Important Virus Update

[savage1]

I will blame the press for undoubtedly being the left arm of the Democratic Party . Look not too far back at the Russia hoax coverage and the Hunter laptop story and do a before and after as proof .


As for answering questions . There was no President that answered more questions by making himself available to the press . Fact !

Compare him to the the feeble minded puppet in the WH controlled by his handlers by keeping him out of sight as much as possible .

Keep trying to rationalize and ignore my points.

In fact if Psaki had been asked the questions you wanted the press to ask her, neither you nor anyone else knows for sure

how she would have responded, what she would have said, and how it would have been received.

Your kind of thinking reminds in a sense of a sports gambler who loses year after year with logic last this:

This kind of gambler looks at a college basketball team with say a 12-0 record and which is playing a team with say 7-5

record.

Lets say also that the undefeated team is favored by two points.

For the sake of example, lets say the undefeated team's record is based on playing some so-so teams in their schedule,

whereas the 7-5 team has played a much tougher schedule.

Without even thinking, the loser gambler unloads on the team with the 7-5 record with the rationale like

"Who has the undefeated team played???"

In a lot more cases than not the 12-0 team wins and covers and the loser I described loses.

Why?

It is for the simple reason that 12-0 gteam didn't make up the schedule and have no control over who they play.

Thus to simply infer that they are going to lose because the teams they played are of lesser caliber

then the 7-5 makes no sense only because of their schedule because it infers that they can't handle better teams.

As I see it, it is essentially the same thing with Psaki if one makes the assumption that she can not handle tougher

questions if she was asked them.

She is a pretty smart and shrewd gal!!

Re: Trump's answering questions, he answered all of the ones which were easy to address but as stated,

when asked something which he couldn't handle and which would make him look, bad, he "responded"

with namecalling and insults only, the same as does fpp/sbd, the only difference being that Trump took the questions,

whereas fpp/sbd pretended that he didn't read the hard-hitting questions I and the others hurled at

him along with his 99.9% failed predictions.


Finally and once again, respond to this, or you going to remain chicken shit and scared of your own shadow

by not so doing?

"And again, douchebag, you continue to show that you don't have the courage of your convictions and/or are scared

to stand up to fpp/sbd by not answering not only the current question I asked about Bush's alleged arrest

but also the alleged ones and also executions of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton as well as Bill Gates and Governor

Cuomo!!!"

 

[savage1]

If Kenosha don’t get it, shut it down” chants outside the courthouse, as the Rittenhouse trial nears conclusion in Wisconsin

Free Christmas shopping could come as early as this week in Kenosha .

Send in "President" Trump's "private military" to quell any disturbances which may occur!! lol

 

[savage1]

It's going to be biblical!

?

A cryptic narrative which as usual says nothing SPECIFICALLY about what exactly is going to be biblical.

You also stated that last July 4th was going to be "biblical," and "a day to be remembered for centuries."

In retrospect, you never did tell us what as so special on that date and how it worked out.

I wonder why!! lol

 

[LENBO]

Keep trying to rationalize and ignore my points.

In fact if Psaki had been asked the questions you wanted the press to ask her, neither you nor anyone else knows for sure

how she would have responded, what she would have said, and how it would have been received.

Your kind of thinking reminds in a sense of a sports gambler who loses year after year with logic last this:

This kind of gambler looks at a college basketball team with say a 12-0 record and which is playing a team with say 7-5

record.

Lets say also that the undefeated team is favored by two points.

For the sake of example, lets say the undefeated team's record is based on playing some so-so teams in their schedule,

whereas the 7-5 team has played a much tougher schedule.

Without even thinking, the loser gambler unloads on the team with the 7-5 record with the rationale like

"Who has the undefeated team played???"

In a lot more cases than not the 12-0 team wins and covers and the loser I described loses.

Why?

It is for the simple reason that 12-0 gteam didn't make up the schedule and have no control over who they play.

