[ According to the libtard maggots on the left, it's cool to hurl homophobic slurs, as long as you're doing to a Republican. Funny how that works. ]
[h=1]Jimmy Kimmel Under Fire for Hurling ‘Homophobic Slurs’ at Hannity and Trump[/h]
Christopher Polk/Getty
by BEN KEW7 Apr 201826,323
[h=2]Late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel is facing criticism after repeatedly making lewd jokes suggesting a homosexual relationship between Fox News host Sean Hannity and President Donald Trump.[/h]During a heated Twitter exchange between Kimmel and Hannity, the ABC funnyman repeatedly suggested that President Trump and Hannity were having a sexual relationship.
Jimmy Kimmel
✔@jimmykimmel
When your clown makeup rubs off on Trump’s ass, does it make his butt look like a Creamsicle? https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982326756240756736 …
2:03 PM - Apr 6, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“Don’t worry – just keep tweeting – you’ll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO,” Kimmel later responded after Hannity called him a “pervert” and “Harvey Weinstein Jr.”
Jimmy Kimmel
✔@jimmykimmel
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
4:26 PM - Apr 6, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
However, Kimmel’s vile jokes sparked a backlash from several social media users, who accused him of alienating his LGBT audience and trivializing their lifestyle choices.
“YOU THINK YOURE JUST FEUDING HANNITY, CONGRATS PAL YOU JUST ALIENATED YOUR LGBT VIEWERS,” one user named Scott Linnen wrote, adding that Kimmel’s behavior had made him “physically ill.”
Jimmy Kimmel
✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Scott Linnen@ScottLinnen
YOU THINK YOURE JUST FEUDING HANNITY, CONGRATS PAL YOU JUST ALIENATED YOUR LGBT VIEWERS @jimmykimmel
6:39 PM - Apr 6, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Jimmy Kimmel
✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Scott Linnen@ScottLinnen
I’m physically ill over you making gay a punchline in 2018. With all the hatred out there, this is how you get laughs & RTs @jimmykimmel
6:37 PM - Apr 6, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“So, it’s OK for you to make homophobic slurs? What an asshole,” added one individual.
Jimmy Kimmel
✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Zarba@ZarbaNotZorba
So, it's OK for you to make homophobic slurs? What an asshole.
6:44 PM - Apr 6, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Another person accused Kimmel of liberal hypocrisy.
Jimmy Kimmel
✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Old Submariner
@BerrinAndro
Haha..is this the part where liberals are OK with sexual orientation jokes as long as it's about conservatives? Funny stuff.
4:36 PM - Apr 6, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
“Stop making shitty fucking gay jokes,” added Ryan Houlihan. “Hire me to write you better gay jokes. Hire any queer person to write you literally any other jokes.”
Jimmy Kimmel
✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Ryan Houlihan
✔@RyanHoulihan
Stop making shitty fucking gay jokes. Hire me to write you better gay jokes. Hire any queer person to write you literally any other jokes.
4:51 PM - Apr 6, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The beef between the two men began on Wednesday when Hannity called Kimmel a “despicable disgrace” over jokes he made about Melania Trump’s accent and grasp of the English language.
Kimmel, who has built a reputation as one of comedy’s most vocal anti-Trump voices, responded during his opening monologue on Thursday evening with a bizarre sex rant about whether Hannity could get an “erection”
“Sean Hannity’s problem is that for eight years, while Obama was President, he was unable to get an erection,” Kimmel said. “For eight years, not one erection. And he tried everything … he tried looking at pictures of Paul Ryan with his shirt off. Didn’t work.”
“[Hannity] went to office Christmas parties with Bill O’Reilly,” he continued. “Nothing worked. But now that Trump is president, here’s the twist, Sean Hannity is unable to have anything but an erection. He’s had an erection since November of 2016. And it’s driving him mad. He’s lost his mind.”
