And if you have any doubt that the last image is real:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/receipt.asp
http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/receipt.asp
[h=1]
[ Amazing that people are actually dumb enough to follow and support these
lying shit-stains. ]
Politics: Wasserman Schultz: 'Nothing any Democrat said about Obamacare was not true'[/h]
Image Credit: Wasserman Schultz: 'Nothing Obama or I said about Obamacare was not true' [h=3]Published by: Robert Laurie on Tuesday November 5th, 2013[/h]
She also thinks that "arguably" the website could work better
The inside of Debbie Wasserman Schultz's mind must be a lot like Disneyland. It stands apart from the rest of the world - a colorful, carefree, fanciful place where imagination has triumphed over the reality in which real people spend the majority of their lives. There's simply no other way to explain the DNC chairwoman's latest claim.
Brace yourself, because Wasserman Schultz's hubris here is simply astonishing.
Democrats told us that Obamacare would lower rates and deductibles. That was not true.
Democrats told us that the signup process would be a few simple clicks on a website. That was not true.
Democrats told us that snail mail and telephone signups would be just as simple. That was not true.
Democrats told us that the American people supported the legislation. That was not true.
Democrats tell us that the American people still support the legislation. That is still not true.
...and of course, there's the whopper. It is, quite possibly, the single greatest, and most oft-told, bald-faced lie in the history of the White House.
Democrats, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and President Barack Obama told us that "If you like your plan, you will be able to keep it. Period." That was - and is - not true.
Yet, Ms. Schultz has the audacity to appear before her MSNBC allies and claim that no Democrat who supports Obamacare has ever lied about anything?
I often write that Obama and his cronies must have some kind of mental affliction that allows them to easily disassociate themselves from reality. Usually when I do this, I'm at least half-joking. Now however, as the endless array of Obamacare lies unravel before us - and the administration faithful continue to deny the existence of a single falsehood - I'm honestly starting to wonder.
Is it possible that these people really have some sort of clinical, pathological disorder? If not, do they not understand how hopelessly out-of-touch they sound?
Ms. Schultz's complete comments - including the ground-breaking concept that web-based signups could "arguably" be working better - appear below. Seriously. "Arguably?"
[ Amazing that people are actually dumb enough to follow and support these
lying shit-stains. ]
Politics: Wasserman Schultz: 'Nothing any Democrat said about Obamacare was not true'[/h]
Image Credit: Wasserman Schultz: 'Nothing Obama or I said about Obamacare was not true' [h=3]Published by: Robert Laurie on Tuesday November 5th, 2013[/h]
She also thinks that "arguably" the website could work better
The inside of Debbie Wasserman Schultz's mind must be a lot like Disneyland. It stands apart from the rest of the world - a colorful, carefree, fanciful place where imagination has triumphed over the reality in which real people spend the majority of their lives. There's simply no other way to explain the DNC chairwoman's latest claim.
Brace yourself, because Wasserman Schultz's hubris here is simply astonishing.
"There was nothing about what President Obama - or that I or any other Democrat supporting the Affordable Care Act - said that was not true."
Yes, that's a real quote. Let's check the record, shall we?
Democrats told us that Obamacare would lower rates and deductibles. That was not true.
Democrats told us that the signup process would be a few simple clicks on a website. That was not true.
Democrats told us that snail mail and telephone signups would be just as simple. That was not true.
Democrats told us that the American people supported the legislation. That was not true.
Democrats tell us that the American people still support the legislation. That is still not true.
...and of course, there's the whopper. It is, quite possibly, the single greatest, and most oft-told, bald-faced lie in the history of the White House.
Democrats, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and President Barack Obama told us that "If you like your plan, you will be able to keep it. Period." That was - and is - not true.
Yet, Ms. Schultz has the audacity to appear before her MSNBC allies and claim that no Democrat who supports Obamacare has ever lied about anything?
I often write that Obama and his cronies must have some kind of mental affliction that allows them to easily disassociate themselves from reality. Usually when I do this, I'm at least half-joking. Now however, as the endless array of Obamacare lies unravel before us - and the administration faithful continue to deny the existence of a single falsehood - I'm honestly starting to wonder.
Is it possible that these people really have some sort of clinical, pathological disorder? If not, do they not understand how hopelessly out-of-touch they sound?
