That's exactly what happened - time and reality began to leave this BS 'theory' in the dust, so to compensate the ecofascists came up with that laughable bogus "97% survey" - as if opinion(s) have anything to do with the world 'warming' or not.
Remember, we're talking about a multi-billion dollar industry. If the earth is 'cooling' all those lucrative govt grants dry up and people lose interest.
Fearmongering is their last gasp:
That's exactly what happened - time and reality began to leave this BS 'theory' in the dust, so to compensate the ecofascists came up with that laughable bogus "97% survey" - as if opinion(s) have anything to do with the world 'warming' or not.
Remember, we're talking about a multi-billion dollar industry. If the earth is 'cooling' all those lucrative govt grants will dry up.
"Surveys" are their last gasp!
Joe, there are people who still deny the holocaust happened.
I recently watched Kitchen Nightmare, this episode to be exact
and AK is the girl who owns the restaurant and we are Chef Ramsey. Forward to the 23:00 mark and watch for a couple minutes. They are failing and losing tons of money so they ask Chef Ramsey to help. Then whatever he says, she get defensive and refuses to listen. You just watch it and shake your head. Sounds familiar. Very.
over and over. selective memory.
post #339 ....
Morano argued that the number of research papers during this time period alone isn’t a compelling factor, even if the numbers had been accurate. According to Morano, since global warming is the “state sponsored science of the day,” many scientists will incorporate mention of it into otherwise unrelated studies, in order to qualify for grants
“and to this day, it continues to win me the enmity of those who have conflated a problem of science and society with partisan politics.”
The programme makes a number of assertions arguing that the integrity of climate research has been compromised by financial, ideological and political interests:
- Increased funding of climate science. According to the film, there has been an increase in funds available for any research related to global warming "and it is now one of the best funded areas of science."
- Increased availability of funding for global warming research. The film asserts that scientists seeking a research grant award have a much more likely chance of successfully obtaining funding if the grant is linked to global warming research.
- Influence of vested interests. The programme argues that vested interests have a bigger impact on the proponents (rather than the detractors) of arguments supporting the occurrence of man-made global warming because hundreds of thousands of jobs in science, media, and government have been created and are subsidised as a result.
- Suppression of dissenting views. According to the programme, scientists who speak out (against the view that global warming is man-made) risk persecution, death threats, loss of funding, personal attacks, and damage to their reputations.
- Role of ideology. The film proposes that some supporters of the finding that global warming is man-made do so because it supports their emotional and ideological beliefs against capitalism, economic development, globalisation, industrialisation, and the United States.
- Role of politics. The programme asserts that the view that global warming is man-made was promoted by the British Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher as a means of promoting nuclear power and reducing the impact of strike action in the state-owned coal industry by the National Union of Mineworkers.
- Role of industry. The film argues that the assertion that global warming denialists are funded by private industry (such as oil, gas, and coal industries) are false and have no basis in fact.
debunks everything you still believe to me true.
None of that debunks anything I'm saying. Everything you guys are trying to do is attack the scientists and label them as government. As if the entire world of climatologists are controlled in a conspiracy and the retard bar has it all figured out, lol. The fact you think that "debunks" global warming is embarrassing. Get a hold of yourself man.
Human‐Induced Climate Change Requires Urgent Action
Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years.
Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes.
Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric
concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat‐trapping greenhouse gases have increased
sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase.
Human‐caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed
global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because
natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide)
from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate
system for millennia.
Extensive, independent observations confirm the reality of global warming. These
observations show large‐scale increases in air and sea temperatures, sea level, and
atmospheric water vapor; they document decreases in the extent of mountain glaciers,
snow cover, permafrost, and Arctic sea ice. These changes are broadly consistent with longunderstood
physics and predictions of how the climate system is expected to respond to
human‐caused increases in greenhouse gases. The changes are inconsistent with
explanations of climate change that rely on known natural influences.
Climate models predict that global temperatures will continue to rise, with the amount of
warming primarily determined by the level of emissions. Higher emissions of greenhouse
gases will lead to larger warming, and greater risks to society and ecosystems. Some
additional warming is unavoidable due to past emissions.
Climate change is not expected to be uniform over space or time. Deforestation,
urbanization, and particulate pollution can have complex geographical, seasonal, and
longer‐term effects on temperature, precipitation, and cloud properties. In addition,
human‐induced climate change may alter atmospheric circulation, dislocating historical
patterns of natural variability and storminess.
http://sciencepolicy.agu.org/files/2013/07/AGU-Climate-Change-Position-Statement_August-2013.pdf
Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years.
Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes.
Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric
concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat‐trapping greenhouse gases have increased
sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase.
Human‐caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed
global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because
natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide)
from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate
system for millennia.
Extensive, independent observations confirm the reality of global warming. These
observations show large‐scale increases in air and sea temperatures, sea level, and
atmospheric water vapor; they document decreases in the extent of mountain glaciers,
snow cover, permafrost, and Arctic sea ice. These changes are broadly consistent with longunderstood
physics and predictions of how the climate system is expected to respond to
human‐caused increases in greenhouse gases. The changes are inconsistent with
explanations of climate change that rely on known natural influences.
Climate models predict that global temperatures will continue to rise, with the amount of
warming primarily determined by the level of emissions. Higher emissions of greenhouse
gases will lead to larger warming, and greater risks to society and ecosystems. Some
additional warming is unavoidable due to past emissions.
Climate change is not expected to be uniform over space or time. Deforestation,
urbanization, and particulate pollution can have complex geographical, seasonal, and
longer‐term effects on temperature, precipitation, and cloud properties. In addition,
human‐induced climate change may alter atmospheric circulation, dislocating historical
patterns of natural variability and storminess.
http://sciencepolicy.agu.org/files/2013/07/AGU-Climate-Change-Position-Statement_August-2013.pdf
Actually no. There are two studies, one from 2009, Duran... and one from 2013, Cook. That both show 97% of climatologists who write peer reviewed research papers on climatology agree that global warming exists.
It's not even close. It's a world wide fact to the educated. It's a conspiracy to the retard bar... aka Conservatives.
There's nothing for me to be wrong about. I have no clue whether global warming is real or not because I'm not a climatologist nor do I have any clue how they conduct their research or come to their conclusions. All I'm saying is 97% of the climatologists who do study this say it is real. Not sure what else you want me to say. I'm not going to be convinced by a Youtube video or any of you guys trying to be armchair scientists, lol. Or .com blogs. Get real scientific consensus that Global Warming is not true and I will agree with it. Until then, I will not even remotely think the retard bar has a clue what they are saying. People like you, Sheriff Joe, and Acebb are bottom of the barrel people. Start showing some real science literature that is accepted by the scientific community if you want me to believe it.
