I Love it when LeBron Loses

Search

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,730
Tokens
You aren't going to understand it if you think that Brick is almost as good as a free throw shooter as Bird. Look at the 3 point % of each.
I’m not debating who a better catch and shoot shooter is. FT % is generally a better indicator of that .

I was basically a pure catch and shoot player in high school. I was good at it, but I played with guys who could shoot well from 3 off dribble, not as efficient at FT shooters generally.

It is quite a different shot in high school, let alone NBA
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Aug 21, 2002
Messages
8,382
Tokens
I’m not debating who a better catch and shoot shooter is. FT % is generally a better indicator of that .

I was basically a pure catch and shoot player in high school. I was good at it, but I played with guys who could shoot well from 3 off dribble, not as efficient at FT shooters generally.

It is quite a different shot in high school, let alone NBA
My mistake on the Bird statement. I meant to say 3 pointers. Bird and Brick hit close to the same % on 3s. Give both an open look and it's not close.

I'd take Bird and Jordan compared to Brick for both catch and shoot and creating their own shot. It's just that Bird and Jordan had to create their own shot more than Brick from a distance.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,730
Tokens
My mistake on the Bird statement. I meant to say 3 pointers. Bird and Brick hit close to the same % on 3s. Give both an open look and it's not close.

I'd take Bird and Jordan compared to Brick for both catch and shoot and creating their own shot. It's just that Bird and Jordan had to create their own shot more than Brick from a distance.
I would take Bird above both in catch and shoot situation for sure. Bird would probably roll them both in a game of HORSE.

Jordan really excelled at curling off screens and getting to his spot in the mid range that way. No one in history better than him at that.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,730
Tokens
I get what you're saying about general positive correlation between FT and 3-pt

But there are many cases of mid range guys who are great at the line, but genuinely bad 3-pt shooters

DeMar Derozan is a good example in the modern NBA. He is a great midrange player and foul shooter, but he has a horrible stroke from 3
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Aug 21, 2002
Messages
8,382
Tokens
I get what you're saying about general positive correlation between FT and 3-pt

But there are many cases of mid range guys who are great at the line, but genuinely bad 3-pt shooters

DeMar Derozan is a good example in the modern NBA. He is a great midrange player and foul shooter, but he has a horrible stroke from 3
I've noticed in some of my posts I type FT when I meant 3 pt. Agree positive correlation FT to 3 but I was talking more of the correlation between attempts and percentage made with Jordan. The more attempts he had in a year, the higher the 3 pt percentage. And it didn't have to do with getting better since I was looking at consecutive years.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Aug 21, 2002
Messages
8,382
Tokens
My contention is that the amount of forced 3s stay the same every year. Open 3s fluctuate. The more open 3s, the higher the percentage.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
13,281
Tokens
338609629357cbef2c0badb6edbf8d06~2.jpg
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,698
Messages
13,558,473
Members
100,669
Latest member
nhacai68gamebaigreen
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com