Hilarious TRUMP Lovers

[PatsFan1283]

Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake says his party's presumptive nominee cannot win the general election. "Let's face it: meet the old Trump, just like the new Trump," Flake said to reporters on Capitol Hill in the Senate hallway. "We've got what we've got. That's not somebody who can win the White House."

Props to this guy for quoting The Wire, whoever he is.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake says his party's presumptive nominee cannot win the general election. "Let's face it: meet the old Trump, just like the new Trump," Flake said to reporters on Capitol Hill in the Senate hallway. "We've got what we've got. That's not somebody who can win the White House."

Props to this guy for quoting The Wire, whoever he is.

He’s up for re-election. Enough said.

 

[PatsFan1283]

He’s up for re-election. Enough said.

Up for re-election means you have to support Trump in AZ though, no?

McCain tucked his tail between his legs despite the fact that he spent 6 years in Hanoi and Trump wasn't too impressed by it.

 

[neverbend]

Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake says his party's presumptive nominee cannot win the general election. "Let's face it: meet the old Trump, just like the new Trump," Flake said to reporters on Capitol Hill in the Senate hallway. "We've got what we've got. That's not somebody who can win the White House."

Props to this guy for quoting The Wire, whoever he is.

I'm almost sure the Flake was a member of the 'gang of eight' to pave the way for
amnesty for illegals, he probably was a #nevertrumper from the beginning just waiting
for an imagined appropriate time to diss Trump.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Up for re-election means you have to support Trump in AZ though, no?

McCain tucked his tail between his legs despite the fact that he spent 6 years in Hanoi and Trump wasn't too impressed by it.

I guess he thinks Trumps remarks will hurt his chances if he supports him. From what I’ve read he plays both ends against the middle.

 

[neverbend]

I say Drumpf proved he's a sick racist even to those that have to support him like Ryan, McConnell, etc. It was funny to see Mitch dance around the racist word on the Sunday Shows, while Admonishing Drumpf for his racism. Yes, the AMERICAN Judge, born in Indiana, has a Spanish Surname. So? You realize Alex Jones is more Full of Shit than Drumpf, right? Again, maybe not since you bet a +700 dog at even money.

Some day you will eventually tire of unfairly assigning to Trump the attributes of a racist.
As far as Trump being racist by his remarks Curiel is as pure white as Trump or Mrs. Clinton 100%
of European stock like anywhere between 10 to 20% of Mexicans, so stating this being a racist remark is feeble.
Racism is putting down someone of Black or Brown ancestry.

Trump's remarks only had America first tones not racist tones.
Furthermore, neither of his parents was an American citizen when he was born, ergo,
the Judge also has Mexican citizenship. The Judge was a 1953 anchor baby! More than likely
that's another reason he prejudges Trump!

 

[superbeets]

Some day you will eventually tire of unfairly assigning to Trump the attributes of a racist.
As far as Trump being racist by his remarks Curiel is as pure white as Trump or Mrs. Clinton 100%
of European stock like anywhere between 10 to 20% of Mexicans, so stating this being a racist remark is feeble.
Racism is putting down someone of Black or Brown ancestry.

Trump's remarks only had America first tones not racist tones.
Furthermore, neither of his parents was an American citizen when he was born, ergo,
the Judge also has Mexican citizenship. The Judge was a 1953 anchor baby! More than likely
that's another reason he prejudges Trump!

Guesser is the forum chump.

He uses baby language Drumpf for Trump.

Probably uses moo moo for cow and gee gee for horse.


He always displays his immaturity in these forums.

 

[neverbend]

Guesser is the forum chump.

He uses baby language Drumpf for Trump.

Probably uses moo moo for cow and gee gee for horse.


He always displays his immaturity in these forums.

I almost admire his ability to spew pure nonsense. I'm truly baffled that he believes what he's stating.

