I'm Happy, but still amazed

Fat:

Don't twist your comments. You said you would be happy if 100,000 Iraqi soldiers would die.

Why would you want to see that kind of tradegy, if you weren't a blood thristy freak?

Read your own comments.

I didn't want to see anyone die.. period...

 

>Read your own comments.

Maybe you should... I wrote 0:100,000

Just in case you dont know, that's a ratio

 

Fat 1:

I read both our comments: 0: 100,000 is shows you would like to have seen 100,000 Iraqui soldiers/civilians killed.

Why would you want to see such human carnage?

 

>0: 100,000 is shows you would like to have seen 100,000 Iraqui soldiers/civilians killed

What it is showing - is what I said, "Wish the U.S. military had even a higher kill ratio. 0:100,000 would be good."

 

>Why would you want to see such human carnage?

I like to see NO Allied Forces killed and all of the enemy either dead or have surrendered.

I think 100K will be close to the # of Iraqis killed in the end.

 

Fat1:

You think or you hope?

And I still think you're a sick f*uck.

 

[Jabow]

how is it bush can get so many americans together, and stay in Iraqi until what ever time it takes to put things in order in Iraq and spend so much money, but cannot get the gangs and bullies of the streets in America?????????????????

 

[codeworks]

not to mention that he is is backing a 6.2 billion dollar reduction to the Vets. Should be an interesting campaign

 

>And I still think you're a sick f*uck.

But I know how to read/comprehend and know what "ratio" means... LOL

 

[radiofreecostarica]

Most military sources say they encountered much more resistence than they thought.
In fact, frank, i would say that it is a greater compliment to the US armed forces that the Iraqies showed great valor...
or would you prefer that we conquer cowards?