"Global Warming is rubbish"

Search

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Let's do a little simple Chemistry, and figure out the molecular mass of the different atmospheric constituents. For this we go to the Periodic Table of the Elements, and find the atomic mass of Nitrogen, Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen. Let's forget about Argon, which is about 0.9% of the atmosphere, because it's supposed to be CO2 that's the evil stuff. To the nearest round number, Carbon = 12, Nitrogen = 14, Oxygen = 16, and lowly Hydrogen = 1. That's based on the number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus of the atom. The Periodic Table will give a slightly different number, because of that binding energy ( which is a mass equivalent ) we talked about earlier.

So, what's the approximate molecular mass of the different gasses? That's simple addition:



Water (H2O)
1 +1+16 = 18 amu

Nitrogen (N2)
14 + 14 = 28 amu

Oxygen (O2)
16 + 16 = 32 amu

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
12 + 16 + 16 = 44 amu


Remember, we're rounding off to the nearest whole number, and amu means Atomic Mass Units.

Do you see something significant? Think like a scientist. Yes, CO2 is by far the heaviest of the major constituents, and the law of gravity applies to it as well. It sinks to the ground.. in fact, into the ground, and into the oceans, as well, because CO2 is very water-soluble and that's what puts the fizz in Ginger Ale.

This doesn't happen overnight. In fact, the winds and convection currents and such keep the air stirred up constantly, so it may take 100-150 years for the CO2 you are exhaling right now to make it back into mother earth, where most of it is currently locked up.




Now our puzzle is complete, and we can visualize the whole thing.

1. The sun heats the earth, repository of most of the CO2 on the planet.

2. Some stored CO2 comes out by a process known as outgassing ( from the soil ) and the champagne effect ( from the oceans ). The oceans are by far the largest source.

3. Sloppy "scientists" see the warming, and the CO2, but overlook the changes in the sun, don't see the fine differences in timing... and proceed to blame the increasing temperature on CO2 and mankind as the culprit in a classic knee-jerk reaction.


Funny, any 1st Grader would have told us that if we had asked them "What makes the earth warm, Susie?" Nobody ever said science had to be "hard". You can demonstrate this with a simple kitchen experiment. Pour a glass of ginger ale, sit it on the table, and see how long it takes to go "flat" at room temperature. Now pour an equal glass into a pan and put it on the stove on low heat, then time how long it takes to go flat. That's your homework experiment - to demonstrate that extra heat really releases CO2 a lot faster :)>

Our satellites are pretty good at measuring overall ocean temperatures from afar, and CO2 measurements are being taken daily around the globe. The best results we have been able to turn up so far is that measurable CO2 increases appear about 9 months after an upswing in ocean temperatures. The data is messed up a bit every time a volcano decides to blow its top, because that's the mother of CO2 producers, bar none. And a buffalo emits about the same amount of methane (CH4) as driving your automobile about 8,000 miles - which can combine with O2 in a highly exothermic reaction ( gives off heat ) to produce CO2 and H2O as end products.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Now he's just pasting random shit he finds on the Internet, lol. You guys are a clown show.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Nope... its all from that one article debunking the "Man-Made" theory (which I know you wont read, cause when you are proven wrong, you somehow assume your head will explode)

http://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/global-warming-01.html

So that one op-ed piece that "debunks" Man-Made global warming is all you need to believe it doesn't exist? Interesting, lol. Well I can post about 1000 research papers, articles, op-ed pieces, etc that prove it does exist. So I guess it comes down to who you want to believe.

Believe a random blog on the Internet, or believe the entire world of climate scientists who say otherwise? I'll believe the climate scientists.

This is like that Loose Change 9/11 shit. Just really random logical fallacies.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
So that one op-ed piece that "debunks" Man-Made global warming is all you need to believe it doesn't exist? Interesting, lol. Well I can post about 1000 research papers, articles, op-ed pieces, etc that prove it does exist. So I guess it comes down to who you want to believe.

Believe a random blog on the Internet, or believe the entire world of climate scientists who say otherwise? I'll believe the climate scientists.

This is like that Loose Change 9/11 shit. Just really random logical fallacies.

There are also thousands of articles and scientists who debunk the "man-made" theory as well.

Why do you assume there is only 1 article and 0 scientists who don't believe in the "man-made" theory?
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,426
Tokens
So that one op-ed piece that "debunks" Man-Made global warming is all you need to believe it doesn't exist? Interesting, lol. Well I can post about 1000 research papers, articles, op-ed pieces, etc that prove it does exist. So I guess it comes down to who you want to believe.

