and Bo's experience again? All I ask is that one applies logic consistently. "Logic" is not the process of starting with your desired conclusion and then backing into your reasoning, which is what's at play here.
If you think Palin is too inexperienced, you cannot believe Obama is qualified.
Furthermore, Palin is not running for the top spot, chances are far greater that she'll have time to get her feet wet than she won't have time. Obama, on the other hand, will be the most inexperienced President in the history of our nation (bubba talk here).