Connecticut(sp?)legislature restricts casino
competition in order to subsidise two fake
indian tribes.Although they do this for their
own reasons.Why wouldn't legislators in other
states not follow suit to protect and subsidise
horse owners,breeders etc??a group that has
more political clout(at least before casinos
in connecticut)in comparison to the fake indians??
In kentucky,they will do everything possible
to save their racetracks.even turfway.
competition in order to subsidise two fake
indian tribes.Although they do this for their
own reasons.Why wouldn't legislators in other
states not follow suit to protect and subsidise
horse owners,breeders etc??a group that has
more political clout(at least before casinos
in connecticut)in comparison to the fake indians??
In kentucky,they will do everything possible
to save their racetracks.even turfway.