we are supposed to accept it is true based on his say-so!!
Thus ladies and gentlemen of this thread, I will leave it to you to decide whether to believe sbd's contention about the
2020 Election as well as to consider whether he is using the same standards of what he deems to be "fake news" as it applies
to Jack Smith and the other investigating committees as he is to what he claims about the veracity and reliability of his own
sources.
Your honor and members of the jury in this matter, I rest my case!!
Here is an interesting question/paradox for any intelligent, objective and unbiased observer to consider when it comes to
sbd.
I will use two examples to make my point:
Sbd claims that anything surrounding Trump is "fake news" pumped to us by the left-wing media and we simply swallow
it as the truth.
The latest instance is what he alleges is "fake news" regarding the latest Mar-a-Lago news.
One of the big problems is that sbd has never clearly defined what he means by "fake news" meaning that we have to try to read his mind
and figure it out assuming that he even knows himself!!
For purposes of this discussion, I am going to make the assumption in this case that the "fake news" means
Jack Smith and the DOJ simply don't have any supporting evidence to support what they claim!!
Further, imo this means that when they bring this evidence forward, sbd is going to immediately claim it is a lie, which would equate
with "fake news!"
As usual, sbd will have nothing SPECIFIC to rebut whatever is presented in the way of evidence and simply claim it is "fake news"
and hope that it flies!!
On the other hand, by sbd's statements and implication one example of "real news" is that in the 2020 Election
in reality, Trump won all fifty states and got upwards of 90% of the popular vote because his "real news" sources said so.
The problem with this is that he has never/not once cited any proof of this namely because there isn't any.
But yet, we are supposed to accept it is true based on his say-so!!
Thus ladies and gentlemen of this thread, I will leave it to you to decide whether to believe sbd's contention about the
2020 Election as well as to consider whether he is using the same standards of what he deems to be "fake news" as it applies
to Jack Smith and the other investigating committees as he is to what he claims about the veracity and reliability of his own
sources.
Your honor and members of the jury in this matter, I rest my case!!
We know who fell for the propaganda - same TARDS who ALWAYS fall for the propaganda!
The ones who call themselves, "the mockers" ?
Savor THAT irony. ? ? ?
Yes, the same "mockers" who STILL don't know the difference between ballots and votes.
Even though they had access to this thread - the best cutting edge info on the web - they STILL got sucked into the Cabal PSYOP!
That, my friends, takes a VERY special kind of STUPID.
The ones who call themselves, "the mockers" ?
Savor THAT irony. ? ? ?
Yes, the same "mockers" who STILL don't know the difference between ballots and votes.
Even though they had access to this thread - the best cutting edge info on the web - they STILL got sucked into the Cabal PSYOP!
That, my friends, takes a VERY special kind of STUPID.
Uh-oh It looks like Mark Meadows may be turning into a squealing pig on Trump to save his own sorry ass!!
That should suit the likes of sbd, lenny lenbo and sheriff HOE well because they will have someone new to wallow in in
the filth and slime that surrounds them and of course their hero and fellow swine, Donald Trump!!
Let's all oink it up for Mark Meadows!! lol
That should suit the likes of sbd, lenny lenbo and sheriff HOE well because they will have someone new to wallow in in
the filth and slime that surrounds them and of course their hero and fellow swine, Donald Trump!!
Let's all oink it up for Mark Meadows!! lol
Fify? DOES ANYONE KNOW?
If savage1 was all gloom and doom yesterday when Bitcoin dropped?
And was he trying to bash the op after?
Or did he encourage people here to buy more on the dip?
Just curious, considering he was so bullish on BTC at 68,000 and telling people to BUY BUY BUY, that it was going to 250,000.
At the same time the op was telling people to SELL SELL SELL all the way down to 40,000 before starting to BUY BUY BUY.
