It would be wonderful to have some intelligent debate here, but no one is capable of bringing it. On the old thread, the OP and others left the Tards (you call them commies, we call them Tards) bloodied and battered on the debate floor time and time again. They simply had no argument at all, only lunatic ravings from Salvage and copy and paste jobs from various homosexual websites. If one were keeping score it would be Patriots 100, Tards 0.
Is this what you mean by your debating skills and why you, sbd, and sheriff joe HOE wouldn't dare debate me
and like the cowards you are, PRETEND to put me on ignore!!
"Here is list of things that make the entry of sheriff HOE/sbd doctor success which shows what poor
debaters they are (and I use the word loosely).
This was posted in the Rubber Room but is no longer available after it was dissolved.
Anyways, these are some of the most important things that any intelligent and objective person and/or skilled debater knows
about and defines this trio entry:
Then constantly beg the question and poison the well with their posts.
They present one-way and unsupported opinions as facts to support the narrative.
They are totally inconsistent with their statements, saying one thing to meet their posting need at a given time but
saying something completely different and/or at odds with another related statement at another time.
Along the same lines and actually more serious, they say one thing at one time which completely contradicts what they
said in a previous post hoping that they can get away with it to meet their attention-seeking needs of the day.
They are totally illogical in their posts, or to use legal terminology, they resort to non-sequiturs in just about every post
to draw their conclusions.
In addition, to what I just cited, the term "paradox" defines their posts as they arrive at some kind of conclusion based
on their Swiss cheese logic and thinking that I just cited above.
The problem is that in many cases the conclusion they draw sets up a paradox with some other "logic and reasoning"
they used to arrive at another conclusion which is diametrically opposed to the first one!!
To be blunt, the only audience with whom their posts might fly is 1) one of the other members of he trio;2) unintelligent/
uneducated people and folks who don't have the faintest idea as to how to present a case!!
Unfortunately for them, there are folks like me who can and will point out the stuff have posted today with
the hopes that some folks will understand what I have said about them and to at the very least give consideration to
whenever they read the posts of this thread entry!!"
