Global Warming or Global Bullshit?

[Willie99]

Too many details and predictions for a liar to talk about, time will do it's thing and the world would (or should) know you're a asshole.

The fucking idiots don't know the truth about his predictions of course, because they're fucking idiots

It's a genetic thing, something upstairs just doesn't function properly. If we're lucky, maybe their continued evolution might fix that eventually .

 

[SheriffJoe]

Delingpole: Twelve Debunked Climate Scares We Can Laugh at in 2019

2,2​

JASON CONNOLLY/AFP/Getty3 Jan 2019

4:54​

2019 won’t be the year the climate change scare finally dies, unfortunately. But the people pushing it will look increasingly desperate, sad and piteously short of evidence to support their junk science theories.

Here, courtesy of the Global Warming Policy Forum, are the top twelve climate scares debunked in 2018. Share it with your alarmist friends to wish them a happy, sceptical New Year.

January 2018: Worst-case global warming scenarios not credible: Study

PARIS (AFP) – Earth’s surface will almost certainly not warm up four or five degrees Celsius by 2100, according to a study released Wednesday (Jan 17) which, if correct, voids worst-case UN climate change predictions.

A revised calculation of how greenhouse gases drive up the planet’s temperature reduces the range of possible end-of-century outcomes by more than half, researchers said in the report, published in the journal Nature.

February: ‘Sinking’ Pacific nation Tuvalu is actually getting bigger, new research reveals

The Pacific nation of Tuvalu — long seen as a prime candidate to disappear as climate change forces up sea levels — is actually growing in size, new research shows.
A University of Auckland study examined changes in the geography of Tuvalu’s nine atolls and 101 reef islands between 1971 and 2014, using aerial photographs and satellite imagery.

It found eight of the atolls and almost three-quarters of the islands grew during the study period, lifting Tuvalu’s total land area by 2.9 percent, even though sea levels in the country rose at twice the global average.

March: BBC forced to retract false claim about hurricanes

You may recall the above report by the BBC, which described how bad last year’s Atlantic hurricane season was, before commenting at the end: “A warmer world is bringing us a greater number of hurricanes and a greater risk of a hurricane becoming the most powerful category 5.” I fired off a complaint, which at first they did their best to dodge. After my refusal to accept their reply, they have now been forced to back down

April: Corals can withstand another 100-250 Years of climate change, new study

Heat-tolerant genes may spread through coral populations fast enough to give the marine creatures a tool to survive another 100-250 years of warming in our oceans.

May: Climate change causes beaches to grow by 3,660 square kilometers

Since 1984 humans have gushed forth 64% of our entire emissions from fossil fuels. (Fully 282,000 megatons of deplorable carbon “pollution”.) During this time, satellite images show that 24% of our beaches shrank, while 28% grew. Thus we can say that thanks to the carbon apocalypse there are 3,660 sq kms more global beaches now than there were thirty years ago.

June: Antarctica not losing ice, NASA researcher finds

NASA glaciologist Jay Zwally says his new study will show, once again, the eastern Antarctic ice sheet is gaining enough ice to offset losses in the west.

July: National Geographic admits they were wrong about notorious starving polar bear-climate claims

The narrative behind the viral photo of a polar bear starving, reportedly thanks to climate change, has been called into question by the National Geographic photographer who took it in the first place.

August: New study shows declining risk and increasing resilience to extreme weather in France

This risk factor for French residents of cities stricken by a disaster has been falling with every passing decade.

September: Coral bleaching is a natural event that has gone on for centuries, new study

Coral bleaching has been a regular feature of the Great Barrier Reef for the past 400 years, with evidence of repeated mass events dating back to well before Euro*pean settlement and the start of the industrial revolution.

October: Climate predictions could be wrong in UK and Europe

Current climate change predictions in the UK and parts of Europe may be inaccurate, a study conducted by researchers from the University of Lincoln, UK, and the University of Liège, Belgium, suggests.

November: Number and intensity of US hurricanes have remained constant since 1900

There’s been “no trend” in the number and intensity of hurricanes hitting the continental U.S. and the normalized damages caused by such storms over the past 117 years, according to a new study.

December: Alarmist sea level rise scenarios unlikely, says climate scientist Judith Curry

A catastrophic rise in sea levels is unlikely this century, with recent experience falling within the range of natural variability over the past several thousand years, according to a report on peer-*reviewed studies by US climate scientist Judith Curry.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...unked-climate-scares-we-can-laugh-at-in-2019/

 

[rolltide]

 

[RunMaker]

You guys are on to the scam.... but do you know where this scam came (((from)))?

Funny how it's a money extraction scheme from governments orchestrated and organized by you know (((who))).

 

[StevieRay]

Lol

 

[SheriffJoe]

 

[SheriffJoe]

AOC believes in Al Gore's "climate change" and that the world will end in 12 years.

