If this trend continues, Bushie COULD BE impeached

[Willie99]

MAYBE is a great word to use when you have no facts.

One historian said that with celebrities, each individual incident might be false, but we can figure out a person's makeup when that same thing happens again and again and again.

Just like Clinton didn't just have one person talk about his propensity to unzip his fly ... the INSIDERS criticizing Bushie and challenging his motives has reached six or seven now.

If one is a fluke, and two is a trend, what is six and what is seven?

Actually Cincy, "maybe" is the word to use when making a subjective or speculative argument.

I don't think my opinion is fact, I'll leave that to you.

So what facts did you just present again?

I know enough to realize I can't speak for a person's state of mind. Evidently, you think otherwise.

I can say Richard Clarke sold books, right. Does that speak to his motive? Maybe

 

[cincy_]

Actually Cincy, "maybe" is the word to use when making a subjective or speculative argument.

I don't think my opinion is fact, I'll leave that to you.

So what facts did you just present again?

I know enough to realize I can't speak for a person's state of mind. Evidently, you think otherwise.

I can say Richard Clarke sold books, right. Does that speak to his motive? Maybe

You need to get over the "sold a book" line. It's not the 11th Commandment.

I took a shit this morning ... but that wasn't the reason I ate.

MAYBE Bushie is just a moron who has based his presidency on cronyism because he can't judge aptitude and ability.

MAYBE you can come up with other MAYBE reasons to explain away people constantly bashing our mental midget... or you can use the "he sold a book" line for everyone. If Colin Powell ever tries to sell a book, you'll be able to use it on him too

Like I said:

One is a fluke, two is a trend ... but what is SEVEN?????

 

[Willie99]

You need to get over the "sold a book" line. It's not the 11th Commandment.

I took a shit this morning ... but that wasn't the reason I ate.

MAYBE Bushie is just a moron who has based his presidency on cronyism because he can't judge aptitude.

MAYBE you can come up with other MAYBE reasons to explain away people constantly bashing our mental midget... or you can use the "he sold a book" line for everyone. If Colin Powell ever tries to sell a book, you'll be able to use it on him too

Like I said:

One is a fluke, two is a trend ... but what is SEVEN?????

I'm sorry Cincy. How's this.

Ever since 1992, W's sole goal in life was to be elected President just so he can start a war with Iraq. Is that better? :toast:

Peace!

 

[zeeman]

He should definitely be impeached. For committing criminal acts, commuting Libby's sentence for his own protection, Contempt of Congress so on and so on!

 

[Romanowski]

Cheney should be impeached before Bush

 

[zeeman]

Who is the puppet and who is the ventriliquist?

 

[cincy_]

I'm sorry Cincy. How's this.

Ever since 1992, W's sole goal in life was to be elected President just so he can start a war with Iraq. Is that better? :toast:

Peace!

CUTE.

That is another technique used by amateur debaters ... this is how it works:

… think of an extreme position to which you would like to link your opponent


… state that position


… Flail your hands in hopelessness and say “since this is what you think, I give up” or shake your head in disbelief and say, “I cannot argue with a person who thinks this way”

I could do the same thing and say:

"Fine, I give up ... I guess the ultimate motive is to write a book ... in your mind, Shakespeare must not be held in high regard ... everything he did was to sell books"

**********************************


You can think whatever you want, my belief is:

• Bushie is just a moron who has based his presidency on cronyism because he can't judge aptitude and ability.
  

• He fell into the hands of Dumbsfeld and Cheney and Wolfie and he believed that he was going to change the Middle East for generations to come.

• He thought he would be looked upon by future generations as “the man who changed the world”

 

[Willie99]

You're speaking for W's state of mind, not me. Your comments clearly indicate you support the notion that W had "the hots to remove Saddam"

You state "7" people in his administration questioned his motives. What are you saying? On his first day in office, W made removing Saddam a priority, right? Isn't that the essence of your position? So what's wrong with my comment again? maybe the year wasn't 1992, but it had to start somewhere. I'm sorry if it makes your position look silly.

Amateur debater? :aktion033 Have you seen your comments in this thread? Something about eating & shitting bringing down the WTC's I think. :thumbsup:

The debate going on here is subjective, just in case you haven't realized that just yet.

Chill, I get it, you hate W, in a very non-partisan way! :toast:

 

[FatTony]

Very simple, and it should be obvious by now.

Clinton signed a bill calling for the removal of Saddam from office.

On the first day in office, at a meeting on National Security, W retained that policy.

Those are the facts.

Saying W hade the hots to remove Saddam is just a tad bit subjective.

Why would somebody say stuff like that? I don't know, maybe they didn't get the job they wanted, maybe for political purposes, maybe for 15 minutes of fame, maybe to sell books or maybe for some combination thereof.

This is beyond ridiculous. Richard Clarke (who worked for both Clinton and Bush) didn't realize that Bush's going into Iraq was a continuation of what the Clinton administration put into motion??? He didn't pick up on this because he's an idiot. He didn't get that memo.

And you want me to believe there's a conspiracy against GWB by two different people. OK


Do you also want to introduce aliens from another planet into the equation somewhere?

 

[Willie99]

This is beyond ridiculous. Richard Clarke (who worked for both Clinton and Bush) didn't realize that Bush's going into Iraq was a continuation of what the Clinton administration put into motion??? He didn't pick up on this because he's an idiot. He didn't get that memo.

And you want me to believe there's a conspiracy against GWB by two different people. OK


Do you also want to introduce aliens from another planet into the equation somewhere?

Actually, it was the aliens who took down the WTC.

So what fact that I presented was wrong again?

Was it Bubba's policy?

Did W retain Bubba's policy?

 

[FatTony]

Actually, it was the aliens who took down the WTC.

So what fact that I presented was wrong again?

Was it Bubba's policy?

Did W retain Bubba's policy?

So what Clinton had a policy that Saddam should go??? Who didn't?? It's not the same as going to war.

So you're saying if Clinton had another term, he would have definitely invaded Iraq. If you're not, this argument is a waste of time.