[h=1]Jimmy Kimmel Under Fire for Hurling ‘Homophobic Slurs’ at Hannity and Trump[/h]
35888
by BEN KEW7 Apr 201826,323
[h=2]Late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel is facing criticism after repeatedly making lewd jokes suggesting a homosexual relationship between Fox News host Sean Hannity and President Donald Trump.[/h]During a heated Twitter exchange between Kimmel and Hannity, the ABC funnyman repeatedly suggested that President Trump and Hannity were having a sexual relationship.
“When your clown makeup rubs off on Trump’s ass, does it make his butt look like a Creamsicle,” Kimmel quipped in response to a Hannity tweet claiming Kimmel had sexually harassed young women.
Jimmy Kimmel✔@jimmykimmel
When your clown makeup rubs off on Trump’s ass, does it make his butt look like a Creamsicle? https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982326756240756736 …
2:03 PM - Apr 6, 2018
“Don’t worry – just keep tweeting – you’ll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO,” Kimmel later responded after Hannity called him a “pervert” and “Harvey Weinstein Jr.”
advertisement
Jimmy Kimmel✔@jimmykimmel
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
4:26 PM - Apr 6, 2018
However, Kimmel’s vile jokes sparked a backlash from several social media users, who accused him of alienating his LGBT audience and trivializing their lifestyle choices.
“YOU THINK YOURE JUST FEUDING HANNITY, CONGRATS PAL YOU JUST ALIENATED YOUR LGBT VIEWERS,” one user named Scott Linnen wrote, adding that Kimmel’s behavior had made him “physically ill.”
Jimmy Kimmel✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Scott Linnen@ScottLinnenYOU THINK YOURE JUST FEUDING HANNITY, CONGRATS PAL YOU JUST ALIENATED YOUR LGBT VIEWERS @jimmykimmel
6:39 PM - Apr 6, 2018
Jimmy Kimmel✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Scott Linnen@ScottLinnenI’m physically ill over you making gay a punchline in 2018. With all the hatred out there, this is how you get laughs & RTs @jimmykimmel
6:37 PM - Apr 6, 2018
“So, it’s OK for you to make homophobic slurs? What an asshole,” added one individual.
Jimmy Kimmel✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Zarba@ZarbaNotZorbaSo, it's OK for you to make homophobic slurs? What an asshole.
6:44 PM - Apr 6, 2018
Another person accused Kimmel of liberal hypocrisy.
Jimmy Kimmel✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Old Submariner
@BerrinAndroHaha..is this the part where liberals are OK with sexual orientation jokes as long as it's about conservatives? Funny stuff.
4:36 PM - Apr 6, 2018
“Stop making shitty fucking gay jokes,” added Ryan Houlihan. “Hire me to write you better gay jokes. Hire any queer person to write you literally any other jokes.”
Jimmy Kimmel✔@jimmykimmel
6 Apr
Don't worry - just keep tweeting - you'll get back on top! (or does Trump prefer you on bottom?) Either way, keep your chin up big fella..XO https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/982368324679094272 …
Ryan Houlihan✔@RyanHoulihan
Stop making shitty fucking gay jokes. Hire me to write you better gay jokes. Hire any queer person to write you literally any other jokes.
4:51 PM - Apr 6, 2018
The beef between the two men began on Wednesday when Hannity called Kimmel a “despicable disgrace” over jokes he made about Melania Trump’s accent and grasp of the English language.
Kimmel, who has built a reputation as one of comedy’s most vocal anti-Trump voices, responded during his opening monologue on Thursday evening with a bizarre sex rant about whether Hannity could get an “erection”
“Sean Hannity’s problem is that for eight years, while Obama was President, he was unable to get an erection,” Kimmel said. “For eight years, not one erection. And he tried everything … he tried looking at pictures of Paul Ryan with his shirt off. Didn’t work.”
“[Hannity] went to office Christmas parties with Bill O’Reilly,” he continued. “Nothing worked. But now that Trump is president, here’s the twist, Sean Hannity is unable to have anything but an erection. He’s had an erection since November of 2016. And it’s driving him mad. He’s lost his mind.”
