Hilarious TRUMP Lovers

[NFLTrends]

This is hysterically funny. The media has NEVER loved a candidate more than Drumpf. The reason he is where he is, is because of the media fellating him.
His own words are used. No need to twist his crazy words.
If these were REALLY your criteria, you would be a 100% Hillary supporter, as the media hates her, and along with non supporters, routinely twists her words, AND the far left hates her.

heh, I have hated Hillary for a long long time... and I think if Bernie gets elected, he would finally see the light of the "Real World" and realize that he cant give away all those FREEBIES. But, he probobly will do something about costs and such, and would definately be a 1-term president. Hillary is hell in a handbasket.

And Trump has protestors lying at his rallies, holding signs with obvious lie, LA Time constantly attacking him with lies (Especially saying that he wants IMMIGRANTS TO LEAVE) which is a total 100% lie, which all these sheep are believeing the mantra, and not that he want ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS to leave.

And the icing on the cake is SHARTOPN AND ROSIE leaving the country!!!

 

[The Guesser]

heh, I have hated Hillary for a long long time... and I think if Bernie gets elected, he would finally see the light of the "Real World" and realize that he cant give away all those FREEBIES. But, he probobly will do something about costs and such, and would definately be a 1-term president. Hillary is hell in a handbasket.

And Trump has protestors lying at his rallies, holding signs with obvious lie, LA Time constantly attacking him with lies (Especially saying that he wants IMMIGRANTS TO LEAVE) which is a total 100% lie, which all these sheep are believeing the mantra, and not that he want ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS to leave.

And the icing on the cake is SHARTOPN AND ROSIE leaving the country!!!

Can't argue with that one, but if I had a dollar for every person who said they'd leave if XXX gets elected POTUS but doesn't, I'd have more money than Vit and Gassy combined. Sharpton's going nowhere.

 

[superbeets]

Follow

Donald J. TrumpVerified account‏@realDonaldTrump
​

I guess I have reached yet another "ceiling" - 49.7%, with four people. My highest Reuters poll yet! Thank you!

 

[superbeets]

Follow

Donald J. TrumpVerified account‏@realDonaldTrump
​

Thank you Arizona- I love you! #MakeAmericaGreatAgain #Trump2016

 

[roadreeler57]

(Raymond R Rozanski) What in the hell is wrong with the GOP??? Do they not see that Trump has been bringing in more outsiders to the Republican side? Hell, Newt Gingrich even said, that he is doing what no other damn Republican has been able to do since President Reagan! The GOP, forgets, that it is US, the members, the VOTERS that makes up the REPUBLICAN PARTY. NOT, the old stale status quo politicians who still want to dictate out comes. WE, are the ones that should decide who is OUR candidate, not Mitt Romney, funny how quickly ones appreciation of someone who , he MITT, basically was begging Trump for financial backing in his debacle of a run for the White House, Trump did, or how other RINOS like Kasich, who is, ready?????, backed by George Soros' $$$$$$!!!! Amazing! Make a stand gang! We, cannot afford to have another left wing brain dead libtard/socialist ( yes hitlery is one too, she just doesn't have the guts to come right out and admit it, then again what do you expect from a perpetual liar?) in OUR White House! NOR, a sellout RINO. The damn Dumbocrats are sitting back, ONCE AGAIN, laughing at what is going on in the Republican Party. All the bickering, the lack of cohesiveness, it's a disgrace. What really gets my frigging goat, is if you remember when there was 16 candidates, the question about signing on to support whoever is the winning candidate, Trump initially said NO, they were all up in arms about that! Then, Donald said ok he'd sign! He did! See they figured he'd NEVER get this far, never get the support of THE PEOPLE! He disproved them all, he showed what he was made of, spoke out, talked about what millions of Real Americans have been pissed off about and fed up with the bullshit that's been going on. NOW, the same ones are bitching and saying they will not back him!!!! Haaaaa! You wonder why the Dumbocrats are laughing??? You, wonder why they are salivating, that the witch bitch has a better chance????? Time for the GOP to grow a pair again and get behind what the AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT, be they from whatever affiliation. Hey, IT'S TIME TO WAKE THE HELL UP AMERICA! God help US/U.S.! God bless America!