Thus to simply infer that they are going to lose because the teams they played are of lesser caliber

then the 7-5 makes no sense only because of their schedule because it infers that they can't handle better teams.

As I see it, it is essentially the same thing with Psaki if one makes the assumption that she can not handle tougher

questions if she was asked them.

She is a pretty smart and shrewd gal!!

Re: Trump's answering questions, he answered all of the ones which were easy to address but as stated,

when asked something which he couldn't handle and which would make him look, bad, he "responded"

with namecalling and insults only, the same as does fpp/sbd, the only difference being that Trump took the questions,

whereas fpp/sbd pretended that he didn't read the hard-hitting questions I and the others hurled at

him along with his 99.9% failed predictions.


Finally and once again, respond to this, or you going to remain chicken shit and scared of your own shadow

by not so doing?

"And again, douchebag, you continue to show that you don't have the courage of your convictions and/or are scared

to stand up to fpp/sbd by not answering not only the current question I asked about Bush's alleged arrest

but also the alleged ones and also executions of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton as well as Bill Gates and Governor

Cuomo!!!"

Keep trying to rationalize and ignore my points.

In fact if Psaki had been asked the questions you wanted the press to ask her, neither you nor anyone else knows for sure

how she would have responded, what she would have said, and how it would have been received.

Your kind of thinking reminds in a sense of a sports gambler who loses year after year with logic last this:

This kind of gambler looks at a college basketball team with say a 12-0 record and which is playing a team with say 7-5

record.

Lets say also that the undefeated team is favored by two points.

For the sake of example, lets say the undefeated team's record is based on playing some so-so teams in their schedule,

whereas the 7-5 team has played a much tougher schedule.

Without even thinking, the loser gambler unloads on the team with the 7-5 record with the rationale like

"Who has the undefeated team played???"

In a lot more cases than not the 12-0 team wins and covers and the loser I described loses.

Why?

It is for the simple reason that 12-0 gteam didn't make up the schedule and have no control over who they play.

Thus to simply infer that they are going to lose because the teams they played are of lesser caliber

then the 7-5 makes no sense only because of their schedule because it infers that they can't handle better teams.

As I see it, it is essentially the same thing with Psaki if one makes the assumption that she can not handle tougher

questions if she was asked them.

She is a pretty smart and shrewd gal!!

Re: Trump's answering questions, he answered all of the ones which were easy to address but as stated,

when asked something which he couldn't handle and which would make him look, bad, he "responded"

with namecalling and insults only, the same as does fpp/sbd, the only difference being that Trump took the questions,

whereas fpp/sbd pretended that he didn't read the hard-hitting questions I and the others hurled at

him along with his 99.9% failed predictions.


Finally and once again, respond to this, or you going to remain chicken shit and scared of your own shadow

by not so doing?

"And again, douchebag, you continue to show that you don't have the courage of your convictions and/or are scared

to stand up to fpp/sbd by not answering not only the current question I asked about Bush's alleged arrest

but also the alleged ones and also executions of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton as well as Bill Gates and Governor

Cuomo!!!"

Right . Same goes with Biden . If the senile protected puppet was asked as many questions as Trump , we don’t know how he would have responded or how it would have been received . Lol !

My point was you dumb f**k , we’re 10 months in and neither Sleepy Joe or Little Red Lying Hood will be asked anywhere near the amount of questions , let alone pressing ones that Trump and his press Secretaries received because they have the media in their back pocket .

 

[savage1]

Right . Same goes with Biden . If the senile protected puppet was asked as many questions as Trump , we don’t know how he would have responded or how it would have been received . Lol !

My point was you dumb f**k , we’re 10 months in and neither Sleepy Joe or Little Red Lying Hood will be asked anywhere near the amount of questions , let alone pressing ones that Trump and his press Secretaries received because they have the media on their side .

It is not babbling, friend, and especially what I said in my betting analogy.

If you don't have a DIRECT response to why you disagree with my analogy, and instead try to change the issue to one

on your terms only(which is in fact has been shown to be your overall modus operandi), then so be it-for the zillionth

time I will have proved my points when debating you, namely that you should discuss and debate someone more on your

intellectual and educational level!!