Ms. Schultz's complete comments - including the ground-breaking concept that web-based signups could "arguably" be working better - appear below. Seriously. "Arguably?"
Listen to this nasty lying whore try and tell the American people that "nothing Obama or herself, or any Democrat said about ObamaCare was untrue"
BWHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
UN-fucking believable, and the brainless libtards lap it up.
[video=youtube;6dLXGR5G6ak]https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UUmaT1G9XjC0brDQ8t12Bd5w&v=6dLXGR5G6ak#t=120[/video]
This lying c*nt is the f'ing Chair for the DNC?
BWHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
UN-fucking believable, and the brainless libtards lap it up.
[video=youtube;6dLXGR5G6ak]https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UUmaT1G9XjC0brDQ8t12Bd5w&v=6dLXGR5G6ak#t=120[/video]
This lying c*nt is the f'ing Chair for the DNC?
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Wednesday told Congress that it isn't worth delaying the implementation of new Obamacare rules, or taking down the botched HealthCare.gov website, in spite of the ongoing problems.
"Delaying the Affordable Care Act wouldn't delay people's cancer or diabetes or Parkinson's," Sebelius testified to the Senate Finance Committee. "For millions of Americans, delay is not an option."
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
I guess she can’t wait to do some more of this:
Sebelius won’t waive regulation for girl with five weeks to live: ‘Someone lives and someone dies’
June 4, 2013 | 1:07 pm
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius rebuffed an appeal from Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa., on behalf of a girl who needs a lung transplant but can't get one because of a federal regulation that prevents her from qualifying for a transplant.
“Please, suspend the rules until we look at this policy,” Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa., asked Sebelius during a House hearing Tuesday on behalf of Sarah Murnaghan, a 10-year-old girl who needs a lung transplant. She can’t qualify for an adult lung transplant until the age of 12, according to federal regulations, but Sebelius has the authority to waive that rule on her behalf. The pediatric lungs for which she qualifies aren’t available.
“I would suggest, sir, that, again, this is an incredibly agonizing situation where someone lives and someone dies,” Sebelius replied. “The medical evidence and the transplant doctors who are making the rule — and have had the rule in place since 2005 making a delineation between pediatric and adult lungs, because lungs are different than other organs — that it’s based on the survivability [chances].”
More: http://washingtonexaminer.com/sebelius-wont-waive-regulation-for-girl-with-five-weeks-to-live-someone-lives-and-someone-dies/article/2531097
"Delaying the Affordable Care Act wouldn't delay people's cancer or diabetes or Parkinson's," Sebelius testified to the Senate Finance Committee. "For millions of Americans, delay is not an option."
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
I guess she can’t wait to do some more of this:
Sebelius won’t waive regulation for girl with five weeks to live: ‘Someone lives and someone dies’
June 4, 2013 | 1:07 pm
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius rebuffed an appeal from Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa., on behalf of a girl who needs a lung transplant but can't get one because of a federal regulation that prevents her from qualifying for a transplant.
“Please, suspend the rules until we look at this policy,” Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa., asked Sebelius during a House hearing Tuesday on behalf of Sarah Murnaghan, a 10-year-old girl who needs a lung transplant. She can’t qualify for an adult lung transplant until the age of 12, according to federal regulations, but Sebelius has the authority to waive that rule on her behalf. The pediatric lungs for which she qualifies aren’t available.
“I would suggest, sir, that, again, this is an incredibly agonizing situation where someone lives and someone dies,” Sebelius replied. “The medical evidence and the transplant doctors who are making the rule — and have had the rule in place since 2005 making a delineation between pediatric and adult lungs, because lungs are different than other organs — that it’s based on the survivability [chances].”
