because that is all he takes. HE doesn't have an ATS winner this season. Maybe one. all of his wins have been moneyline. Which do not count towards records. Cuz anyone can pick winners. sooo he should of loaded up on the ML like I said because he doesn't take ATS unless it is a dog which he can't pick if his life was on the line because he is a sheep like you
Pretty obvious u have been pointed out to be a clown. 33% of spewed garbage. Proof is in the pudding. U were asked to post thru NBA playoffs to prove ur point and u list first few days and quit posting. Bout proof that everyone saw here. Maybe in ur and psycho alter ego mind ur still hitting over 120%
Well, not sure how much further we let this thread go before it heads to RR.
I've left it because loomis says he doesn't have a problem with drama in his thread.
But remember fellas that just because loomis is allowing it, doesn't mean it's allowed in anyone else's picks-threads...
I've left it because loomis says he doesn't have a problem with drama in his thread.
But remember fellas that just because loomis is allowing it, doesn't mean it's allowed in anyone else's picks-threads...
i don't think you guys are understanding.... ML favorites shouldn't count, because you are laying big juice. This dude played a -450 OKC ML against the Lakers. Oh you really got them there didn't ya? Football ML for DOGS. yes that counts. Because in order for the DOG to cash it has to cover the spread as well. Not rocket science here guys. Yes, anyone can pick ML favorite winners. If it were as easy as everyone thought, everyone would gamble and just play ML favorites and cash. But there is something called "odds".