Believe a random blog on the Internet, or believe the entire world of climate scientists who say otherwise? I'll believe the climate scientists.

This is like that Loose Change 9/11 shit. Just really random logical fallacies.

The thousands of Climategate emails revealed what most of us already knew - the whole sham is nothing but a political agenda.

You really are very dumb and uneducated, lol.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
The "ENTIRE WORLD" of climate scientists who say its real???

What about these guys (just to name a few)... they don't live on earth, so they cant be considered as part of the "Entire world of climate scientists"?

Judith Curry, climatologist and chair of the school of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology[16]
Freeman Dyson, professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society [17]
Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences[18][19][20]
Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999–2003).[21]
Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow ANU[22]
Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.[23]
Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London[24]
Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute [25]
Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a doctorate in chemistry[26]
Khabibullo Abdusamatov, mathematician and astronomer at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences[28]
Sallie Baliunas, astronomer, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[29][30]
Tim Ball, professor emeritus of geography at the University of Winnipeg[31]
Robert M. Carter, former head of the school of earth sciences at James Cook University[32]
Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[33]
Chris de Freitas, associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland[34]
David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester[35]
Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University[36]
William M. Gray, professor emeritus and head of the Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University[37]
William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy, Princeton University[38]
Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo[39]
Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.[40]
William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology[41]
David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware[42]
Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[43]
Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.[44][45]
Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of Mining Geology, the University of Adelaide.[46]
Arthur B. Robinson, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego[47]
Murry Salby, former chair of climate at Macquarie University[48]
Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University[49][50]
Tom Segalstad, head of the Geology Museum at the University of Oslo[51]
Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia[52][53][54]
Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[55]
Roy Spencer, principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville[56]
Henrik Svensmark, Danish National Space Center[57]
George H. Taylor, former director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University[58]
Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa[59]
Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.[60]
Claude Allègre, politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).[61]
Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.[62]
John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.[63][64]
Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.[65]
David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.[66]
Ivar Giaever, professor emeritus of physics at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.[67]
Vincent R. Gray, New Zealander physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes[68]
Keith Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change[69]
Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.[70]
Craig D. Idso, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change [71]
Sherwood Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation Laboratory, and adjunct professor, Arizona State University[72]
Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired research professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia[73]
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
The thousands of Climategate emails revealed what most of us already knew - the whole sham is nothing but a political agenda.

You really are very dumb and uneducated, lol.

Ahhhh, so there is a world wide conspiracy by scientists to make up climate change. Got it. Sounds logical.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,426
Tokens
Ahhhh, so there is a world wide conspiracy by scientists to make up climate change. Got it. Sounds logical.

It's factual. The emails exposed the entire scam.

That's why nobody around the world except Obot loons like you care about global warming anymore.

The radicals politicized science, and science lost.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
(Scientific Organizations That Hold the Position That Climate Change Has Been Caused by Human Action)