 

[roadreeler57]

‎The Trump Party

2 hrs ·
Anti Trump Person fatally shoots self in face taking selfie





IDIOT Fatally Shoots Himself In The Face While Taking ANTI TRUMP selfie.
Taking a selfie with a loaded gun ended tragically in Washington, when a man accidentally shot himself in the face while taking a picture. His girlfriend wa
SILENCEISCONSENT.NET

2 shares
Comments

3 of 12
View previous comments




Sheila Akros dumb ass bitch

Like · Reply · 2 · 1 hr








Mike Olson Bernie's people are so smart please explain ...lol

Like · Reply · 2 · 1 hr








Stan Ostrowsky What a idiot.

Like · Reply · 1 · 1 hr

 

[The Guesser]

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-violence-kent-state-213733

Could Trump’s Hate-Baiting Lead to Another Kent State?

Words matter. Trump needs to stop the agitation before the violence turns deadly, like it did in 1970.
By JAMES ROBENALT
March 15, 2016
​

AP Photo


Donald Trump is now openly inciting violence at his rallies. In Kansas City, he mouthed the words, “I’ll beat the crap out of you,” when describing what he would have done to a protester who charged him in Dayton, Ohio, earlier in the day. “Boom, boom, boom,” he said, mimicking a schoolyard beat down with his fists.
“Part of the problem is … nobody wants to hurt each other anymore,” he yelled at protesters in St. Louis who were being physically ejected from his event. “The audience hit back,” he said earlier at a news conference in Florida, “that’s what we need a little bit more of.”


As Trump grandstanded, agitating the crowd, encouraging and condoning physical attacks against protesters,his supporters cheered.
It was an alarming development in this bizarre and unpredictable campaign for the presidency. Presidential words carry real, sometimes severe consequences, and to hear a candidate for the office so glibly stirring up violence is nothing short of startling.
One begins to wonder if a wide swath of American voters have no historical memory at all. If people today think that Trump’s agitation is appropriate, or as he puts it, basically harmless, then they were not alive during the Nixon administration in 1970, when exactly this sort of reckless political hate-mongering held America in its awful grip—and even took a deadly turn.
Since I recently wrote a book about Richard Nixon and in the process listened to hundreds of hours of his White House tapes, I can’t help but draw comparisons between Nixon and Trump. Nixon was a savvy political operator; so is Trump. Nixon appealed to the angry and alienated; so does Trump. And Nixon played to the fear of displacement in the social order; so does Trump. And then, of course, there’s their shared tendency to say things in anger or spite, without really thinking of the results, or worse, knowing the consequences, but still plowing forward.
In a highly charged political atmosphere—whether in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when America was divided over Vietnam, civil rights and how to address urban crime, or today, when we’re agitated over terrorism, economic inequality and unprecedented congressional gridlock—rhetoric that inflames and exposes long-simmering racial prejudices and hatreds serves to only add an element of unacceptable danger to our already volatile political process. It can happen in 2016—just like it happened in 1970.
On April 30, 1970, Nixon surprised the nation (and many in his Cabinet) with an announcement that he was invading Cambodia.
All hell broke loose across the nation. Americans, especially college students who were subject to the draft, thought the war had been winding down. Now it was escalating. Protests racked the country, nowhere more than on college campuses.
The day after the announcement of the invasion (“incursion” if you supported Nixon), Nixon visited the Pentagon and as he was leaving he stopped to speak extemporaneously to Pentagon workers. In Trump-like fashion, Nixon callously referred to college protesters as “bums.” His remarks were caught by the media and widely printed in newspapers.
This was an incitement.
That weekend, students at Kent State University in Ohio burned down the ROTC building on their campus. Two days later, on Monday, May 4, National Guard troops sent in to restore order wheeled in unison on a hill and opened fire on unarmed students, killing four and seriously wounding many others.
If you have ever walked the grounds at Kent State and stood where the troops stood and looked out for the memorials to the dead students in a parking lot several football fields away, you instantly realize these young men in the National Guard could hardly have made out the faces of the young people they were shooting and killing.
Nixon’s chief of staff, H. R. “Bob” Haldeman, kept an amazing diary of happenings while he was in the White House. As events spiraled out of control following the shootings, with college campuses shutting down and students descending on Washington by the tens of thousands, Haldeman recorded that he and Nixon realized that the president’s thoughtless and provocative language played a role in the Kent State tragedy and the subsequent campus unrest.
On May 6, two days after the shootings, Haldeman wrote: “As day went on, concern from outside about campus crisis built rapidly. All of us had lots of calls and memos, etc. P came to grips with it this afternoon. Obviously realizes, but won’t openly admit, his ‘bums’ remark very harmful.”
One of the stricken fathers of a young woman killed at Kent State could only mutter to the media: “My daughter was not a bum.”
Words matter. Before we end up with another version of Kent State—perhaps at a Trump rally, at a university or at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July—Trump needs to get ahold of himself and condemn violence at his rallies. He needs to stop the agitation. No one wants to revisit a time when we had to bury our own children simply because they protested in favor of peace.

