hno:. He won't be able to declare Bankruptcy if he's POTUS.
Whose the Nut Job NOW? TRUMP RIGHT AGAIN!!!
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.14902)]
[/COLOR]
Ford Shifting Future Auto Production To Mexico As Obama Signs Pacific Trade Deal - Breitbart
Ford Shifting Future Auto Production To Mexico As Obama Signs Pacific Trade Deal
BREITBART.COM
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.14902)]
[/COLOR]Ford Shifting Future Auto Production To Mexico As Obama Signs Pacific Trade Deal - Breitbart
Ford Shifting Future Auto Production To Mexico As Obama Signs Pacific Trade Deal
BREITBART.COM
Originally Posted by The Guesser View Post
"Trump rallies are very similar to films I've seen of Hitler rallies in Germany, and Trump himself is using the Hitler model of Personal charisma without substance, Religious hate and fear of "the others". I'm sorry, but his rise in popularity has many parallels to Hitler's. Hopefully it's nipped in "
A Bloomberg presidential run would only boost Donald Trump
Bloomberg offers the prospect of a moderate third party candidacy self-financed by his estimated $39 billion fortune.
In some ways, Bloomberg is reminiscent of Trump: outspoken, uninterested in small talk, honest. And like Trump, he’s been a Democrat, Republican and independent. He was an effective mayor who combined a zero-tolerance approach to crime with a crackdown on supersized drinks, overseeing the city’s spiritual and economic recovery after the 9/11 attacks.
In theory, he would enjoy a national constituency of those appalled by the extremism within both parties. Republicans who favour legalised abortion and gun control would like him. He is a social liberal’s woozy daydream. When asked if he’d ever smoked pot, he replied: “You bet I did. And I enjoyed it.”
But he also offers something to Democrats worried that their party has gone too far towards anti-capitalist populism. A Bloomberg candidacy would be pro-business, and his conflicts with New York’s teaching unions show that he's serious about public sector reform.
However, Bloomberg’s lack of political definition could just as easily see him fall through the cracks: too liberal for some, too conservative for others. His appeal is big city, bi-coastal: New York and Los Angeles. He has nothing in common with the folks that live in-between, in what the rich call “flyover country”.
Bloomberg offers the prospect of a moderate third party candidacy self-financed by his estimated $39 billion fortune.
In some ways, Bloomberg is reminiscent of Trump: outspoken, uninterested in small talk, honest. And like Trump, he’s been a Democrat, Republican and independent. He was an effective mayor who combined a zero-tolerance approach to crime with a crackdown on supersized drinks, overseeing the city’s spiritual and economic recovery after the 9/11 attacks.
In theory, he would enjoy a national constituency of those appalled by the extremism within both parties. Republicans who favour legalised abortion and gun control would like him. He is a social liberal’s woozy daydream. When asked if he’d ever smoked pot, he replied: “You bet I did. And I enjoyed it.”
But he also offers something to Democrats worried that their party has gone too far towards anti-capitalist populism. A Bloomberg candidacy would be pro-business, and his conflicts with New York’s teaching unions show that he's serious about public sector reform.
However, Bloomberg’s lack of political definition could just as easily see him fall through the cracks: too liberal for some, too conservative for others. His appeal is big city, bi-coastal: New York and Los Angeles. He has nothing in common with the folks that live in-between, in what the rich call “flyover country”.
One poll showed that in a hypothetical national race, he’d get just 8 per cent as an independent. His problem is that the American two-party system is simply too resilient. The legal struggle even to get on the ballot would be huge and the last time a non-Democrat or non-Republican won the presidency was 1848.
In 1992, Reform Party businessman Ross Perot scored 19 per cent – and is now largely forgotten. Bloomberg stands only to lose, to transform his historical reputation from a “could have been” to a “tried to and failed horribly”.
But the most significant point for Bloomberg is that any presidential run by him would actually hurt centrism. Assuming that Donald Trump is the Republican nominee and Hillary Clinton fights for the Democrats, Bloomberg would steal enough moderate Democratic votes to hand the election over to Trump. Trump could even win New York in a contest between three these locals.
If Bloomberg is so troubled by the rise of Sanders and Trump then he’d be more use to US politics if he supported their rivals. Centrist alternatives do exist. Hillary Clinton may be tired but it’s hard to see how her agenda would be vastly different to Bloomberg’s were she her party’s nominee. And the Republican moderates now have a rising champion in Ohio governor John Kasich, who was placed second in New Hampshire.
Asked about the prospect of Bloomberg throwing his hat into the ring, Trump said – as one billionaire to another – that he’d welcome it. Given the boost it would give his presidential chances, he’d be right to. That alone should give Bloomberg pause for thought.
A song for Guesser
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nauLgZISozs
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nauLgZISozs
Wednesday on his radio show, conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh argued that New Hampshire Republican primary winner Donald Trump won by building a coalition of voters that went beyond just conservatives, which is something the GOP has claimed was necessary to win elections in this era of American politics.
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016...ms-to-want-now-they-are-badgering-bashing-it/
“Donald Trump has the exact coalition the Republican Party, to a man, has told me they need to win, that they need to thrive,” Limbaugh said. “And now they’re reduced to bashing it by virtue of bashing Trump. And now they’re reduced to bashing it by virtue of bashing Cruz. The two people who are showing the Republican Party all they had to do all these past seven years, but they didn’t. They purposely, strategically, tactically refused to push back, refused to make a spectacle of stopping Obama, and they have themselves to blame for this predicament.”
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016...ms-to-want-now-they-are-badgering-bashing-it/
“Donald Trump has the exact coalition the Republican Party, to a man, has told me they need to win, that they need to thrive,” Limbaugh said. “And now they’re reduced to bashing it by virtue of bashing Trump. And now they’re reduced to bashing it by virtue of bashing Cruz. The two people who are showing the Republican Party all they had to do all these past seven years, but they didn’t. They purposely, strategically, tactically refused to push back, refused to make a spectacle of stopping Obama, and they have themselves to blame for this predicament.”
