If a book boots you for winning, is it unethical to come back under an alias?

[peskypup]

It's a dog eat dog kind of a business. If a book treats me well I treat the book well, and have several times pointed out to decent books that they graded a lost bet as a win, and so on.

If a book plays silly buggers, then my gloves are off. I am going to play harder and dirtier than they are.

So far NONE of the books I have multiple accounts with have taken any of the secondary funds, though some have limited the secondary accounts.

But it takes them a long time to limit them, and I have LOTS of friends who will take money off me every month in return for letting me bet under their names.

 

[Journeyman]

Its not Bowman's....sorry I didn't answer earlier.

 

[SportSavant]

what the f*** is a point of a message board if 'message board politics' prevent you from naming the book in Question?

who cares...name the book....

 

[KeithRichard]

My guess it is Carib.

 

[Journeyman]

Savant, don`t tell me what to do or suggest that there are 'forum politics' involved...

Its becoming more and more obvious you`re here to your spread 'theories' on everything, and becoming more apparent you are just here to question everything....I saw that B.S. you started in the other thread regarding a BOOK THAT DID NOT ADVERTISE HERE...this is a business Savant, why should The Shrink allow any book to come in and try to make a name for themselves at his expense?

Jesus Christ this is why I stay out of anything remotely controversial anymore, the slightest hint and you have 5 guys calling foul....my last reply in this thread