all of you are nuts. i liked the fight and was right on board (as most have been all over the net) with where the decision came down.
i could have seen 47-47 with 2 rounds to 3 but with a 10-8 in the second. i gave 2,3, and 5 to griffin so i was not shocked at all but i could have seen 3 going either way.
anyone who says "Griffin sucked" or whatever really does not understand the sport. Griffin got a leg taken away early in the second... he did not gas as he has been known to do and he kept moving forward even on a busted up leg and clipping forrest with great strikes.
forrest had a great strategy of working that leg and it worked and he won and that is that.
i could have seen 47-47 with 2 rounds to 3 but with a 10-8 in the second. i gave 2,3, and 5 to griffin so i was not shocked at all but i could have seen 3 going either way.
anyone who says "Griffin sucked" or whatever really does not understand the sport. Griffin got a leg taken away early in the second... he did not gas as he has been known to do and he kept moving forward even on a busted up leg and clipping forrest with great strikes.
forrest had a great strategy of working that leg and it worked and he won and that is that.