[ Dinesh served time for his campaign finance offense. Rosie's is 5 times worse, and the left won't even print the story. Fucking hypocrite scums ]
Will Rosie O’Donnell Serve Time Like Dinesh D’Souza?
Rachel Alexander
|
Posted: May 07, 2018 12:01 AM
Share (264) Tweet
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
Left-wing activist and comedian Rosie O’Donnell has been caughtcontributing more than the legal limit to five Democratic political candidates. She used four variations of her name and five different New York addresses to make the contributions. This may show intent to disguise them.
Federal Election Commission rules limit contributions to federal candidates to $2,700 per election. Donors can max that out in a primary race, then max it out again during a general election for the same candidate. O’Donnell contributed more than $2,700 each to five candidates during the primary race.
The offense is punishable by large fines from the FEC. The FEC can also choose to let a donor move an excess donation from a primary race into the general election or refund it. It doesn’t have to impose the full amount of the fines, and it certainly does not have to criminally prosecute the individual.
O’Donnell’s contributions are similar to what conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza did during the 2012 election cycle. He asked two friends and their spouses to contribute $10,000 each to a congressional campaign, then he reimbursed them. Prosecutors chose to bring charges against him, and he ended up pleading guilty to the felony of making illegal contributions in the names of others. He was sentenced to eight months in a halfway house, five years probation and a $30,000 fine.
CARTOONS | KEN CATALINO
VIEW CARTOON
But prosecutors didn’t need to bring charges against him. Especially not felony charges. Left-leaning Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz said at the time, “I can’t help but think that [Mr. D’Souza’s] politics have something to do with it… . It smacks of selective prosecution.” Dershowitz told Newsmax, "This is clearly a case of selective prosecution for one of the most common things done during elections, which is to get people to raise money for you. If they went after everyone who did this, there would be no room in jails for murderers."
Former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova observed that the prosecution was unusual considering it involved a single donation made by an individual with no criminal record. David Mason, a former commissioner of the Federal Election Commission, told Newsmax that the prosecution had to show beyond a reasonable doubt that D’Souza broke the law “knowingly and willfully.” Campaign finance law is complex, and the average person who is not an attorney or working on campaigns might not have known this was against the law. D’Souza said he was unaware it was a campaign violation. I am a former county elections attorney, who worked on several campaigns, and I wasn’t even aware it was against the law until D’Souza’s prosecution.
Four Republican senators wrote to then-FBI Director James Comey and accused the Obama administration of using the DOJ to take down a prominent critic.
The Washington Times notes that in contrast, Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign failed to disclose millions of dollars in contributions and missed deadlines for refunding millions in excess contributions. Yet it was merely fined $375,000 and no one was prosecuted for felonies.
O’Donnell claims she did not know she had exceeded campaign finance limits. Then why did she use four different versions of her name and five different residential addresses?
The FEC penalties for contributing over the allowed limit and contributing in another’s name are quite similar — they are both fines. If D’Souza’s situation was escalated to criminal prosecution, then how is O’Donnell’s situation any different, if not worse? D’Souza tweeted about O’Donnell, “Five times more egregious than my case. Now let’s see if Lady Justice is truly blind.”
O’Donnell will likely get away with the five improper contributions. Unlike O’Donnell, the legal system was stacked against D’Souza. D’Souza was prosecuted by U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, a former staff member to Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and an Obama appointee. U.S. District Court Judge Richard Berman, a Clinton appointee, sentenced D’Souza. Fortunately, Trump has replaced many of the Obama-era U.S. Attorneys. He fired Bharara. But Berman is still on the bench.
The left dominates the legal system and has wrongly used it against many prominent conservatives. If O’Donnell is not prosecuted, it will scream injustice regarding what happened to D’Souza.
Will Rosie O’Donnell Serve Time Like Dinesh D’Souza?
Rachel Alexander
|
Posted: May 07, 2018 12:01 AM
Share (264) Tweet
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
Left-wing activist and comedian Rosie O’Donnell has been caughtcontributing more than the legal limit to five Democratic political candidates. She used four variations of her name and five different New York addresses to make the contributions. This may show intent to disguise them.
