I agree that UCLA has a great coaching staff and should do very well in the years to come. However, today, the team stinks. They ran the ball pretty well against Fresno, fairly well against AZ and ok against WA. The rest of their games the run was completely shut down by some pretty pedestrian PAC-10 defenses. USC is on a whole different level. As far as players knowing one another from high school, ask TX A&M, FL St, Miss St how well that motivation helped them--all are bad teams that were blown out by their local adversary. I am sure Carroll remembers the advertisement that Rick took out in the local newspaper at the beginning of the year, and will be looking to lay a beatdown to remind him of how big a hill UCLA has to climb.
I will agree that the under might be a good play as I don't see UCLA scoring more than 7.
OK if you think that A&M, FL St. and MS St. getting blown out has anything to do with this game and there's going to be a 50 point blowout and under 47.5 sounds good. Then there's nothing more I can tell you.
But just to be kind, I think your take on the under holds some weight. I just hammered it myself. It makes no sense to expect Craft to do the same thing week in and week out, especially in this game. Maybe he'll throw a pick or two, maybe even 3. But pick 6's? It would take at least 3 of them to put this game into over territory. Even then USC may not press the score and change their game plan to staying on the ground (except in 3rd and long situations) and just getting it over with.