It can be by far the most important position and fans can still place too much blame/credit on QB performance because it is easy.
I mean if you watched last nights game and your first thought was "Man, Kirk Cousins is killing the Vikings. They should've kept Case Keenum" then you're probably overrating QB play contribution to Vikes early season struggles.
I mean if you watched last nights game and your first thought was "Man, Kirk Cousins is killing the Vikings. They should've kept Case Keenum" then you're probably overrating QB play contribution to Vikes early season struggles.
I dont think anyone is saying Cousins is to blame for the loss other than Runmaker. And that's like trying to argue with an incoherent toddler.
Rams just a better team than the Vikings.
Enfuego and others are just saying that you cant overstate the importance of the quarterback position. Its just silly to try and do that when it's clearly the most important position on the team.
At the end of this season if vikes wins 9 games and lose rd 1, people will legitimately question if they should’ve signed him over bringing Keenum back. And it’s just results oriented.
They had a historically elite defense on 3rd down last season, almost flawless health and a much easier schedule.
QB is important but a lot of factors go into the results. Why Manning sucked 1 season his whole career and has as many SBs from that year as his 15 great years combined.
They had a historically elite defense on 3rd down last season, almost flawless health and a much easier schedule.
QB is important but a lot of factors go into the results. Why Manning sucked 1 season his whole career and has as many SBs from that year as his 15 great years combined.
hno:Blake Bortles
And I'm lower on the Jags than the consensus is.
QB can be the most important position but still lot of ways to skin a cat. Final Four last year was Bortles/Keenum/Foles and some other guy. Granted Foles is deceiving because the Eagles only had him for 3 regular season games, but the point still stands.
This is so laughable.
I'll update the Vikings' record with Captain Cousins every now and then.
And just remember. It's 2018. After Cousin's time in Minnesota he'll move on to another team and be another .500 level QB.
And people will still bouncing on his dick.
2023. Cousins with an amazing record of 54-54-1. Bravo! Or some shit like that.
I'll update the Vikings' record with Captain Cousins every now and then.
And just remember. It's 2018. After Cousin's time in Minnesota he'll move on to another team and be another .500 level QB.
And people will still bouncing on his dick.
2023. Cousins with an amazing record of 54-54-1. Bravo! Or some shit like that.
That really won't matter. The premise of your original post is implying he's a bad QB because he had a fumble at the end of the game on Thursday night, despite the fact that he had a QB rating of 117, 422 yards of passing, a 72% completion ratio, 3 tds, and the offense scored 31 points. In the meantime, the defense gave up 38 points (and yet you put zero blame on them). It's completely irrational. The fact of the matter is, Minnesota's defense over the first 3 games is a shell of it's 2017 self. So while you're posting those numbers, make sure you post those defensive stats along side them. You're not going to win a lot of games if your defense gives up more than 31 points. As Patsfan stated earlier in this thread for you and the other clueless poster....