Federal Election Commission rules limit contributions to federal candidates to $2,700 per election. Donors can max that out in a primary race, then max it out again during a general election for the same candidate. O’Donnell contributed more than $2,700 each to five candidates during the primary race.
The offense is punishable by large fines from the FEC. The FEC can also choose to let a donor move an excess donation from a primary race into the general election or refund it. It doesn’t have to impose the full amount of the fines, and it certainly does not have to criminally prosecute the individual.
O’Donnell’s contributions are similar to what conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza did during the 2012 election cycle. He asked two friends and their spouses to contribute $10,000 each to a congressional campaign, then he reimbursed them. Prosecutors chose to bring charges against him, and he ended up pleading guilty to the felony of making illegal contributions in the names of others. He was sentenced to eight months in a halfway house, five years probation and a $30,000 fine.
CARTOONS | KEN CATALINO
VIEW CARTOON
But prosecutors didn’t need to bring charges against him. Especially not felony charges. Left-leaning Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz said at the time, “I can’t help but think that [Mr. D’Souza’s] politics have something to do with it… . It smacks of selective prosecution.” Dershowitz told Newsmax, "This is clearly a case of selective prosecution for one of the most common things done during elections, which is to get people to raise money for you. If they went after everyone who did this, there would be no room in jails for murderers."
Former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova observed that the prosecution was unusual considering it involved a single donation made by an individual with no criminal record. David Mason, a former commissioner of the Federal Election Commission, told Newsmax that the prosecution had to show beyond a reasonable doubt that D’Souza broke the law “knowingly and willfully.” Campaign finance law is complex, and the average person who is not an attorney or working on campaigns might not have known this was against the law. D’Souza said he was unaware it was a campaign violation. I am a former county elections attorney, who worked on several campaigns, and I wasn’t even aware it was against the law until D’Souza’s prosecution.
The Washington Times notes that in contrast, Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign failed to disclose millions of dollars in contributions and missed deadlines for refunding millions in excess contributions. Yet it was merely fined $375,000 and no one was prosecuted for felonies.
O’Donnell claims she did not know she had exceeded campaign finance limits. Then why did she use four different versions of her name and five different residential addresses?
The FEC penalties for contributing over the allowed limit and contributing in another’s name are quite similar — they are both fines. If D’Souza’s situation was escalated to criminal prosecution, then how is O’Donnell’s situation any different, if not worse? D’Souza tweeted about O’Donnell, “Five times more egregious than my case. Now let’s see if Lady Justice is truly blind.”
O’Donnell will likely get away with the five improper contributions. Unlike O’Donnell, the legal system was stacked against D’Souza. D’Souza was prosecuted by U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, a former staff member to Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and an Obama appointee. U.S. District Court Judge Richard Berman, a Clinton appointee, sentenced D’Souza. Fortunately, Trump has replaced many of the Obama-era U.S. Attorneys. He fired Bharara. But Berman is still on the bench.
The left dominates the legal system and has wrongly used it against many prominent conservatives. If O’Donnell is not prosecuted, it will scream injustice regarding what happened to D’Souza.
Wow, Rosie is guilty of fraud. When you create a network to hide your intent to conduct criminal behavior, that's fraud, and you're leaving an audit trail to use against you. She's just too stupid to know that
If you want to take an aggressive position, if have to leave yourself with a plausible deniability defense. Doing what she did shows criminal intent.
For example, if you want to make such donations, do so through friends and family making sure no one person exceeds the limits. Then if you're questioned about it you can say "I gave the money to my friends to make legal donations in their names, I didn't know that was illegal". At least they can't throw fraud at you, fraud is a serious offense.
If you want to take an aggressive position, if have to leave yourself with a plausible deniability defense. Doing what she did shows criminal intent.
For example, if you want to make such donations, do so through friends and family making sure no one person exceeds the limits. Then if you're questioned about it you can say "I gave the money to my friends to make legal donations in their names, I didn't know that was illegal". At least they can't throw fraud at you, fraud is a serious offense.
She is a shit stain.........wait, she’s white, am I allowed to say that?[ Dinesh served time for his campaign finance offense. Rosie's is 5 times worse, and the left won't even print the story. Fucking hypocrite scums ]
Will Rosie O’Donnell Serve Time Like Dinesh D’Souza?
Rachel Alexander
|
Posted: May 07, 2018 12:01 AM
Share (264) Tweet
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
Left-wing activist and comedian Rosie O’Donnell has been caughtcontributing more than the legal limit to five Democratic political candidates. She used four variations of her name and five different New York addresses to make the contributions. This may show intent to disguise them.
Federal Election Commission rules limit contributions to federal candidates to $2,700 per election. Donors can max that out in a primary race, then max it out again during a general election for the same candidate. O’Donnell contributed more than $2,700 each to five candidates during the primary race.
The offense is punishable by large fines from the FEC. The FEC can also choose to let a donor move an excess donation from a primary race into the general election or refund it. It doesn’t have to impose the full amount of the fines, and it certainly does not have to criminally prosecute the individual.
O’Donnell’s contributions are similar to what conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza did during the 2012 election cycle. He asked two friends and their spouses to contribute $10,000 each to a congressional campaign, then he reimbursed them. Prosecutors chose to bring charges against him, and he ended up pleading guilty to the felony of making illegal contributions in the names of others. He was sentenced to eight months in a halfway house, five years probation and a $30,000 fine.
CARTOONS | KEN CATALINO
VIEW CARTOON
But prosecutors didn’t need to bring charges against him. Especially not felony charges. Left-leaning Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz said at the time, “I can’t help but think that [Mr. D’Souza’s] politics have something to do with it… . It smacks of selective prosecution.” Dershowitz told Newsmax, "This is clearly a case of selective prosecution for one of the most common things done during elections, which is to get people to raise money for you. If they went after everyone who did this, there would be no room in jails for murderers."
Former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova observed that the prosecution was unusual considering it involved a single donation made by an individual with no criminal record. David Mason, a former commissioner of the Federal Election Commission, told Newsmax that the prosecution had to show beyond a reasonable doubt that D’Souza broke the law “knowingly and willfully.” Campaign finance law is complex, and the average person who is not an attorney or working on campaigns might not have known this was against the law. D’Souza said he was unaware it was a campaign violation. I am a former county elections attorney, who worked on several campaigns, and I wasn’t even aware it was against the law until D’Souza’s prosecution.
Four Republican senators wrote to then-FBI Director James Comey and accused the Obama administration of using the DOJ to take down a prominent critic.
The Washington Times notes that in contrast, Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign failed to disclose millions of dollars in contributions and missed deadlines for refunding millions in excess contributions. Yet it was merely fined $375,000 and no one was prosecuted for felonies.
O’Donnell claims she did not know she had exceeded campaign finance limits. Then why did she use four different versions of her name and five different residential addresses?
The FEC penalties for contributing over the allowed limit and contributing in another’s name are quite similar — they are both fines. If D’Souza’s situation was escalated to criminal prosecution, then how is O’Donnell’s situation any different, if not worse? D’Souza tweeted about O’Donnell, “Five times more egregious than my case. Now let’s see if Lady Justice is truly blind.”
O’Donnell will likely get away with the five improper contributions. Unlike O’Donnell, the legal system was stacked against D’Souza. D’Souza was prosecuted by U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, a former staff member to Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and an Obama appointee. U.S. District Court Judge Richard Berman, a Clinton appointee, sentenced D’Souza. Fortunately, Trump has replaced many of the Obama-era U.S. Attorneys. He fired Bharara. But Berman is still on the bench.
The left dominates the legal system and has wrongly used it against many prominent conservatives. If O’Donnell is not prosecuted, it will scream injustice regarding what happened to D’Souza.
