why wouldn't i point out the missed corner?...it directly lead downfield to the only goal of the match?
The goal was a full minute or so later. If you make a connection between these events then you also have to consider that by that time Holland should have been one or two players short which would probably have decided the game even earlier.
i realize you are german and can't stand the clogs but the spanish 'diving team' was just as big a disgrace as the dutch barbarian tactics....and how can you say a goal or both by robben would have been undeserved?...why would they be undeserved?...i get it, u hate the dutch...but to say the goals would have not been warranted just seems like sour grapes cuz yer team was playing in the consolation game...
What is your problem, man? Can't you imagine someone having an objective opinion just because he favours one side?
If you really think Holland deserved to win this game then evidently you have watched another match than I did. As I wrote before, Holland did almost nothing creative, they were relying purely on fortunate situations to somehow get a goal. Spain was obviously the better team for almost all of the 120 minutes.
Of course, football is not about deserving to win, in the end it's only about scoring one goal more than the other side. Had Kroos put Germany in front in the semis we might have won the game and it would not have mattered to me in the least that Spain was the better team. But I would at leats have been objective enough to admit that we didn't really deserve the win.