If that isn't the final nail in the coffin for this scam I don't know what is.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Global Warming:

You think it's been cold in SW California this month? Check out the link below highlighting Downtown L.A. With just 4 days remaining this month, Feb 2019 ranks as the coldest February at #DTLA since 1962 nearly 60 years ago. #cawx #SoCal #LAweather

https://go.usa.gov/xEy6J

5:44 AM - 25 Feb 2019

 

[festeringZit]

Global Warming:

You think it's been cold in SW California this month? Check out the link below highlighting Downtown L.A. With just 4 days remaining this month, Feb 2019 ranks as the coldest February at #DTLA since 1962 nearly 60 years ago. #cawx#SoCal#LAweather

https://go.usa.gov/xEy6J

5:44 AM - 25 Feb 2019

Joe,

Didn't you know that according to libTardism, Global Warming causes colder temperatures? At least that is, when it's not causing warmer temperatures... funny
how that works. Liberalism sucks ass.

 

[Michelangelo]

It was snowing in Vegas a few days ago.

 

[Coldweather]

Global warming, what a bunch of crap! Just a liberal talking point to grab

self -serving political money to get reelected ! It's cold outside side! cheersgif

 

[theDonger]

A bunch of Trumptards who don't know the difference between weather and climate.

You guys really are an embarrassment. Do you talk this way in public?

 

[festeringZit]

A bunch of Trumptards who don't know the difference between weather and climate.

You guys really are an embarrassment. Do you talk this way in public?

If you believe the man-made global warming charade, you sir are the fucking dumb ass.

 

[theDonger]

If you believe the man-made global warming charade, you sir are the fucking dumb ass.

I might be a dumbass, but I know the difference between weather and climate.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

I might be a dumbass, but I know the difference between weather and climate.

Good for you!

 

[rolltide]

Australia's initial study found long-term cooling of 0.28 C over 100+ years so 6 years ago they changed the numbers to show a 1.7 C increase to get in line with other models and then this week pulled the eraser out again and created even more regional warming trend. In the past when the data didn't prove your hypothesis you rethought your position but now you just change the data. You can never be wrong saying "climate change" instead of "global warming" and you really, really can't be wrong when you simply plug the numbers into a computer then graph it

The ‘trick’: How More Cooling Generates Global Warming

March 5, 2019
From the “we’ll fix that in post” department comes this from down under courtesy of Dr. Jennifer Marohasy.

COOLING the past relative to the present has the general effect of making the present appear hotter – it is a way of generating more global warming for the same weather.

The Bureau of Meteorology has rewritten Australia’s temperature in this way for the second time in just six years – increasing the rate of warming by 23 percent between Version 1 and the new Version 2 of the official ACORN-SAT temperature record.

Temperatures from the Rutherglen research station in rural Victoria are one of the 112 weather stations that make-up ACORN-SAT. Temperature have been changed here by Blair Trewin, under the supervision of David Jones at the Bureau.

Dr Jones’s enthusiasm for the concept of human-caused global warming is documented in the notorious Climategate emails, during which he wrote in an email to Phil Jones at the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit on 7 September 2007 that:

“Truth be known, climate change here is now running so rampant that we don’t need meteorological data to see it.”
​

We should not jump to any conclusion that support for human-caused global warming theory is the unstated reason for the Bureau’s most recent remodelling of Rutherglen. Dr Jones is an expert meteorologist and an honourable man.

We must simply keep asking,

“What are the scientifically valid reasons for the changes that the Bureau has made to the temperature records?”
​

In 2014, Graham Lloyd, Environmental Reporter at The Australian, quoting me, explained how a cooling trend in the minimum temperature record at Rutherglen had been changed into a warming trend by progressively reducing temperatures from 1973 back to 1913. For the year 1913, there was a large difference of 1.7 degrees Celsius between the mean annual minimum temperature, as measured at Rutherglen using standard equipment at this official weather station, and the remodelled ACORN-SAT Version 1 temperature. The Bureau responded to Lloyd, claiming that the changes were necessary because the weather recording equipment had been moved between paddocks. This is not a logical explanation in the flat local terrain, and furthermore the official ACORN-SAT catalogue clearly states that there has never been a site move.
Australians might nevertheless want to give the Bureau the benefit of the doubt and let them make a single set of apparently necessary changes. But now, just six years later, the Bureau has again changed the temperature record for Rutherglen.

In Version 2 of ACORN-SAT for Rutherglen, the minimum temperatures as recorded in the early 1900s, have been further reduced, making the present appear even warmer relative to the past. The warming trend is now 1.9 degrees Celsius per century.