And again, douchebag, you continue to show that you don't have the courage of your convictions and/or are scared

to stand up to fpp/sbd by not answering not only the current question I asked about Bush's alleged arrest

but also the alleged ones and also executions of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton as well as Bill Gates and Governor

Cuomo!!!

 

[sportsm60]

BLM is currently protesting outside the courthouse for three white guys which included a pedophile.

You can't make this stuff up.

?

Libtardism at its finest. LOL

 

[sportsm60]

Psaki is a welcome improvement over that lying self-serving bitch Kayleigh McEnany, although Kayleigh

is admittedly a lot prettier!!! lol

LOL. You are a Meathead!

 

[LENBO]

It is not babbling, friend, and especially what I said in my betting analogy.

If you don't have a DIRECT response to why you disagree with my analogy, and instead try to change the issue to one

on your terms only(which is in fact has been shown to be your overall modus operandi), then so be it-for the zillionth

time I will have proved my points when debating you, namely that you should discuss and debate someone more on your level.



And again, douchebag, you continue to show that you don't have the courage of your convictions and/or are scared

to stand up to fpp/sbd by not answering not only the current question I asked about Bush's alleged arrest

but also the alleged ones and also executions of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton as well as Bill Gates and Governor

Cuomo!!!

You’re the equivalent of a pimple on an Elephant’s ass as far as your debating skills go .

I almost feel sorry continually smacking around a CNN brainwashed pip squeak .

 

[LENBO]

Hey Libtards -

Check in if you support this doozie buried deep in your party’s Build Back Better bill . Because it won’t be reported by any of your left wing media publications .

House social spending bill would cut SSN requirement for child tax credit

House Democrats’ sweeping $1.75 trillion social spending bill would remove the requirement that child tax credit claimants have a valid Social Security number.

nypost.com

House Democrats’ sweeping $1.75 trillion social spending bill would remove the requirement that child tax credit claimants have a valid Social Security number — potentially opening the way for illegal immigrants and their children to receive billions in benefits.

The provision on page 1,647 of the 2,135-page Build Back Better Act — which Democratic leaders are hoping to put to a House vote this week — would repeal 26 US Code § 24 paragraph 7, which details the Social Security number requirement to obtain child tax credits.

“No credit shall be allowed under this section to a taxpayer with respect to any qualifying child unless the taxpayer includes the Social Security number of such child on the return of tax for the taxable year,” the current code reads.

By repealing this requirement, the bill would expand child tax credits to parents of children who don’t have Social Security numbers — including many illegal immigrants.

 

[savage1]

You’re the equivalent of a pimple on an Elephant’s ass as far as your debating skills go .

I almost feel sorry continually smacking around a CNN brainwashed pip squeak .

Lack of debating skills you say???

Just today I have left you trailing badly in the dust today alone with my FAR and I mean FAR relevant and perceptive and relevant

questions, and DEBATING SKILLS, which are beyond your ability to respond because 1) you don't have anything to offer

which will fly except to avoid the questions, points and analogies made on my part and ask something else in

return and/or 2) you simply don't have the mental capacities to think outside the box and think/intellectualize

on a far deeper level than the surface of your skin!!

Your refusal and/or inability to respond to what I posted before in my response to you is a glaring example of what I am talking about:


"And again, douchebag, you continue to show that you don't have the courage of your convictions and/or are scared

to stand up to fpp/sbd by not answering not only the current question I asked about Bush's alleged arrest

but also the alleged ones and also executions of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton as well as Bill Gates and Governor

Cuomo!!!"

 

[LENBO]

Lack of debating skills you say???

Just today I have left you trailing badly in the dust today alone with my FAR and I mean FAR relevant and perceptive and relevant

questions, and DEBATING SKILLS, which are beyond your ability to respond because 1) you don't have anything to offer

which will fly except to avoid the questions, points and analogies made on my part and ask something else in

return and/or 2) you simply don't have the mental capacities to think outside the box and think/intellectualize

on a far deeper level than the surface of your skin!!