More: http://washingtonexaminer.com/sebelius-wont-waive-regulation-for-girl-with-five-weeks-to-live-someone-lives-and-someone-dies/article/2531097
Graph of the day, this one is especially for AKFratFraud:
Data extracted on: November 12, 2013 (11:12:44 AM)
[h=4]Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey[/h]
Series Id: LNS11300000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Labor Force Participation Rate
Labor force status: Civilian labor force participation rate
Type of data: Percent or rate
Age: 16 years and over
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
Data extracted on: November 12, 2013 (11:12:44 AM)
[h=4]Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey[/h]
Series Id: LNS11300000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Labor Force Participation Rate
Labor force status: Civilian labor force participation rate
Type of data: Percent or rate
Age: 16 years and over
http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
[h=1]720k Americans Leave Labor Force in October[/h]
827
17
1324
10
Email Article Print article Send a Tip
by Mike Flynn 8 Nov 2013 1230 post a comment
[h=2]On Friday, the Labor Department reported that 720,000 Americans left the labor force. This exodus pushed the labor force participation rate down to 62.8%, the lowest level since 1978. One out of three adults is neither working nor actively looking for work.[/h] Some observers attribute the sharp drop to the shutdown and the furloughed federal workers. Even if that were the case, and it is unclear why these workers would be counted as not in the labor force, the number of Americans exiting is still significant. The total number of adults not in the labor force in October rose 932,000 to almost 92 million. (see note below)
Overall, the jobs report showed employers adding 204,000 jobs in October. Almost half of these job gains were in the retail and hospitality sectors. The adult population, however, grew by 213,000, meaning that the better than expected jobs number fell short of keeping pace with population growth. The economy needs to add many more jobs to bring discouraged workers back into the labor force.
In spite of the gain in jobs, the overall number of Americans with a job fell by 735,000, to less than 144 million. Just 58.3% of adults were employed in October.
The headline number on the October jobs report was good. Gaining jobs is obviously better than shedding them. The continued sluggish pace of the economy, however, is causing ever more Americans to give up looking for work.
UPDATE: The Bureau of Labor Statistics, responsible for compiling the jobs report, has told CNBC that the government shutdown "categorically" is not a factor in the labor market exodus. It never really made any sense that furloughed workers would be counted as leaving the labor force, but we now have confirmation they weren't. The 720,000 workers leaving the labor force is one of the largest exoduses in history.
827
17
1324
10
Email Article Print article Send a Tip
by Mike Flynn 8 Nov 2013 1230 post a comment
Overall, the jobs report showed employers adding 204,000 jobs in October. Almost half of these job gains were in the retail and hospitality sectors. The adult population, however, grew by 213,000, meaning that the better than expected jobs number fell short of keeping pace with population growth. The economy needs to add many more jobs to bring discouraged workers back into the labor force.
In spite of the gain in jobs, the overall number of Americans with a job fell by 735,000, to less than 144 million. Just 58.3% of adults were employed in October.
The headline number on the October jobs report was good. Gaining jobs is obviously better than shedding them. The continued sluggish pace of the economy, however, is causing ever more Americans to give up looking for work.
UPDATE: The Bureau of Labor Statistics, responsible for compiling the jobs report, has told CNBC that the government shutdown "categorically" is not a factor in the labor market exodus. It never really made any sense that furloughed workers would be counted as leaving the labor force, but we now have confirmation they weren't. The 720,000 workers leaving the labor force is one of the largest exoduses in history.
[h=1]Quinnipiac Poll: Obama's Approval Rating Hits New Low[/h]
Wednesday, 13 Nov 2013 07:36 AM
By Todd Beamon
Share:
More . . .
A A |
Email Us |
Print |
Forward Article
President Barack Obama's approval rating is at its lowest level since he entered the White House in 2009, with a majority saying for the first time in a Quinnipiac University poll that the president is not honest and trustworthy.
The survey of 2,545 voters conducted Nov. 6-11 found that only 39 percent of respondents approved of Obama's job performance, compared with 54 percent who didn't. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.9 percentage points.
Among women voters, one of Obama's biggest support groups, only 40 percent said they approved of his performance in the White House, versus 51 percent who said they did not.
Wednesday, 13 Nov 2013 07:36 AM
By Todd Beamon
Share:
More . . .
A A |
Email Us |
Print |
Forward Article
-
- 1
inShare
President Barack Obama's approval rating is at its lowest level since he entered the White House in 2009, with a majority saying for the first time in a Quinnipiac University poll that the president is not honest and trustworthy.
The survey of 2,545 voters conducted Nov. 6-11 found that only 39 percent of respondents approved of Obama's job performance, compared with 54 percent who didn't. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.9 percentage points.
Among women voters, one of Obama's biggest support groups, only 40 percent said they approved of his performance in the White House, versus 51 percent who said they did not.