 

[superbeets]

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-violence-kent-state-213733

Could Trump’s Hate-Baiting Lead to Another Kent State?

Words matter. Trump needs to stop the agitation before the violence turns deadly, like it did in 1970.
By JAMES ROBENALT
March 15, 2016
​

AP Photo


Donald Trump is now openly inciting violence at his rallies. In Kansas City, he mouthed the words, “I’ll beat the crap out of you,” when describing what he would have done to a protester who charged him in Dayton, Ohio, earlier in the day. “Boom, boom, boom,” he said, mimicking a schoolyard beat down with his fists.
“Part of the problem is … nobody wants to hurt each other anymore,” he yelled at protesters in St. Louis who were being physically ejected from his event. “The audience hit back,” he said earlier at a news conference in Florida, “that’s what we need a little bit more of.”


As Trump grandstanded, agitating the crowd, encouraging and condoning physical attacks against protesters,his supporters cheered.
It was an alarming development in this bizarre and unpredictable campaign for the presidency. Presidential words carry real, sometimes severe consequences, and to hear a candidate for the office so glibly stirring up violence is nothing short of startling.
One begins to wonder if a wide swath of American voters have no historical memory at all. If people today think that Trump’s agitation is appropriate, or as he puts it, basically harmless, then they were not alive during the Nixon administration in 1970, when exactly this sort of reckless political hate-mongering held America in its awful grip—and even took a deadly turn.
Since I recently wrote a book about Richard Nixon and in the process listened to hundreds of hours of his White House tapes, I can’t help but draw comparisons between Nixon and Trump. Nixon was a savvy political operator; so is Trump. Nixon appealed to the angry and alienated; so does Trump. And Nixon played to the fear of displacement in the social order; so does Trump. And then, of course, there’s their shared tendency to say things in anger or spite, without really thinking of the results, or worse, knowing the consequences, but still plowing forward.
In a highly charged political atmosphere—whether in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when America was divided over Vietnam, civil rights and how to address urban crime, or today, when we’re agitated over terrorism, economic inequality and unprecedented congressional gridlock—rhetoric that inflames and exposes long-simmering racial prejudices and hatreds serves to only add an element of unacceptable danger to our already volatile political process. It can happen in 2016—just like it happened in 1970.
On April 30, 1970, Nixon surprised the nation (and many in his Cabinet) with an announcement that he was invading Cambodia.
All hell broke loose across the nation. Americans, especially college students who were subject to the draft, thought the war had been winding down. Now it was escalating. Protests racked the country, nowhere more than on college campuses.
The day after the announcement of the invasion (“incursion” if you supported Nixon), Nixon visited the Pentagon and as he was leaving he stopped to speak extemporaneously to Pentagon workers. In Trump-like fashion, Nixon callously referred to college protesters as “bums.” His remarks were caught by the media and widely printed in newspapers.
This was an incitement.
That weekend, students at Kent State University in Ohio burned down the ROTC building on their campus. Two days later, on Monday, May 4, National Guard troops sent in to restore order wheeled in unison on a hill and opened fire on unarmed students, killing four and seriously wounding many others.
If you have ever walked the grounds at Kent State and stood where the troops stood and looked out for the memorials to the dead students in a parking lot several football fields away, you instantly realize these young men in the National Guard could hardly have made out the faces of the young people they were shooting and killing.
Nixon’s chief of staff, H. R. “Bob” Haldeman, kept an amazing diary of happenings while he was in the White House. As events spiraled out of control following the shootings, with college campuses shutting down and students descending on Washington by the tens of thousands, Haldeman recorded that he and Nixon realized that the president’s thoughtless and provocative language played a role in the Kent State tragedy and the subsequent campus unrest.
On May 6, two days after the shootings, Haldeman wrote: “As day went on, concern from outside about campus crisis built rapidly. All of us had lots of calls and memos, etc. P came to grips with it this afternoon. Obviously realizes, but won’t openly admit, his ‘bums’ remark very harmful.”
One of the stricken fathers of a young woman killed at Kent State could only mutter to the media: “My daughter was not a bum.”
Words matter. Before we end up with another version of Kent State—perhaps at a Trump rally, at a university or at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July—Trump needs to get ahold of himself and condemn violence at his rallies. He needs to stop the agitation. No one wants to revisit a time when we had to bury our own children simply because they protested in favor of peace.