  1. Academia Chilena de Ciencias, Chile
  2. Academia das Ciencias de Lisboa, Portugal
  3. Academia de Ciencias de la República Dominicana
  4. Academia de Ciencias Físicas, Matemáticas y Naturales de Venezuela
  5. Academia de Ciencias Medicas, Fisicas y Naturales de Guatemala
  6. Academia Mexicana de Ciencias,Mexico
  7. Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Bolivia
  8. Academia Nacional de Ciencias del Peru
  9. Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
  10. Académie des Sciences, France
  11. Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada
  12. Academy of Athens
  13. Academy of Science of Mozambique
  14. Academy of Science of South Africa
  15. Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS)
  16. Academy of Sciences Malaysia
  17. Academy of Sciences of Moldova
  18. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
  19. Academy of Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran
  20. Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt
  21. Academy of the Royal Society of New Zealand
  22. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Italy
  23. Africa Centre for Climate and Earth Systems Science
  24. African Academy of Sciences
  25. Albanian Academy of Sciences
  26. Amazon Environmental Research Institute
  27. American Academy of Pediatrics
  28. American Anthropological Association
  29. American Association for the Advancement of Science
  30. American Association of State Climatologists (AASC)
  31. American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
  32. American Astronomical Society
  33. American Chemical Society
  34. American College of Preventive Medicine
  35. American Fisheries Society
  36. American Geophysical Union
  37. American Institute of Biological Sciences
  38. American Institute of Physics
  39. American Meteorological Society
  40. American Physical Society
  41. American Public Health Association
  42. American Quaternary Association
  43. American Society for Microbiology
  44. American Society of Agronomy
  45. American Society of Civil Engineers
  46. American Society of Plant Biologists
  47. American Statistical Association
  48. Association of Ecosystem Research Centers
  49. Australian Academy of Science
  50. Australian Bureau of Meteorology
  51. Australian Coral Reef Society
  52. Australian Institute of Marine Science
  53. Australian Institute of Physics
  54. Australian Marine Sciences Association
  55. Australian Medical Association
  56. Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
  57. Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
  58. Botanical Society of America
  59. Brazilian Academy of Sciences
  60. British Antarctic Survey
  61. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  62. California Academy of Sciences
  63. Cameroon Academy of Sciences
  64. Canadian Association of Physicists
  65. Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
  66. Canadian Geophysical Union
  67. Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
  68. Canadian Society of Soil Science
  69. Canadian Society of Zoologists
  70. Caribbean Academy of Sciences views
  71. Center for International Forestry Research
  72. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  73. Colombian Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences
  74. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) (Australia)
  75. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
  76. Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences
  77. Crop Science Society of America
  78. Cuban Academy of Sciences
  79. Delegation of the Finnish Academies of Science and Letters
  80. Ecological Society of America
  81. Ecological Society of Australia
  82. Environmental Protection Agency
  83. European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  84. European Federation of Geologists
  85. European Geosciences Union
  86. European Physical Society
  87. European Science Foundation
  88. Federation of American Scientists
  89. French Academy of Sciences
  90. Geological Society of America
  91. Geological Society of Australia
  92. Geological Society of London
  93. Georgian Academy of Sciences
  94. German Academy of Natural Scientists Leopoldina
  95. Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences
  96. Indian National Science Academy
  97. Indonesian Academy of Sciences
  98. Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management
  99. Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology
  100. Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand
  101. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, UK
  102. InterAcademy Council
  103. International Alliance of Research Universities
  104. International Arctic Science Committee
  105. International Association for Great Lakes Research
  106. International Council for Science
  107. International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences
  108. International Research Institute for Climate and Society
  109. International Union for Quaternary Research
  110. International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
  111. International Union of Pure and Applied Physics
  112. Islamic World Academy of Sciences
  113. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities
  114. Kenya National Academy of Sciences
  115. Korean Academy of Science and Technology
  116. Kosovo Academy of Sciences and Arts
  117. l'Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
  118. Latin American Academy of Sciences
  119. Latvian Academy of Sciences
  120. Lithuanian Academy of Sciences
  121. Madagascar National Academy of Arts, Letters, and Sciences
  122. Mauritius Academy of Science and Technology
  123. Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts
  124. National Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, Argentina
  125. National Academy of Sciences of Armenia
  126. National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic
  127. National Academy of Sciences, Sri Lanka
  128. National Academy of Sciences, United States of America
  129. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  130. National Association of Geoscience Teachers
  131. National Association of State Foresters
  132. National Center for Atmospheric Research
  133. National Council of Engineers Australia
  134. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, New Zealand
  135. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  136. National Research Council
  137. National Science Foundation
  138. Natural England
  139. Natural Environment Research Council, UK
  140. Natural Science Collections Alliance
  141. Network of African Science Academies
  142. New York Academy of Sciences
  143. Nicaraguan Academy of Sciences
  144. Nigerian Academy of Sciences
  145. Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters
  146. Oklahoma Climatological Survey
  147. Organization of Biological Field Stations
  148. Pakistan Academy of Sciences
  149. Palestine Academy for Science and Technology
  150. Pew Center on Global Climate Change
  151. Polish Academy of Sciences
  152. Romanian Academy
  153. Royal Academies for Science and the Arts of Belgium
  154. Royal Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences of Spain
  155. Royal Astronomical Society, UK
  156. Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters
  157. Royal Irish Academy
  158. Royal Meteorological Society (UK)
  159. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  160. Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
  161. Royal Scientific Society of Jordan
  162. Royal Society of Canada
  163. Royal Society of Chemistry, UK
  164. Royal Society of the United Kingdom
  165. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  166. Russian Academy of Sciences
  167. Science and Technology, Australia
  168. Science Council of Japan
  169. Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
  170. Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics
  171. Scripps Institution of Oceanography
  172. Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
  173. Slovak Academy of Sciences
  174. Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
  175. Society for Ecological Restoration International
  176. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
  177. Society of American Foresters
  178. Society of Biology (UK)
  179. Society of Systematic Biologists
  180. Soil Science Society of America
  181. Sudan Academy of Sciences
  182. Sudanese National Academy of Science
  183. Tanzania Academy of Sciences
  184. The Wildlife Society (international)
  185. Turkish Academy of Sciences
  186. Uganda National Academy of Sciences
  187. Union of German Academies of Sciences and Humanities
  188. United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  189. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
  190. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
  191. World Association of Zoos and Aquariums
  192. World Federation of Public Health Associations
  193. World Forestry Congress
  194. World Health Organization
  195. World Meteorological Organization
  196. Zambia Academy of Sciences
  197. Zimbabwe Academy of Sciences
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
  • [h=4]Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations[/h] "Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2


