But he didn't pay for the football ticket.......I guess nobody paid for the football ticket. They were giving them away.
When McDonald's sees that there are not many empty seats, then they want to advertise more.
Thus expanding the cycle.
Did you beat everybody up who was sitting around you eating a hotdog?
Did you explain that what they were doing is evil and you are the only smart human being to see that?
OK, did you run onto the field an steal the cowhide footballs and give them a proper burial while telling the referees to not use them anymore?
Do you go to the manufacturers of the clothes that you wear, go through all of their records, find out if those companies that they deal with use animals to test the dye for the colors of your garments?
When McDonald's sees that there are not many empty seats, then they want to advertise more.
Thus expanding the cycle.
Did you beat everybody up who was sitting around you eating a hotdog?
Did you explain that what they were doing is evil and you are the only smart human being to see that?
OK, did you run onto the field an steal the cowhide footballs and give them a proper burial while telling the referees to not use them anymore?
Do you go to the manufacturers of the clothes that you wear, go through all of their records, find out if those companies that they deal with use animals to test the dye for the colors of your garments?
First off, no, it is you guys who think the grass is purple. It is an undeniable fact that human beings are herbivores. That can't be argued logically because all the facts are on my side.
As for me buying a football ticket from a person who had an extra ticket does not count. If a million people buy something and then 100,000 of those people sell the product that they bought, the manufacturer doesn't have to produce an extra 100,000. Does this make any sense to you?
You are so fucking stupid. Supply for that can't be extended, example being a ticket to a stadium that only holds X number of people, can't be added on to. Are you too fucking retarded to understand this. It's laughable when you idiots think that you are about to make sense but in reality you make yourself look like an ass.
Dear HeatOhio / RealEstateDonkey,
Please stop ignoring the multiple questions on here that are
exposing your freak, fridge, terrorist philosophy:
1. When you and your insane freak cohorts firebomb
restaurants, what do you do with the animals that you kill
in the firebombing?
2. Do you drink milk, or eat any dairy product?
3. Do you wear any clothes with dye, or animal fibers? Do you
have any leather in your house?
4. Why do you still support football/baseball/basketball... when they
all play with dead animal skins? (I know you tried to answer this,
but your answer was a complete joke - try again donkey boy)
5. Why do you continue to choose to get in your car every single
day, knowing that you are killing insects with your car - when you
could ride your bike, and kill many less, and maybe even none?
You are a sentient animal killer by choice every single day chump.
6. Why don't you kill yourself right now, since according to your
freak philosophy, you deserve to die for killing insects every single day.
Remember to think about this one when you choose to get in your
car tomorrow, KILLING many innocent insects.
Please stop ignoring the multiple questions on here that are
exposing your freak, fridge, terrorist philosophy:
1. When you and your insane freak cohorts firebomb
restaurants, what do you do with the animals that you kill
in the firebombing?
2. Do you drink milk, or eat any dairy product?
3. Do you wear any clothes with dye, or animal fibers? Do you
have any leather in your house?
4. Why do you still support football/baseball/basketball... when they
all play with dead animal skins? (I know you tried to answer this,
but your answer was a complete joke - try again donkey boy)
5. Why do you continue to choose to get in your car every single
day, knowing that you are killing insects with your car - when you
could ride your bike, and kill many less, and maybe even none?
You are a sentient animal killer by choice every single day chump.
6. Why don't you kill yourself right now, since according to your
freak philosophy, you deserve to die for killing insects every single day.
Remember to think about this one when you choose to get in your
car tomorrow, KILLING many innocent insects.
I've asked many questions that nobody is willing to answer. How convienent that you unededucated assholes get to ignore facts and questions yet I'm promted to answer every single thing, even if it doesn't make any sense what so ever. I answered number 4, just because you're not smart enough to understand the answer does not make it a joke. Number 1, there are never any animals inside a building when attacked. No ALF attack has killed a single person or animal. That is indeed a fact. Number 2, no I don't drink any dairy product. Number 3, I buy mostly organic clothing. Some things I buy are not but don't use animal products in dyes seeing as how it is a pretty uncommon practice. No leather, wool, silk or fur in the house or on anything we own. I've answered number 5 and 6 is based on the theory that I'm doing something wrong so therefore is just a plain old stupid question. But as the old saying goes. There are no stupid questions, only stupid people.
Now on to you. Why do you continue to ignore the facts that I present that make it obvious that we are herbivores?
REP,
You are a liar.
Every single ALF attack kills animals - as well as the fact that
you kill animals every single day by your own choice.
http://www.animalliberationfront.com/Philosophy/Morality/Biology/InsectAR.htm
#39 What about insects? Do they have rights too?
Before considering the issue of rights, let us first address the question "What about insects?". Strictly speaking, insects are small invertebrate animals of the class Insecta, having an adult stage characterized by three pairs of legs, a segmented body with three major divisions, and usually two pairs of wings. We'll adopt the looser definition, which includes similar invertebrate animals such as spiders, centipedes, and ticks.
Insects have a ganglionic nervous system, in contrast to the central nervous system of vertebrates. Such a system is characterized by local aggregates of neurons, called ganglia, that are associated with, and specialized for, the body segment with which they are co-located. There are interconnections between ganglia but these connections function not so much as a global integrating pathway, but rather for local segmental coordination. For example, the waves of leg motion that propagate along the body of a centipede are mediated by the intersegmental connections.
In some species the cephalic ganglia are large and complex enough to support very complex behavior (e.g., the lobster and octopus). The cuttlefish (not an insect but another invertebrate with a ganglionic nervous system) is claimed by some to be about as intelligent as a dog.
Insects are capable of primitive learning and do exhibit what many would characterize as intelligence. Spiders are known for their skills and craftiness; whether this can all be dismissed as instinct is arguable. Certainly, bees can learn in a limited way. When offered a reward from a perch of a certain color, they return first to perches of that color. They also learn the location of food and transmit that information to their colleagues. The learning, however, tends to be highly specialized and applicable to only limited domains.
In addition to a primitive mental life as described above, there is some evidence that insects can experience pain and suffering. The earthworm nervous system, for example, secretes an opiate substance when the earthworm is injured. Similar responses are seen in vertebrates and are generally accepted to be a mechanism for the attenuation of pain. On the other hand, the opiates are also implicated in functions not associated with analgesia, such as thermoregulation and appetite control. Nevertheless, the association of secretion with tissue injury is highly suggestive.
Earthworms also wriggle quite vigorously when impaled on a hook. In possible opposition to this are other observations. For example, the abdomen of a feeding wasp can be clipped off and the head may go on sucking (presumably in no distress?).
Singer quotes three criteria for deciding if an organism has the capacity to suffer from pain: 1) there are behavioral indications, 2) there is an appropriate nervous system, and 3) there is an evolutionary usefulness for the experience of pain. These criteria seem to satisfied for insects, if only in a primitive way.
Now we are equipped to tackle the issue of insect rights. First, one might argue that the issue is not so compelling as for other animals because industries are not built around the exploitation of insects. But this is untrue; large industries are built around honey production, silk production, and cochineal/carmine production, and, of course, mass insect death results from our use of insecticides. Even if the argument were true, it should not prevent us from attempting to be consistent in the application of our principles to all animals. Insects are a part of the Animal Kingdom and some special arguments would be required to exclude them from the general AR argument.