 

[Dafinch]

Almost a year ago, somebody in the GOP, I think it was that pumpkin headed druggie Limbaugh, said he thought that Frump was a plant from the Dems. I laughed and thought, "Paranoid much?" I STILL don't think it's true, but let's just say I ain't laughing now. Frump is like a gift from heaven with these blunders, obviously Dems by and large think his statement was outrageous, but the number of Repubs-including some withdrawing their support(and Buzz Feed withdrawing their cash) lining up to criticize him is, frankly, startling. Between getting embarrassed into contributing to the Vets after he got caught in a lie, getting bitch slapped by Hillary using his own words(which is why Mr. Counter Puncher's "best shots" were, "She's pathetic," and, "She doesn't LOOK very presidential, does she?" lol), and now getting forced from all sides into trying to walk back his comments, it has NOT been a stellar week for Herr Frump, to say the least-and once Bernie gives up and supports HC, her margin over him will increase even more. Gonna LUV sticking it to all the Right Wing Whack Jobs in this forum when that happens.

 

[neverbend]

Looks like a race for President between a Socialist, a Crook & an unusually effective amateur.
It's really an easier choice than we've had in a long time!​

 

[roadreeler57]

Nope, you're not getting out of it. I might offer an early out incentive, if the beginning of Football goes well, out the goodness of my heart.

I would never take an out....I was just seeing if youd bite on that +700 to me but knew you wouldnt was just kidding...We'll just leave the bet as it was @ even...I guess its still on because Hillary didnt get indicted & drop out yet..

 

[Dafinch]

Looks like a race for President between a Socialist, a Crook & an unusually effective amateur.
It's really an easier choice than we've had in a long time!​

It's easy, alright, but not in the way YOU think. Crook? Last time I checked HC didn't have anything approaching the following:

Trump University is currently the defendant in three lawsuits — two class-action lawsuits filed in California, and one filed in New York by then-attorney general Eric Schneiderman, who told CNN’s New Day in 2013: “We started looking at Trump University and discovered that it was a classic bait-and-switch scheme. It was a scam, starting with the fact that it was not a university.”

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/432010/trump-university-scam

