You wouldn't know what a "smart person" is because you're an abject imbecile who can not read.
See dum-dum, you want to come here and argue that words don't mean what they say, probably because you're so busy with work and are like super-smart and stuff all the while pretending that "consensus" has anything to do with science.
Fact it, simpleton you don't know the topic and don't care to know. You're a loser bored in the trailer so you're posting dumbshit responses because you have nothing better to do.
Look what this proven douche bag said, I suppose you swallow that shit without thinking also (FratFraud):
[h=1]Kerry: Climate Change 'World's Most Fearsome Weapon of Mass Destruction'[/h]
[h=2]Secretary of State John Kerry told Indonesians on Sunday that global warming is now "perhaps the world's most fearsome weapon of mass destruction."[/h]
[h=1]Kerry: Climate Change 'World's Most Fearsome Weapon of Mass Destruction'[/h]
[h=2]Secretary of State John Kerry told Indonesians on Sunday that global warming is now "perhaps the world's most fearsome weapon of mass destruction."[/h]
Oh, look, the troll got caught lying again:
Approximately 5% of the respondents were climate scientists, and 8.5% of the respondents indicated that indicated that more than 50% of their peer-reviewed publications in the past 5 years have been on the subject of climate change
Note: the troll does not even understand that what the troll wrote is not what the survey said.
Judith Curry, a climatologist who heads the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. She was involved in the third IPCC assessment, which was published in 2001. But now she accuses the organization of intellectual arrogance and bias.
"All other things being equal, adding more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere will have a warming effect on the planet," Curry said. "However, all things are never equal, and what we are seeing is natural climate variability dominating over human impact."
Curry isn't the only one to suggest flaws in established climate models. IPCC vice chair Francis Zwiers, director of the Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium at the University of Victoria in Canada, co-wrote a paper published in this month's Nature Climate Change that said climate models had "significantly" overestimated global warming over the last 20 years — and especially for the last 15 years, which coincides with the onset of the hiatus.
=============
You're an idiot who can't even accurately quote a link you cited.
Of course there isn't a single person reading who is surprised.
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus
