The sick thing is that they root for the US President to fail, and root for Putin to trump him, just to fuel their Obama hate. A genuine Patriot wants America to succeed, no matter the President.
Putin has been trumping America for years, no matter the President, as the evidence shows. Doubt these phony Patriots were rooting for Bush to be out-trumped though.
Putin loves his country.
Of course we want the Kenyan to fail, along with the Hungarian Nazi (Soros) and Iranian Muslim Valerie Jarrett. None have America's best interests at heart. In a sane world, the Sergeant at Arms would arrest the illegal alien foreigner and this dark cloud hanging over America since 2008 would finally be lifted.
The fact is, if you love something, you don't want to "fundamentally transform" it...so of course we want him to fail. Duh!
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=11594
[h=2]Sarah Palin Thinks She Predicted A Russian Invasion Of Ukraine (w/Video)[/h]
Posted by Mark on March 1, 2014 at 12:09 pm.
In addition to being able to see Russia from her house, Sarah Palin now thinks that she was able to see into the future. On her Facebook page Palin is bragging that she predicted that Russia would invade Ukraine if Barack Obama were elected President:
Be Sure To “LIKE” News Corpse On Facebook However, the evidence of Palin’s alleged prophecy was a trifling passage from a campaign speech she gave in October of 2008. The substance of her remarks fall somewhat short of the clairvoyance about which she is boasting. If you look beyond the brief reference to Russia, it is apparent that her prognostication skills are sorely lacking. Nevertheless, the right-wing media machine is in full distribution mode to hype this phony grab for undeserved credit. Everyone from the lie-riddled Fox Nation to Breitbart News is regurgitating Palin’s boast. But the truth is readily available in her stump speech forecast (video below) that contained what she called the “Four Crisis Scenarios” that would accompany an Obama administration.
Crisis Scenario #1 was that Obama was “proposing to meet with the regime in Tehran that vows to wipe Israel off the earth.” Of course this never happened, so Palin is starting out with a wild swing and a miss. What did happen was that sanctions implemented by the Obama administration, and diplomatic efforts to unify the international community to oppose Iran’s nuclear weapons program, forced Iran to capitulate, cease development, and agree to inspections.
Crisis Scenario #2 concerned Obama’s advocacy of “sending our U.S. military into Pakistan, without the approval of the Pakistani government, invading the sovereign territory of a troubled partner in the war on terrorism.” Indeed, Obama held open the option of taking action to pursue dangerous terrorists when our so-called allies refused to do so. However, this is the policy that rid the world of Osama Bin Laden, a conclusion that would not have been achieved had Palin’s protocol been in effect.
Crisis Scenario #3 criticized Obama’s position on Iraq when he “voted to cut off funding for our troops leaving our young men and women at grave risk in the war zone.” In reality Obama eliminated the grave risks faced by our troops when he pledged to end the Iraq war and bring the troops home. It was Palin who advocated leaving those young men and women in the war zone.
Crisis Scenario #4 is the money scenario. This is where Palin said that “After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama’s reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia’s Putin to invade Ukraine next.” Notice that Palin did not say what Obama’s response was or why it would encourage Putin in future military endeavors. For the record, here is what both Obama and John McCain said at the time:
To a certain extent Palin got lucky in that she happened to mention the Ukraine one time during a campaign rally. But overall her speech was littered with inaccuracies and failed vision. It is surprising that she would bother to remind people of her foreign policy inadequacies. She didn’t predict the citizen uprising in Ukraine, or the ouster of it’s president, or the Russian presence in Crimea, a region whose population is majority Russian and staunchly pro-Russia. And to characterize her 2008 remarks as predictive of what is taking place today is nothing short of delusional.
[h=2]Sarah Palin Thinks She Predicted A Russian Invasion Of Ukraine (w/Video)[/h]
Posted by Mark on March 1, 2014 at 12:09 pm.
In addition to being able to see Russia from her house, Sarah Palin now thinks that she was able to see into the future. On her Facebook page Palin is bragging that she predicted that Russia would invade Ukraine if Barack Obama were elected President:
Palin: Yes, I could see this one from Alaska. I’m usually not one to Told-Ya-So, but I did.
Palin and her conservative comrades are taking advantage of events in Ukraine to reignite their cold war passion for conflict with the former Soviet empire. This is a brief diversion from the Putin love-fest that they have been consumed with for the past few months.
Be Sure To “LIKE” News Corpse On Facebook However, the evidence of Palin’s alleged prophecy was a trifling passage from a campaign speech she gave in October of 2008. The substance of her remarks fall somewhat short of the clairvoyance about which she is boasting. If you look beyond the brief reference to Russia, it is apparent that her prognostication skills are sorely lacking. Nevertheless, the right-wing media machine is in full distribution mode to hype this phony grab for undeserved credit. Everyone from the lie-riddled Fox Nation to Breitbart News is regurgitating Palin’s boast. But the truth is readily available in her stump speech forecast (video below) that contained what she called the “Four Crisis Scenarios” that would accompany an Obama administration.