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- JUNE 08, 2016 -[/h][h=1]HOW TRUMP’S ISRAEL ADVISER, JASON GREENBLATT, COULD PLAY A HISTORY-ALTERING ROLE[/h]Jewish News Service
It’s not really a question of “how” Jason Greenblatt, the real estate transactions lawyer and son of Hungarian-Jewish immigrants who grew up in New York City’s Queens borough, became a presidential candidate’s adviser on issues related to Israel. For him, it’s more a question of “what”—what will he do with the immense opportunity he has been given?
Greenblatt—a Teaneck, N.J., resident who in April was named as a primary Israel adviser to presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump—spoke to The Jewish Link and JNS.org in a jointly published interview about the honor he carries with him in his role each day.
“That phrase, of being a ‘light unto the nations,’ is in my mind every single day, it’s part of the responsibility I feel every morning when I get into the car and drive to work. I run that theme through my mind, to make sure I adhere to that principle,” he said.
In spite of the fact that many Washington, DC-based political action committees cloak big-donor fundraisers as “advocacy events,” the part that individuals have played in the realm of true Israel advocacy cannot be discounted. Profound, history-altering roles have contributed to Israel’s very establishment and continued vibrancy by Jewish ad hoc presidential advisers—most notably Eddie Jacobson, who parlayed U.S. president Harry Truman into meeting with future Israeli president Chaim Weizmann, at the point when only a provisional government had been formed in Israel, before it was recognized by any other nation. At this past year’s American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) policy conference, a six-minute presentation on Jacobson by Robert A. Cohen, AIPAC’s chairman of the board, might have gone unnoticed; after all, there were a number of presentations this year that took over the 24-hour news cycle. Between speeches from Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, John Kasich, Paul Ryan, and yes, even Donald Trump, it might have been reasonable to take a break during the video presentation on Jacobson. But was it actually the most prescient presentation of the policy conference?
Jacobson had been army buddies, business partners, and Kansas City compatriots with Truman for decades, when Weizmann came to Washington in an effort to gain America’s recognition of the Jewish state. It was Jacobson who hopped on a plane after a middle-of-the-night phone call, walked into the president’s office, and convinced Truman to agree to speak to Weizmann after America’s organized Jewish communal organizations had failed in their efforts. America’s subsequent recognition of Israel was a cornerstone of its founding.
“You never know who is going to be the next Eddie Jacobson.You never know who’s going to be the next Mr. Greenblatt,” said Dr. Ben Chouake, national president of NORPAC, a New Jersey-based pro-Israel lobbying and advocacy group that counts Greenblatt as a member.
“Sometimes you are in the right place at the right time and it makes all the difference in the world. Our job is to use the great resources and great forum that have been given to us,” he said.
While a key portion of NORPAC’s mission is to organize and use funding groups that work directly to interface with and contribute directly to congressional campaigns, what Chouake believes has the most influence is the training of people like Greenblatt and others who not only advocate for Israel in Congress, but are also knowledgeable enough about the issues to represent Israel in their workplace, in local politics, or in the community at large. As such, NORPAC brings hundreds of people to Washington annually to advocate for Israel on what Chouake called a “grassroots level.” Greenblatt attended a few of these types of events when he was in college, and he feels they are essential.
“You troop along, you meet the congressman. I think they are very effective if you meet the right people, if you or the people in the room with you are good advocates. I encouraged my kids to do it,” he said.
Greenblatt added that last summer, he took his children to an advocacy program in Israel run through StandWithUs, during one of literally dozens of trips Greenblatt has made to Israel since his first visit at age 16.
“I think it’s important to train them young, and I wasn’t trained young. They have to know that if they don’t advocate for Israel, where is it going to be? There’s just too much hate against Israel today,” he said.
Greenblatt conveyed his awareness that his influence may or may not have the power to alter the course of history. He jokingly placed himself on a type of second tier, noting that Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and daughter Ivanka Trump are the candidate’s primary Jewish voices for Israel. Yet the American presidency’s significance for Israel is so great, he said, that he has been told his role could be as important as Esther—the Jewish queen of Persia.
“We have made tremendous efforts to encourage our children to pursue leadership roles and to seize opportunities when offered,” said Greenblatt’s wife, psychiatrist Dr. Naomi Greenblatt. “This tremendous appointment offered to my husband puts everything we have tried to teach them into modeling for real life. My husband’s commitment to advocate and advise on behalf of the State of Israel in this role is inspiring, as is the achdut (unity) that we have witnessed from the community at large.”
Jason Greenblatt said his lack of formal policy expertise mirrors that of Trump, and that in some ways, it’s part of their plan for success in Washington.
“I don’t mind if you say I haven’t been a policy expert over my lifetime. That’s true. But that doesn’t mean I can’t do a great job or pull together a team, so we have the right group of people, the right minds, to give Donald all the advice he needs. He’s the guy who is going to take all this input, from experts and non-experts alike, and propose things that hopefully will work,” he said.
“That’s the beauty of how Donald thinks. Sure, we could hire a bunch of experts and I am not diminishing the role of experts. There are great experts and less-than-great experts. But, I mean, where are we today? Is Israel any better off? Is there peace? Is there a deal with Gaza, that helped us? Lots of experts have been involved, and, no disrespect to them, but we don’t yet have peace,” said Greenblatt, adding that he is “not saying I will do better than them (the Washington establishment,” but that “you get to the right result when you don’t only include experts.”
Greenblatt also shared his perspective as the Jewish adviser who was figuratively standing next to Trump the day after Trump addressed the AIPAC conference, when Lillian Pinkus, AIPAC’s president, condemned his speech in strong and even tearful terms. She was referring to one word Trump uttered—“yay”—after the GOP candidate noted that this was President Barack Obama’s last year in office. She doubly condemned the audience’s 30 seconds of applause that followed Trump’s statement. “We are disappointed that so many people applauded a sentiment that we neither agree with or condone,” Pinkus said.
While he doesn’t think Trump is likely to hold a grudge when there is a serious topic such as Israel on the table, Greenblatt felt that AIPAC made a serious error in judgment.
“It was wrong of AIPAC to do that. I would not have made that decision if I were them,” he said.
Greenblatt qualified his comments by noting that the Republican nomination was, in March, still very much up in the air.
“When they issued the apology, you remember, there were a lot of other candidates on the stage. And then, very quickly, he won. I am not sure they anticipated that. But it’s a question they should have asked themselves,” said Greenblatt.
Trump’s experience as a strong negotiator, according to Greenblatt, is a key to the candidate’s game plan on Israel and shouldn’t be discounted.
“What we do for a living is work out transactions,” said Greenblatt said, who has worked with Trump for two decades. “You need negotiating skills, you need to listen to the other side, you have to try to piece together everything to try to address as many issues as you can, with both sides satisfied that a fair and appropriate deal has been struck. Not everyone is happy all the time. I am not diminishing the concept of a peace deal or a U.S.-Israel relationship—they are complicated and there are lots of layers, but people like Donald, who are skilled negotiators, and people on his team who have worked on transactions large and small over the course of their careers, are well-suited to these things.”
“I am not going to say that someone who has policy experience isn’t good,” he added. “That would be silly. But similarly, they should not be saying that people like Donald, who have no Washington experience, aren’t good, because I think Donald would be phenomenal. He’s pragmatic, he thinks outside the box, he sees how Washington is broken, and this could apply to Israeli-Palestinian relationships.”
Greenblatt said that ultimately, he feels lucky to be able to play whatever role he is destined to play in politics.
“Whatever Hashem has destined for me, whether small or large, I feel very fortunate to be in this position,” he said. “I hope I do a good job. And I will seek out advice from lots of people as I have been doing over the past months. Really, they’ve been coming to me for the moment, but I will keep looking and seeking.”

