What you just stated is the reason people have disdain for you. You can differentiate your own statements. You stated that is his attorneys would tell him to sell, now you are saying it doesn't really matter. What you a politician, you are talking out of both sides of your mouth. Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.
that was pretty funny
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/...rly-bids-shelly-sterling-los-angeles-clippers
latest on it
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/...rly-bids-shelly-sterling-los-angeles-clippers
latest on it
I've said nothing would surprise me but I do think the resolution is gonna be pretty anti-climatic like I've said all along.
You got BofA doing the M&A work on this, you got guys like Ballmer and Ellison making bids. They wouldn't be wasting their time if they thought this was a joke and going to be delayed.
You got BofA doing the M&A work on this, you got guys like Ballmer and Ellison making bids. They wouldn't be wasting their time if they thought this was a joke and going to be delayed.
So you got banned here because of "other posters" and then didn't get along with posters at another site either? Big surprise there. I'm sure this pattern is evident in your real life too. It's never you. It's always everyone else with the problem. Just ignore the only common denominator.
Yeah but you gotta putup the bid, then if it gets to the sale stage I think I read there is like a 300 million deposit.
If those guys didn't think this situation was rapidly approaching its conclusion I doubt they would be submitting bids to Shelley. Would just wait for league to sell the team/legal process to play out. They are amongst the richest people in the world, seems like they wouldn't just be blindly bidding hoping there is no dog and pony show.
Like BofA getting involved to prep the financials, seems like that would be so beneath them to do with the prospect of Sterling tying up the process.
I haven't been wrong about anything.
The only one wrong thus far about anything is you and your proclamation that his attorney would advise him to sell. Read every recent article QUOTING Belcher and he is saying the exact opposite. You've already been called out on this and your response was that it didn't matter what he was saying. What? Ha. He is quoted article after article saying the exact opposite of what you claimed.
That would never happen today though.
Hell I really don't know how the hell it happened in 1996. I don't even think anything close to that happens in the other 3 major leagues.
NHL spent like $800 to vet him, lol. A lot of people don't know this but they got fooled again like 5-6 years later by the guy who bought the Sabres.
Lol, he is selling. Why would his attorney ever say to the public that his client is guilty and his best option is to sell? I said that in terms of them meeting in private and coming to the conclusion to sell. The fact you guys think what attorneys say to the public is what they say to their client is hilarious. Haven't been wrong about anything.
Blecher said he spoke to Sterling three times Wednesday to discuss his position. Asked whether Donald Sterling might relent and sell the team if Shelly Sterling is indeed able to secure a bid before Tuesday's hearing, Blecher said, "I don't know."
"I would suggest he take her to dinner and see what happens," he said. "If I were to judge by his attitude in our three conversations today, I'd say no. But you don't know what a woman can do.
lol great quote by his lawyer
"I would suggest he take her to dinner and see what happens," he said. "If I were to judge by his attitude in our three conversations today, I'd say no. But you don't know what a woman can do.
lol great quote by his lawyer
