Huge Nba Play Under 208 Den/Utah

Search

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
24,627
Tokens
3 mins left over needed like 20 for a push, Denver up 11. game was over if denver had any clock management. but like i said, the nba is the nba. where u can win the first qtr by 15 and lose the 2nd by 20.
 

MY HEART IS A HOME AND FEAR DONT LIVE HERE
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
7,670
Tokens
yeah denver are a bunch of dumb fucks shooting and driving to the hole with 16 left on the clock
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
24,627
Tokens
stacks- i predicted the bad shooting and high turnover game, jr smith goes off from 3 and pts galore in last 3 mins, its a bad beat, but those happen
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
I had the over for the 2nd Half. I didn't see the game until 2:57 left and both teams had scored 17 each in the 4th and 11 point game at that point.

I am not a big conspiracy theory guy, but for me to win a game that had no business going over is unreal. 29 points in the final 3 minutes and Denver not killing as much clock as possible.

The other thing that struck me as odd, is that last night Houston played defense straight up until about :30 down 6, but all of a sudden Utah starts fouling down 8.

Someone please explain to me how they score 34 points in 9:03, but score 29 points in 2:23, Denver killed final :34 with a offensive rebound and running the clock out.

Seriously 29 points in 2:23?

I won, but man I don't know what to think about future games.
 

MY HEART IS A HOME AND FEAR DONT LIVE HERE
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
7,670
Tokens
I had the over for the 2nd Half. I didn't see the game until 2:57 left and both teams had scored 17 each in the 4th and 11 point game at that point.

I am not a big conspiracy theory guy, but for me to win a game that had no business going over is unreal. 29 points in the final 3 minutes and Denver not killing as much clock as possible.

The other thing that struck me as odd, is that last night Houston played defense straight up until about :30 down 6, but all of a sudden Utah starts fouling down 8.

Someone please explain to me how they score 34 points in 9:03, but score 29 points in 2:23, Denver killed final :34 with a offensive rebound and running the clock out.

Seriously 29 points in 2:23?

I won, but man I don't know what to think about future games.




unreal
 

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
175
Tokens
alot of missed ft's and utah, well both teams missed alot of layups and points in the paint.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 23, 2004
Messages
599
Tokens
This game had fix written all over it!! Did you notice everytime D Will or anyone else took it to the rim in the last 3 mins that they called every little ticky tack foul that they could?? So Utah shoots 36% and Denver 46% but yet the game goes over because of 86 FT attempts?!?!!? :):) Wow....This is almost as bad as the Sac/LA playoff game that Donaghy did. Don't tell me JR Smith had anything to do with this over either because he only had his run in the 1st Half and this game was well on its way to being under after that. Only in the NBA...^<<^
 

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
175
Tokens
yup fix in the first half too under 100 wont you think these two teams can score over 100 easy they both dont play much def.
 

A Separate Reality
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
5,533
Tokens
I had the OVER and was thinking conspiracy 2 thirds of the way
into the 4th qtr. Utah had taken about 100 shots and had 20 offensive rebounds, how the fuck can they not have at least 150 points by themselves. This fucking thing is fixed! Somebody paid off the Jazz to miss tip ins left and right. When was the last time you saw so many freaking tip ins missed ???Jesus!!!


Then a freethrowathon broke out, the OVER bettors greatest friend and an UNDER bettors curse. The game goes easily goes OVER. I'm left with a winning ticket and a smile, the losers are left with a frown and a conspiracy theory.

Losing tickets and conspiracy theories go together like winning tickets and smiles. There is a definite cause and effect going on there.@)

If this game would have been UNDER I would have had overwhelming evidence of a conspiracy being perpetrated against the OVER, plenty of evidence.

As it stands, what conspiracy? This was an easy OVER, anyone with half a brain could see that, I'm a freaking genius.

:laugh:
 

do work son
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
4,797
Tokens
This game had no business going over.

