If/not until and when it is proven in a court of law, will I comment.What about this fucking lying asshole:
Durham Drops Bomb: Lying Adam Schiff Was Involved in Russia Collusion Sham Way Back in July 2016 | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
Adam Schiff was knee-deep in the Trump Russia collusion sham. He was involved way back in July 2016. John Durham just confirmed it. John Durham released some documents yesterday related to the Trump – Russia collusion sham created by the Hillary Clinton gang. We reported on this earlier.www.thegatewaypundit.com
If so I will openly admit that he deserves and punishment forthcoming.
Will you do the same if Trump is found guilty of any wrongdoing surrounding any wrongdoing for his role on July 6 or as
I suspect, you have already made up your mind that he is innocent no matter what the facts of the Investigation show??
Once again your 100% inability to "respond " in any other way other than in name-calling and insults defines wh and what you are
as well as of course your obvious envy and jealousy that you have neither the intellect, experience nor debating skills to dare
to try to engage me in relevant topics of the day-it is that simple!!
The point here is that even though I believe the documentation that Trump did tell over 30,000 plus lies and/or misleading statements
over four years, in actuality, whether it be 30,000, 25,000, 20,000, 15000, or even "just" ten thousand, he is as Bernie
Sanders a "pathological liar!"
In reality, for any intelligent and objective person, the only documentation needed is/has been one's own ears during his tenure to
conclude that he is a pathological liar.
It is essentially the same as worrying for example that because Russia has 20,000 weapons of mass destruction at its
disposal whereas the US has only say a "mere" 15,000, that we had better worry because they can destroy our country in its entirety
more time than we can destroy theirs!!!
I hope my point and comparison is clear here as it applies to Trump!!
^^^^^^^
The point here is that even though I believe the documentation that Trump did tell over 30,000 plus lies and/or misleading statements over four years .
Yet there is none
Counting Trump saying we built the greatest economy over 400 times as a lie isn’t documentation .
You don’t even have to be intelligent to know the math says otherwise .
?
I provided the documentation and link several times.
If you want to bury your head in the sand and proclaim that he virtually never lied, it might be time for a hearing examination.
And no repeating the same lie several times doesn't get you or him off of the hook-in fact it makes him
look worse by his need to repeat it as many times as he has and possibly to the point where he believes the lie!!!
Think and believe as you wish-the TRUTH is that he is a big-time LIAR, and again any objective person(which does not include you),
who has ears and listened to Trump just a few times not only during his tenure but afterward realizes that with the
LIE OF ALL LIES which he continues to repeat that the 2020 Election was stolen from him without one shed of evidence
and plenty of empirical evidence to the contrary!!
That's it for me I am not going to go back and forth with you again about a KNOWN AND WELL DOCUMENTED AND
ESTABLISHED FACT about Trump.
Hope that this makes you feel better, Lenny, as this article conservatively puts Trump's lies at a "mere" 22,000 ones over four years.
If your think what is posted here as examples of Trump's lies don't qualify as lies, then well so be it!!!
www.alternet.org
If your think what is posted here as examples of Trump's lies don't qualify as lies, then well so be it!!!
Here are the most dangerous and notable lies Trump spewed during his presidency
For the last four years, fact-checkers have had their hands full keeping up with President Donald Trump's unprecedented level of dishonesty. While The Washington Post reported that Trump had delivered more than 22,000 false or misleading claims and as of Oct. 22, a new editorial highlights the...
www.alternet.org
Hope that this makes you feel better, Lenny, as this article conservatively puts Trump's lies at a "mere" 22,000 ones over four years.
If your think what is posted here as examples of Trump's lies don't qualify as lies, then well so be it!!!
Here are the most dangerous and notable lies Trump spewed during his presidency
For the last four years, fact-checkers have had their hands full keeping up with President Donald Trump's unprecedented level of dishonesty. While The Washington Post reported that Trump had delivered more than 22,000 false or misleading claims and as of Oct. 22, a new editorial highlights the...
Posted there is nothing close to 22,000 documented lies lightweight .
Quit while you’re way behind .
New York’s Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul signed the redistricting plan which realigned 22 districts into heavily Democratic areas and 4 districts into Republican areas, which could have resulted in up to four GOP seats in Congress being wiped out in November.
The cockroaches know they aren’t winning on an even playing field .
Once again, moron, Your focus of emphasis is wrong in that you are concentrating on the numbers rather than the severity and intent ofPosted there is nothing close to 22,000 documented lies lightweight .
Quit while you’re way behind .
the lies, which was to deceive!!
If you don't understand what I mean here and/or disagree with it, it once again just shows your stubbornness.
If you don't agree with this post as well as the one which follows, then please state why not.
In essence, I just posted above examples of Trump's lies which you chose not to acknowledge and/or explain why they are
not lies and/or were justified and instead tried to change the subject and concentrate on the number of lies told.
Once again I have exposed your total lack of debating skills both if above and in my previous post posted below, the points of which you
did not address!!!
If you want to continue in your present modus operandi, please continue to do so as it just gives me more opportunity to expose
and destroy you.
In case your "forgot," in addition to the last post which you didn't respond to, here is the earlier one from which you ran away and hid and
tried to divert attention to something unrelated:
"The point here is that even though I believe the documentation that Trump did tell over 30,000 plus lies and/or misleading statements
over four years, in actuality, whether it be 30,000, 25,000, 20,000, 15000, or even "just" ten thousand, he is as Bernie
Sanders refers to him"pathological liar!"
In reality, for any intelligent and objective person, the only documentation needed is/has been one's own ears during his tenure to
conclude that he is a pathological liar.
It is essentially the same as worrying for example that because Russia has 20,000 weapons of mass destruction at its
disposal whereas the US has only say a "mere" 15,000, that we had better worry because they can destroy our country in its entirety
more time than we can destroy theirs!!!
I hope my point and comparison are clear here as it applies to Trump!!
Oh, now it’s not the number of lies you continue to embarrassingly regurgitate .
I can’t believe I have to say this , but maybe Witless or schmirt can help you out of that deep hole you’re in .
?
Now on to Mark Hemingway to make that hole you’re in a little deeper you mental midget .
The problem is that any cursory inspection of the Post database reveals that the idea that Trump has told 20,000 “false or misleading” statements is itself false and misleading. Vast quantities of the 20,000 are redundancies – statements, however tendentious, that Trump has repeated ad nauseum. More problematic is that thousands of statements The Washington Post labels as untrue or misleading are more properly considered the habitual verbal excess for a man known for his immoderate form of communication. Further, a great many of the Post’s objections to Trump’s statements amount to argumentative quibbles that aren’t really “fact checks.”
Once again you completely ignored and refused to address DIRECTLY what I posted in #31418 and like the laughable WEASEL you
are, predictably tried to change the topic to your own liking rather than what I pointed out and asked.
Hiw about addressing and responding to the SPECIFIC LIES I posted above or as I suspect, which is always there case when I
batter your wimpy ass up against the wall, just run away and hide or try to get out of your dilemma as you just did because you
are such a weak debater who does not the ability to stay on topic.
SPOILER ALERT-when all of the damaging and devastating facts are revealed over the next few months by Liz, Adam and Jaime,
your modus operandi will be both to dismiss everything as total lies and as you just did above by concentrating on the
number of lies Trumo old rather than the content of those lies, and more importantly you will try to diminish these folks to
a "sham committee"" regardless of what they present in the way of facts.
Perhaps some day you will learn how to debate in a more formidable way or least improve your ability to do so, Lenny,
which wouldn't be saying much as the elevator can only go up from the basement/ground floor, where you and your
"debating skills" currently find themselves!!