Nothing to do with Trump.

This is organised rent a mob filth and scum, a mixture of anarchists, criminals, totalitarians, black lives matter and other trash. They want to prevent democracy.

They will fail, America has grown wise to these scum and people are voting that have never voted before, to prevent these scum hijacking democracy.



Trump rallies are peaceful, Trump supporters come to rallies to hear Trump, they leave peacefully, they don't leave rallies and go smashing and burning property and looting. The trouble causers are those that go to disrupt these peaceful rallies.

 

[superbeets]

US Election 2016: Trump card could secure victory over Clinton in game of demographics

Both likely major party nominees are viewed unfavourably by a majority of the electorate

• Rupert Cornwell Washington
• @IndyVoices
• Wednesday 16 March 2016

With Hillary Clinton – barring an email-related bombshell from the FBI – now virtually certain to be the Democratic nominee, and Donald Trump heavy favourite to be her Republican opponent in November, both campaigns are now focusing on a vital aspect of the race: how to win the demographics game that decides US presidential elections. And in this remarkable 2016 cycle, some old certainties may no longer hold.

Her wins in Florida, Ohio, North Carolina and Illinois on Tuesday leave no doubt Mrs Clinton is in firm command of the key Democratic constituencies of blacks, Hispanics and women voters. That is likely to remain the case this autumn, if Mr Trump wins his party’s nomination. But she may be vulnerable elsewhere.


Once white working-class voters were a lynchpin of the Democratic coalition. That began to change in 1980 with the emergence of the “Reagan Democrats” – mostly blue-collar white Americans in the old industrial heartland upset by the liberal cultural policies of their traditional party. Since then, Democrats have never been able to win them back entirely. Now Mr Trump is making his own play for them.


The exact cross-over vote this primary season is impossible to quantify. But record turnouts in many Republican primaries this season – and the fact that Mr Trump tends to do better in “open” primaries, where a voter can choose either the Republican or Democratic ballot at the polling station itself – suggest that many white working-class Democrats are buying his argument: that the US is in big trouble, that immigration and free trade are destroying the national fabric, and that ordinary Democrats and Republicans alike have been duped and betrayed by the ruling elites in Washington.



Some analysts reckon five million or more white voters simply didn’t bother to turn out in 2012. Mitt Romney won 59 per cent of those that did; had he boosted that to 63 per cent, all other things being equal, he would have won. That plainly is Mr Trump’s calculation now – that an increase in turnout by whites (who still account for 63 per cent of the voting-age population) will nullify any surge in turnout by Hispanics put off by his tirades against immigrants and threats to build a wall along the southern US border. Hispanics (and Asians) in any case are less assiduous voters than whites and blacks.



In 2012, barely 40 per cent of Hispanics voted, compared to over 60 per cent of whites. With overall turnouts of 59 and 55 per cent in 2008 and 2012 respectively, there is plainly potential to expand the Republican vote, not least among people who have never voted before, but who attend Mr Trump’s giant rallies across the country.



In taking this approach moreover, Mr Trump would be flying in the face of the Republican National Committee’s official post mortem into Mr Romney’s defeat. To counter seemingly inexorable demographic trends, the party must increase its appeal to Hispanics, women and the middle class. In five of the past six presidential elections, the RNC noted, Republicans had lost the popular vote. But time and again, the property tycoon has overturned party orthodoxy. Why not once more?



Against this must be set a huge uncertainty. Some white working-class Democrats undoubtedly will go for Mr Trump. But how many normally Republican voters simply will not vote for him under any circumstances? For perhaps the first time ever, both likely major party nominees are viewed unfavourably by a majority of the electorate. But Mr Trump’s ratings are even worse than those of Ms Clinton – 63 per cent negative, according to Gallup, compared to “only” 53 per cent for Ms Clinton

 

[superbeets]

 

[The Guesser]

Nothing to do with Trump.hno:
This is organised rent a mob filth and scum, a mixture of anarchists, criminals, totalitarians, black lives matter and other trash. They want to prevent democracy.

They will fail, America has grown wise to these scum and people are voting that have never voted before, to prevent these scum hijacking democracy.