This was the right side last night and there really isn't a doubt in my mind. That's the most ridiculous total I've lost all season.

Keep the head up and again, even though your account doesn't reflect it, you were on the right side here.
 

A Separate Reality
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
5,533
Tokens
This game had no business going over.

This was the right side last night and there really isn't a doubt in my mind. That's the most ridiculous total I've lost all season.

Keep the head up and again, even though your account doesn't reflect it, you were on the right side here.


For the sake of learning, I totally disagree. The right side was the OVER. 2 defenseless teams with better than average offenses screams OVER. It played out that way, Utah had 93 shots but hit on only 36% of them, they had 20 offensive boards, the pace was back and forth AND there were 86 free throws attempted between the 2 teams! Both teams attempt more freethrows per game than average. Freethrows mean free shots at the basket with no clock moving, that is the main reason these 2 have played more OVER games than UNDERS. If the line would have been 215, like I thought it should be I would have passed on this game. At 218 and I would have looked the UNDER, but at 208/209 it was a natural OVER bet. I can't see a logical argument for the UNDER, but hey that's what gambling is all about; opinions.

Respectfully, Occam (<)<
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
Unders got screwed. Reminds of the Mem/GS game the other night.
 

do work son
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
4,797
Tokens
For the sake of learning, I totally disagree. The right side was the OVER. 2 defenseless teams with better than average offenses screams OVER. It played out that way, Utah had 93 shots but hit on only 36% of them, they had 20 offensive boards, the pace was back and forth AND there were 86 free throws attempted between the 2 teams! Both teams attempt more freethrows per game than average. Freethrows mean free shots at the basket with no clock moving, that is the main reason these 2 have played more OVER games than UNDERS. If the line would have been 215, like I thought it should be I would have passed on this game. At 218 and I would have looked the UNDER, but at 208/209 it was a natural OVER bet. I can't see a logical argument for the UNDER, but hey that's what gambling is all about; opinions.

Respectfully, Occam (<)<

The Nuggets are actually a severely underrated defensive team this season and while I respectfully disagree with your thoughts, no over bettors from last night should be proud of their win.

Once again, this game had no business going over and the under was the right side without a doubt in my mind.
 

RX Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
135
Tokens
Anyone putting their hard earned money on GS, PHX, DEN, or LAC unders especially at home are insane. There is no "right side" when teams don't play defense. You spend 2 hours praying a 2 minute lull during 48 minutes of run and gun.

Play the overs and lean on 55%+ hit rate if you play them at all.
 

RX Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
135
Tokens
The Nuggets are actually a severely underrated defensive team this season and while I respectfully disagree with your thoughts, no over bettors from last night should be proud of their win.

Once again, this game had no business going over and the under was the right side without a doubt in my mind.

Based on what? Obviously not data. The line was clearly set by DEN home PA vs. PF numbers (207) with a line move as bettors pounded the over which hits at 55.3%.

DEN is fighting to hold onto their seed and get home court in the first round or two. They were going to come out firing.

The over was a safer bet based on the factors.
 

RX Expert
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
2,891
Tokens
isnt everyone over this game yet?? the over was the correct play in this game... the game is over move on....

get it back today for all those who took the under
 

RX Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
135
Tokens
Good point..

Tonight: LAL are on 6 straight unders. Thoughts on HOU / LAL o196?
 

A Separate Reality
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
5,533
Tokens
Good point..

Tonight: LAL are on 6 straight unders. Thoughts on HOU / LAL o196?

Both are middle of the pack when it comes to OV/UN.

193, 205 and 198 are the scores when they've played each other this eason. Lakers don't have a top Defense. Offense is top 10.

Houston exactly the opposite, top D, no top offense. Everything cancels out.

You don't have 2 defenseless teams which usually indicates an OVER and you dont have 2 top defenses that usually point to the UNDER. The number, 196 is right. No value. A big gamble no matter which way you go. Flip a coin, there's better bets out there. GL
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,811
Messages
13,573,542
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com