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- JUNE 07, 2016 -[/h][h=1]DONALD J. TRUMP STATEMENT REGARDING TRUMP UNIVERSITY[/h]It is unfortunate that my comments have been misconstrued as a categorical attack against people of Mexican heritage. I am friends with and employ thousands of people of Mexican and Hispanic descent. The American justice system relies on fair and impartial judges. All judges should be held to that standard. I do not feel that one’s heritage makes them incapable of being impartial, but, based on the rulings that I have received in the Trump University civil case, I feel justified in questioning whether I am receiving a fair trial.

Over the past few weeks, I have watched as the media has reported one inaccuracy after another concerning the ongoing litigation involving Trump University. There are several important facts the public should know and that the media has failed to report.

Throughout the litigation my attorneys have continually demonstrated that students who participated in Trump University were provided a substantive, valuable education based upon a curriculum developed by professors from Northwestern University, Columbia Business School, Stanford University and other respected institutions. And, the response from students was overwhelming. Over a five year period, more than 10,000 paying students filled out surveys giving the courses high marks and expressing their overwhelming satisfaction with Trump University’s programs. For example:

• Former student Tarla Makaeff, the original plaintiff in the litigation, not only completed multiple surveys rating Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in every category, but also praised Trump University’s mentorship program in a glowing 5 plus minute video testimonial. When asked “how could Trump University help to meet [her] goals”, she simply stated “[c]ontinue to offer great classes.” Once the plaintiffs’ lawyers realized how disastrous a witness she was, they asked to have her removed from the case. Over my lawyers’ objections, the judge granted the plaintiffs’ motion, but allowed the case to continue.

• Art Cohen, a lead plaintiffs in the litigation, completed a survey in which he not only rated Trump University’s three-day seminar “excellent” in virtually every category, but went so far as to indicate that he would “attend another Trump University seminar” and even “recommend Trump University seminars to a friend.” When asked how Trump University could improve the seminar, Mr. Cohen’s only suggestion was to “[h]ave lunch sandwiches brought in” and make the lunch break 45 minutes.
• Former student Bob Giullo, who has been critical of Trump University in numerous interviews and negative advertisements from my political opponents, also expressed his satisfaction, rating Trump University’s programs “excellent” in every category. When asked how Trump University could improve its programs, Mr. Giullo simply asked that students be provided “more comfortable chairs.”