Trump rallies are peaceful, Trump supporters come to rallies to hear Trump, they leave peacefully, they don't leave rallies and go smashing and burning property and looting. The trouble causers are those that go to disrupt these peaceful rallies.

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

 

[Dafinch]

Love how Colbert makes Drumpf look like a complete and utter idiot:

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search...Colbert&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002

 

[superbeets]

Love how Colbert makes Drumpf look like a complete and utter idiot:

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search...Colbert&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002

 

[superbeets]

Originally Posted by Dafinch
Love how Colbert makes Drumpf look like a complete and utter idiot:

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?...&hsimp=yhs-002


[h=6]- MARCH 19, 2016 -[/h][h=1]TUCSON BORDER PATROL UNION: TRUMP IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE SUPPORTING OUR MISSION AND OUR AGENTS[/h](Arizona) March 19th, 2016 - Tucson Border Patrol Agents have issued a statement to voters ahead of Tuesday's Arizona primary explaining how Donald Trump is the only presidential candidate who has stood with Border Patrol Agents and supported their mission. The statement was issued by Local 2544 of the National Border Patrol Council. Local 2544, representing Tucson Agents, is the largest chapter in the Border Patrol Union. The statement, posted to their website, was released by their chapter President, Art Del Cueto:

"On March 19th, 2016 Donald Trump’s campaign reached out to Local 2544 about a potential endorsement. I informed Mr. Trump’s campaign that NBPC had long standing practice of not endorsing Presidential candidates and that as the President of Local 2544, and I would continue to adhere to that practice.

However, the National Border Patrol Council and Local 2544 are pleased to inform voters that Mr. Trump is the only candidate that has publicly expressed his support of our mission and our agents. He has been an outspoken candidate on the need for a Secure Border and for this we are grateful.

The American public has continually called for a secure border and Donald Trump has promised to make this desire a reality. His campaign has expressed an interest in a Border Patrol’s Agent’s perspective and a tour of our border, that we will gladly provide. We do not seek to give tours but if asked we will happily provide a tour that gives a realistic idea of what our agents face on a daily basis. Donald Trump is the only candidate who has expressed this interest.

We are confident that the National Border Patrol Council’s longstanding message about the unsecured border and much needed support for our Agents will be received well by Mr. Trump. The American public deserves to be secure in their own country and we encourage all voters to consider that candidate that has the political will to make it happen."

To view the statement on Local 2544's website, please click here. Mr. Trump is deeply grateful for the selfless public service of Border Patrol Agents protecting our nation. Mr. Trump stands strongly behind all Border Patrol Agents and will completely secure the border, enforce all federal immigration laws, safeguard U.S. communities, and finally give our Border Patrol Agents the tools, support and resources they need to fulfill their vital mission.

 

[superbeets]

Love how Colbert makes Drumpf look like a complete and utter idiot:

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search...Colbert&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002

Follow

Donald J. TrumpVerified account‏@realDonaldTrump
​

THANK YOU ARIZONA! 20,000 amazing supporters! Get out and #VoteTrump on Tuesday. I love you!#MakeAmericaGreatAgain

 

[Dafinch]

Follow

Donald J. TrumpVerified account‏@realDonaldTrump
​

THANK YOU ARIZONA! 20,000 amazing supporters! Get out and #VoteTrump on Tuesday. I love you!#MakeAmericaGreatAgain

First of all, all you're showing is that there are millions of idiots who will vote for a racist sack of shit who constantly speaks out of both sides of his moouth. You know who ELSE is an idiot? A guy who posts about Great Britain being at war, and, at least glance, had made over 40 consecutive posts without a single other poster making a comment. Know what that means, Brainiac? NOBODY GIVES A SHIT AND YOU'RE A MORON....

 

[superbeets]

First of all, all you're showing is that there are millions of idiots who will vote for a racist sack of shit who constantly speaks out of both sides of his moouth. You know who ELSE is an idiot? A guy who posts about Great Britain being at war, and, at least glance, had made over 40 consecutive posts without a single other poster making a comment. Know what that means, Brainiac? NOBODY GIVES A SHIT AND YOU'RE A MORON....

Wow millions of idiots. You are so disrespectful of the electorate. But that is it, you are part of the vocal minority who want to usurp democracy.

Well you will fail. The majority will prevail. Get used to it. Trump is a winner, you are a loser. You have Trump anxiety, get some psychotherapy boy.