The Bureau has also variously claimed that they need to cool that past at Rutherglen to make the temperature trend more consistent with trends at neighbouring locations. But this claim is not supported by the evidence. For example, the raw data at the nearby towns of Deniliquin, Echuca and Benalla also show cooling. The consistent cooling in the minimum temperatures is associated with land-use change in this region: specifically, the staged introduction of irrigation.

Australians trust the Bureau of Meteorology as our official source of weather information, wisdom and advice. So, we are entitled to ask the Bureau to explain: If the statements provided to date do not justify changing historic temperature records, what are the scientifically valid reasons for doing so?

The changes made to ACORN-SAT Version 2 begin with changes to the daily temperatures. For example, on the first day of temperature recordings at Rutherglen, 8 November 1912, the measured minimum temperature is 10.6 degrees Celsius. This measurement is changed to 7.6 degrees Celsius in ACORN-SAT Version 1. In Version 2, the already remodeled value is changed again, to 7.4 degrees Celsius – applying a further cooling of 0.2 degrees Celsius.

Considering historically significant events, for example temperatures at Rutherglen during the January 1939 bushfires that devastated large areas of Victoria, the changes made to the historical record are even more significant. The minimum temperature on the hottest day was measured as 28.3 degrees Celsius at the Rutherglen Research Station. This value was changed to 27.8 degrees Celsius in ACORN Version 1, a reduction of 0.5 degrees Celsius. In Version 2, the temperature is reduced by a further 2.6 degrees Celsius, producing a temperature of 25.7 degrees Celsius.

This type of remodelling will potentially have implications for understanding the relationship between past temperatures and bushfire behavior. Of course, changing the data in this way will also affect analysis of climate variability and change into the future. By reducing past temperature, there is potential for new record hottest days for the same weather.

Annual average minimum temperatures at Rutherglen (1913 to 2017). Raw temperatures (green) show a mild cooling trend of 0.28 degrees Celsius per 100 years. This cooling trend has been changed to warming of 1.7 degrees Celsius per 100 years in ACORN-SAT Version 1 (orange). These temperatures have been further remodeled in ACORN-SAT Version 1 (red) to give even more dramatic warming, which is now 1.9 degrees Celsius.

​

 

[NorthernStar]

I was actually the warmer speaker for another speaker.

He is a very successful businessman starting multiple companies in the weather related industry that were sold for multi-millions.

He started out his speech asking people in the audience to raise their hand if they considered themselves open minded. Then he asked them to think of the last time they had changed their opinion on anything. I thought this was a great statement because too many people are closed minded and wont ever change their opinion.

He stated that he was a conservative, christian republican and he wondered how climate change became a republican/democrat issue.

He also challenged the republicans in the audience about being conservatives. When does being a conservative become an ala carte? I am conservative about some issues and not on other issues?

He talked about having studied weather data for over 30 years. More so than anyone on this website. What he said was there will continue to be larger swings in the magnitude of weather storms and weather patterns. So we will see more heavy rainstorms, severe hurricane, toranado's and it could later be followed by areas of droughts etc.

He said one of the reasons for the severity of the storms is that the storms will not move as quickly. A perfect example of this was the hurricane in Houston. If it is raining at say 2 inches an hour and the storm is moving at 20 mph the amount of rain would be X. Since the storm moved extremely slow the amount of rain became record breaking.

He thinks that this will be what we will see moving forward. So now when I see another "record breaking" storm or extreme it seems to reenforce what he said in his speech. So extremes are not just increases in temperature but the extremes in overall weather. We just had our snowiest February in history and it wasn't close. Other places may experience a severe drought and a few years later experience flash flooding.

So open your mind and observe what you see around you.

 

[Willie99]

Climate change is real, the climate has been changing for two billion years and will continue to change. Some of those changes will be catastrophic. The deniers are the people that think they can stop climate change.

The earth's temperatures are warming, they've been increasing since the end of the last ice age, about 17,000 years ago. Throughout the planet's history, it's had 20,000 year cycles of global warming followed by 70,000 years of global cooling. Man didn't create those cycles, I doubt renewable energy sources are going to stop those cycles.

We've had weather extremes throughout recorded history, as with everything in life, we tend to believe the most recent extremes are the only thing that matters.

Remember Algore and global warming alarmists telling us hurricane seasons like 2005 were going to be the new norm? Well they couldn't be more wrong, and that being wrong about catastrophic predictions applies to a ton of material.

I think mankind needs to prepare to survive ongoing climate change, and I know without a shadow of a doubt that driving smaller cars is not the solution. We're barking up the wrong tree

 

[Acebb]

4th coldest first week of March in the last 100 years here in Pittsburgh.

 

[Acebb]

He is a very successful businessman starting multiple companies in the weather related industry that were sold for multi-millions.

So what?

Nothing he says has any value or basis in science.