  • AAAS-emblem-with-canvas-border.jpg

    [h=4]American Association for the Advancement of Science[/h] "The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3


  • ACS-emblem-with-canvass-border.jpg

    [h=4]American Chemical Society[/h] "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4


  • AGU-emblem-with-canvas-border.jpg

    [h=4]American Geophysical Union[/h] "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5


  • AMA-emblem-with-canvas-border.jpg

    [h=4]American Medical Association[/h] "Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2013)6


  • AMS-emblem-with-canvass-border_133x75.jpg

    [h=4]American Meteorological Society[/h] "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7


  • APS-emblem-with-canvass-border.jpg

    [h=4]American Physical Society[/h] "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8


  • GSA-emblem-with-canvass-border.jpg

    [h=4]The Geological Society of America[/h] "The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9

 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
AK, your claim to fame is academia. I’m sure you’ve read many books. But you should have stopped after…

Book24.JPG
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,426
Tokens
AK, your claim to fame is academia. I’m sure you’ve read many books. But you should have stopped after…

Ah yes, academia...

Historically most of the revolutions in science occurred due to a handful of high IQ highly psychotic individuals who were ridiculed and/or hated by their peers. Many geniuses nowadays wouldn't be able to pass this idiotic unscientific process known as peer review.

Back in the day someone would make an observation and report them and the output would either be duplicated or not - the scientific method. Today a committee of biased self-interested peers with agendas tell you what you should see. If it's not politically correct, it's rejected.

Peer review is a fundamentally flawed, corrupt and unscientific process.

What passes for "scientific research" & How computer-generated fake papers are flooding academia

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=984607


Bring back the scientific method and scrap this subjective peer review garbage.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Ah yes, academia...

Historically most of the revolutions in science occurred due to a handful of high IQ highly psychotic individuals who were ridiculed and/or hated by their peers. Many geniuses nowadays wouldn't be able to pass this idiotic unscientific process known as peer review.

Back in the day someone would make an observation and report them and the output would either be duplicated or not - the scientific method. Today a committee of biased self-interested peers with agendas tell you what you should see. If it's not politically correct, it's rejected.

Peer review is a fundamentally flawed, corrupt and unscientific process.

What passes for "scientific research" & How computer-generated fake papers are flooding academia

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=984607


Bring back the scientific method and scrap this subjective peer review garbage.

You are the big blue bar under "No". Aka the General Public, Aka Retarded Conservatives. That's exactly where you belong, lol.

EOS_public_scientific_opinion.png
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,426
Tokens
You are the big blue bar under "No". Aka the General Public, Aka Retarded Conservatives. That's exactly where you belong, lol.

It is very funny watching a guy who doesn't even have a formal degree worshipping the world of academia, lol.

You are a poseur who's incredibly dumb and uneducated, lol.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
It is very funny watching a guy who doesn't even have a formal degree worshipping the world of academia, lol.

You are a poseur who's incredibly dumb and uneducated, lol.

Huge difference between you and I. I am smart and think like smart people, which is why I'm on the "Yes" side, with all the other smart people. You are dumb and think like a retard, which is why you are part of the big blue bar with the General Public on the "No" side. The graph probably would look the same if you asked if you believe Obama was born in Hawaii... lol. Smart people would say yes, crazy obsessed birther freaks would say No.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,426
Tokens
At least you're now admitting you don't have a formal education. In the retardo world of 'akphidelt' I suppose that's a start.

And no, you're not remotely intelligent enough to discern good information from bad - everyone can see that. That's why you're an Obot sheep who blindly follows people you THINK are 'smart' while using this forum to project your insecurities like telling everyone how 'dumb' they are, lol.

You think we all don't see through your charade, fratclown?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,989
Messages
13,575,872
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com