Agree Miami is improved. All metric systems need some sort of human element factored in. For me, this includes the ebb's and flows of a schedule, such as when the bye weeks occur, revenge games, trap games, MNF, followed by a short week, consecutive stressful conference games followed by a perceived .500 out of conference foe, etc. In addition, we all have our somewhat subjective views of coaches, but it should at least be taken into account that Miami's HC has made a few blunders here and there. Not ready to buy into Miami just yet, but do think New England is more vulnerable this year than per usual (rebuilt secondary, no RB Vereen who was underrated and reliable in all facets of game, Brady a year older, still not utilizing deep WR routes, etc.).