Indeed, these are just a few of literally thousands of positive surveys, all of which can be viewed online at www.98percentapproval.com.

For those students who decided that Trump University’s programs were not for them, the company had a generous refund policy, offering a full refund to any student who asked for their money back within 3 days of signing up for a program or by the end of the first day of any multi-day program, whichever came later.

Normally, legal issues in a civil case would be heard in a neutral environment. However, given my unique circumstances as nominee of the Republican Party and the core issues of my campaign that focus on illegal immigration, jobs and unfair trade, I have concerns as to my ability to receive a fair trial.

I am fighting hard to bring jobs back to the United States. Many companies – like Ford, Nabisco, Carrier – are moving production to Mexico. Drugs and illegal immigrants are also pouring across our border. This is bad for all Americans, regardless of their heritage.

Due to what I believe are unfair and mistaken rulings in this case and the Judge’s reported associations with certain professional organizations, questions were raised regarding the Obama appointed Judge’s impartiality. It is a fair question. I hope it is not the case.

While this lawsuit should have been dismissed, it is now scheduled for trial in November. I do not intend to comment on this matter any further. With all of the thousands of people who have given the courses such high marks and accolades, we will win this case!
Donald J. Trump

 

[superbeets]

 

[The Guesser]

America First: Trump doubles down on a term that makes many Jews queasy

By Uriel HeilmanJune 8, 2016 5:45pm

Charles Lindbergh, wearing a helmet with goggles up, in the cockpit of an airplane at Lambert Field in St Louis, Mo., 1923. (Underwood Archives/Getty Images)

Donald Trump is doubling down on his America First policy.
After Trump used the term “America First” in late April to describe his policies, the Anti-Defamation League sent him a letter urging him to drop the historically tainted slogan — speaking for Jews and others who remember it as the name of the isolationist movement championed by a notorious anti-Semite to keep the United States out of World War II.
But in a speech Tuesday night following his victories in the last six state primaries, the presumptive Republican nominee for president made clear he’s not about to take the ADL’s advice and abandon the slogan.
America First, Trump said, reading from a teleprompter, means protecting American jobs from “unfair foreign competition,” tapping America’s energy resources (including coal), instituting protectionist tax and regulatory policies, loosening regulation, reducing taxes for middle-class Americans and businesses and protecting American workers from immigrants.
“It’s important to understand what ‘America first’ means,” Trump said in his speech, as if directly addressing critics of his use of the term.
At its core, Trump’s policy shares some elements with the isolationism promoted 75 years ago by leaders of the America First Committee.
Created in 1940 after Hitler already had invaded Poland, the America First Committee argued that the U.S. should take a neutral approach toward Nazi Germany, and even do business with it, because the Nazi regime did not threaten America directly. Among its most noteworthy leaders was aviator Charles Lindbergh, who publicly espoused anti-Semitic viewpoints. Lindbergh warned that Jews posed a threat to the U.S. because of their influence over the media, movies and government.
The echoes of the America First Committee in Trump’s own America First policy include but are not limited to foreign policy. Lindbergh argued in 1941 that America shouldn’t help Britain because Britain was destined to lose the war and the effort would deplete America’s defenses. Trump says he would not have intervened in Libya to topple Libyan strongman Muammar Gadhafi (though video from 2011 recently surfaced showingTrump endorsing U.S. intervention in Libya) and he opposed the war in Iraq.
As Lily Rothman has noted in Time, Lindbergh, like Trump, said he had the backing of a silent majority of Americans who weren’t being given voice by a hostile media. Back in 1941, Lindbergh fingered the Jews as the culprits, saying they were pushing the U.S. toward war through their control of the media. In this year’s campaign, Trump believes the media is against him, too – not because they’re Jews but, he says, because they’re liars.
Over time, the America First Committee’s strength waned. Though the movement, in a bid to cast off its anti-Semitic reputation, tried to advance the argument that it was looking out for the best interests of America’s Jews, many moderate isolationists steered clear.
Evidence suggests a growing majority of Americans supported U.S. intervention in the war, and the argument became moot on Dec. 7, 1941, when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. The next day, President Franklin D. Roosevelt called for and received a formal declaration of war from Congress.
“The period of democratic debate on the issue of entering the war is over,” America First Committee chair Robert Wood said. “[The committee] urges all those who have followed its lead to give their full support to the war effort of the nation, until peace is attained.”
The term America First cropped up again from time to time after that. In 1944, a group called the America First Party ran a candidate for president; the nominee got less than 2,000 votes nationwide. A write-in candidate in the 1960 presidential campaign also used that party name (winning even fewer votes than the 1944 nominee).
And in 2002, a group of activists who supported Pat Buchanan – a man many Jews consider anti-Semitic – broke off from the Reform Party to start a new America First Party. The party was pro-life, anti-gun control and anti-immigration. Its candidates went nowhere.
But even without sharing the least palatable goals of the original America First Committee, Trump seems keen on resurrecting a term with notorious baggage.
“[F]or many Americans, the term ‘America First’ will always be associated with and tainted by this history,”ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in April. “In a political season that already has prompted a national conversation about civility and tolerance, choosing a call to action historically associated with incivility and intolerance seems ill-advised.”