Crisis Scenario #1 was that Obama was “proposing to meet with the regime in Tehran that vows to wipe Israel off the earth.” Of course this never happened, so Palin is starting out with a wild swing and a miss. What did happen was that sanctions implemented by the Obama administration, and diplomatic efforts to unify the international community to oppose Iran’s nuclear weapons program, forced Iran to capitulate, cease development, and agree to inspections.
Crisis Scenario #2 concerned Obama’s advocacy of “sending our U.S. military into Pakistan, without the approval of the Pakistani government, invading the sovereign territory of a troubled partner in the war on terrorism.” Indeed, Obama held open the option of taking action to pursue dangerous terrorists when our so-called allies refused to do so. However, this is the policy that rid the world of Osama Bin Laden, a conclusion that would not have been achieved had Palin’s protocol been in effect.
Crisis Scenario #3 criticized Obama’s position on Iraq when he “voted to cut off funding for our troops leaving our young men and women at grave risk in the war zone.” In reality Obama eliminated the grave risks faced by our troops when he pledged to end the Iraq war and bring the troops home. It was Palin who advocated leaving those young men and women in the war zone.
Crisis Scenario #4 is the money scenario. This is where Palin said that “After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama’s reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia’s Putin to invade Ukraine next.” Notice that Palin did not say what Obama’s response was or why it would encourage Putin in future military endeavors. For the record, here is what both Obama and John McCain said at the time:
Obama: There is no possible justification for these attacks. I reiterate my call for Russia to stop its bombing campaign, to stop flights of Russian aircraft in Georgian airspace, and to withdraw its ground forces from Georgia.
McCain: Russia should immediately and unconditionally cease its military operations and withdraw all forces from sovereign Georgian territory.
If Obama was indecisive and lacking moral fortitude, it was in exactly the same measure as Palin’s running mate, McCain. Palin’s remarks were nothing more than the typical carping that occurs in campaigns that have nothing of substance to say. Instead, Palin asserts an absurd scenario wherein Putin would require “encouragement” to engage in military aggression. If that’s so, what did George W. Bush do to encourage Putin to invade Georgia?
To a certain extent Palin got lucky in that she happened to mention the Ukraine one time during a campaign rally. But overall her speech was littered with inaccuracies and failed vision. It is surprising that she would bother to remind people of her foreign policy inadequacies. She didn’t predict the citizen uprising in Ukraine, or the ouster of it’s president, or the Russian presence in Crimea, a region whose population is majority Russian and staunchly pro-Russia. And to characterize her 2008 remarks as predictive of what is taking place today is nothing short of delusional.
Putin loves his country.
Of course we want the Kenyan to fail, along with the Hungarian Nazi (Soros) and Iranian Muslim Valerie Jarrett. None have America's best interests at heart. In a sane world, the Sergeant at Arms would arrest the illegal alien foreigner and this dark cloud hanging over America since 2008 would finally be lifted.
The fact is, if you love something, you don't want to "fundamentally transform" it...so of course we want him to fail. Duh!
Soros was not a Nazi, you sick, vile POS. Valerie Jarrett is Not a Muslim, not that it would matter, and, of Course, The American President is not a Kenyan. You, OTOH are insane and a liar.
You left the sane world a LONG time ago, Casper. This is probably the last sane thought you had.
The gates of hell are about to open up on Obama, the likes of which we haven't ever seen in our lifetimes.
It's worth remembering the Clinton's have utterly DESTROYED anyone that has dared get between them and POWER, and that path is littered with bodies -- literally.
If anyone believes the Clinton's are just going to fade quietly into the night for the good of the Democrat Party, you haven't been paying attention for the last 2 decades...
"Homophobic Muslim Coke-User" will be household words by next Friday, and the Clintonites at Moron.Org and Media Matters aren’t about to let their gravy train go away.
The Washington Democrat Establishment has private jet fuel bills, and waterfront mansions payments to pay for, and they are not about to let some brash upstart upset the cart they have spent so many years, and so much money building...
The Clintons are so narcissistic that they will happily rip the throat out of the party, and drag it down in flames with them.
I'm kinda looking forward to the next week or so.
:toast:
Putin loves his country.
Of course we want the Kenyan to fail, along with the Hungarian Nazi (Soros) and Iranian Muslim Valerie Jarrett. None have America's best interests at heart. In a sane world, the Sergeant at Arms would arrest the illegal alien foreigner and this dark cloud hanging over America since 2008 would finally be lifted.
The fact is, if you love something, you don't want to "fundamentally transform" it...so of course we want him to fail. Duh!
You do realize Valerie Jarrett was born to American parents who were doctors overseas and she has never been a Muslim? Or do you just ignore basic facts?
