I wasn't here at the time of the 12-month ban that JC got. But the fact that he served 10 months of that bet and worked out a deal with the other party to shorten the duration of the bet automatically makes him more honorable than Welchbacks.
I don't know the man's life details and honestly I don't give a shit. That fact alone makes what JC did more honorable than what Welchbacks did.
If you're gonna scold JC, then you need to be scolding Greebacks ten times worse.
If you have a problem with JC and want to pester him for other reasons, then fine. But don't act like you aren't biased/simply don't like the guy.
I don't care who posts or who doesn't and I think Ban bets are as gay as it gets. Greenbacks offered a cash bet but Cruise wussed out.
Your assessment is completely wrong. The point being, Cruise has no right to cry about something that he himself has done twice. (1) He started posting before an arrangement was worked out. (2) He also blew of a self ban bet.
Similar to Choptalk. This guy posted a fake betting slip in which he changed the bet amount. Then when he got caught he knowingly blamed another poster and said the other poster changed it. He continued to lie over and over again until he finally had to fess up. So, like JC, I don't care if Choptalk posts or not, however, he shouldn't be talking about integrity and being a straight shooter. Just like Cruise should't be crying about Greenbacks.
So there is no bias at all.
You notice JC won't directly answer my questions.