you wouldn't understand brilliance, you have no experience with it
you just know victims
you wouldn't understand brilliance, you have no experience with it
you just know victims
poker fraud vtard's impressive frame of reference: "year after year, election after election" = 2 elections
libtards get whipped when their low income low info low education low motivation lazy base doesn't get off their 2nd hand couches and walk out their section 8 housing to vote in off years
you would think somebody who follows politics could see such an obvious trend, but they like to pretend they're smart, even though the proof is in the exit polls
that debate is over
Please stop talking about politics, voting demo and pretty much everything. You embarrassed yourself leading up to the 2012 election so much, you would think it would stop you. No self awareness at all.
For as much as you accuse others of "sound byte " politics ....that's all you got. The assault you have on poor people is amazingly stupid. Considering if those in poverty didn't vote( which most don't anyway ) Obama still has 2 terms.
You aren't even low information .....we are talking no information and in most cases flat out lies. Be glad you have like minded idiots here.
I actually don't mind assistance programs, I'm an advocate for safety nets, I'm not a hardcore libertarian, but I'm mocking people who pretend voting demographics are different than what they are. They're delusional, disconnected, silly and stupid.
And while I'm an advocate for safety nets, I despise those who make it a career choice and those who won't even try, I hate the victim-hood mentality, can't stand lame excuses and enabling politicians. And this economic demographic votes one sided more so than any other economic demographic in the country.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president/exit-polls
People earning more than 50K (not a very high threshold), Romney wins with 53% of the vote nationally
States that swing to Romney
OH
FL
VA
PA
IA
WI
NV
to argue low income demographics didn't put the least prepared man in the room over the top is as dumb as it comes, just plain ignorant
People earning more than 50K (not a very high threshold), Romney wins with 53% of the vote nationally
States that swing to Romney
OH
FL
VA
PA
IA
WI
NV
to argue low income demographics didn't put the least prepared man in the room over the top is as dumb as it comes, just plain ignorant
Your argument has always been those in poverty and leeches are the dem base and put Obama in office. Does that include those making 49k a year. You set the bar where you want to fit your bullshit story. We know many of those on getting govt asst are single white women who hardly vote.
The bottom line is this....take away the votes of those living in poverty and those getting welfare and Obama still wins both elections. Learn to see who is voting and why Obama wins.....it will make you look less stupid when predicting elections.
why do you think someone who earns more money is the better person or deserves more of a vote. I know tons of scumbags thieves that make lots of money. The things conservatives value as important.....is exactly why many of you are viewed how you are.
Probably a true statement. The Republican Party has become more divided within itself than our entire government has as a whole. The problem is(in my mind anyway) there is still not a good viable candidate to vote for. It's the same thing where I am forced to vote for the lesser of two evils.