 

[The Guesser]

NewsBreaking NewsBritish Jews Condemn Donald Trump Ahead of Visit

Cnaan LiphshizJune 8, 2016


( JTA ) — Ahead of Donald Trump’s planned visit to Britain, leaders of that country’s Jewish community condemned what they said was the Republican presidential nominee’s “divisive and troubling” rhetoric.
Trump, who is scheduled to visit Britain on June 22, earlier this month told the Wall Street Journal that an Indiana-born judge with Mexican heritage who is overseeing a lawsuit against Trump University has an “inherent conflict of interest” given Trump’s stance against immigration from that country.
Trump is coming to Britain for the opening of a new hotel he owns in Scotland.
Jonathan Arkush, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, said that Trump’s “recent comments have been divisive and troubling,” the London-based Jewish News reported Tuesday. “The world has long looked to the United States as a beacon of progress, tolerance and free thinking. Some of Mr. Trump’s remarks undermine these values.”
Trump, Arkush added, “has not moved decisively enough to distance himself from extremist supporters” and “should now be considering the far-reaching consequences of his remarks and policy proposals before more damage is done.”
Laura Janner-Klausner, a well-known Reform rabbi, called Trump’s statements “naked appeals to bigotry.” British Jews, she said, “strongly support American liberal Jews in challenging Donald Trump and stand in solidarity with our sister movement the Union for Reform Judaism” on this issue.
The chief executive of Britain’s Liberal Judaism association, Rabbi Danny Rich, told The Jewish News: “I fear that some of Donald Trump’s rhetoric is part of a growing intolerance, and inability to discuss things rationally, that we are currently seeing in political debate all around the world.”
In New York last month, a 500-strong alliance of liberal Jews announced that they would be campaigning against Trump throughout the summer and autumn months.
Jonathan Greenblatt, Anti-Defamation League CEO, last month told the Forward that “we haven’t seen this kind of kind of mainstreaming of intolerance at this level” for decades. He added: “These ideas have no place in the mainstream and we’ll do what we need to make sure that folks understand that.”
Read more: http://forward.com/news/breaking-ne...mn-donald-trump-ahead-of-visit/#ixzz4B47uwfCT

 

[vidswaps]

 

[superbeets]

Guesser you are a vile despicable Jew hater and Jew bater. You sick failure of a human, you get off on constantly posting about Jews.


And your posting about Jews on a day when Jews were killed by ragheads in Tel Aviv, only emphasises your warped mind.

 

[superbeets]