Your refusal and/or inability to respond to what I posted before in my response to you is a glaring example of what I am talking about:


"And again, douchebag, you continue to show that you don't have the courage of your convictions and/or are scared

to stand up to fpp/sbd by not answering not only the current question I asked about Bush's alleged arrest

but also the alleged ones and also executions of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton as well as Bill Gates and Governor

Cuomo!!!"

No matter what the outcome of the Rittenhouse trial is, imo his mother did a lousy job of raising him

based on his concept of what and wrong is, traveling way out of his way to be a part of a dangerous protest,

let along bring along a rifle!!

^^^^^^

This is how your day started and you got smacked down about his travels and the gun he was carrying and it’s not ending any better pip squeak .

?

 

[savage1]

You’re the equivalent of a pimple on an Elephant’s ass as far as your debating skills go .

I almost feel sorry continually smacking around a CNN brainwashed pip squeak .

Lack of debating skills you say???

Just today I have left you trailing badly in the dust today alone with my FAR and I mean FAR relevant and perceptive and relevant

questions, and DEBATING SKILLS, which are beyond your ability to respond because 1) you don't have anything to offer

which will fly except to avoid the questions, points and analogies made on my part and ask something else in

return and/or 2) you simply don't have the mental capacities to think outside the box and think/intellectualize

on a far deeper level than the surface of your skin!!


And again, douchebag, you continue to show that you don't have the courage of your convictions and/or are scared

to stand up to fpp/sbd by not answering not only the current question I asked about Bush's alleged arrest

but also the alleged ones and also executions of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton as well as Bill Gates and Governor

Cuomo!!!

 

[savage1]

No matter what the outcome of the Rittenhouse trial is, imo his mother did a lousy job of raising him

based on his concept of what and wrong is, traveling way out of his way to be a part of a dangerous protest,

let along bring along a rifle!!

^^^^^^

This is how you day started and you got smacked down and it didn’t end any better pip squeak .

?

I just responded to this in my last post, and you still haven't told me how or/why I got smacked down.

Also please tell me why I am not entitled to my opinion-does it have to agree with your own??

Talk about a break smackdown, you still refuse to answer what is posted below because

you know you have been pinned against the ropes with no response which in your small brain

will fly because well you are well out of your league here-too bad you can't accept that!!


"And again, douchebag, you continue to show that you don't have the courage of your convictions and/or are scared

to stand up to fpp/sbd by not answering not only the current question I asked about Bush's alleged arrest

but also the alleged ones and also executions of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton as well as Bill Gates and Governor

Cuomo!!!"

 

[SportsBookData]

No matter what the outcome of the Rittenhouse trial is, imo his mother did a lousy job of raising him

based on his concept of what and wrong is, traveling way out of his way to be a part of a dangerous protest,

let along bring along a rifle!!

^^^^^^

This is how your day started and you got smacked down about his travels and the gun he was carrying and it’s not ending any better pip squeak .

?

He is the clown of his own circus.

?

 

[SportsBookData]

?

 

[savage1]

He is the clown of his own circus.

?

It is not surprising that anarchists like yourself who would love nothing better than to stage a coup d'etat to reinstate Trump,

love this demented kid and hopes that if he goes free, he simply murders more folks.

 

[savage1]

?

If he goes free, it should be on the condition that he get psychological help, because if he does not, imo

he is a ticking time bomb and will try the same thing again!!

 

[LENBO]

He is the clown of his own circus.

?

I shit something smarter than him this morning .

 

[savage1]

MSN

But wait, wait-not so fast.

Fpp/sbd says devolution is imminent and that Trump will be devolved/reinstated as POTUS.

Perhaps Lenny can comment on whether he agrees with fpp/sbd on this!! lol

 

[LENBO]

New low: 41.9%

?

https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president-biden-job-approval-7320.html