*****G-Man's College Plays. Sept 3rd. Sunday-Monday*****

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,778
Tokens

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
6,575
Tokens
Who are the moderators these days? Can we not just delete this ridiculous display from BOTH of these guys?

WTF!
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,778
Tokens

F me, F U
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
3,378
Tokens
Who are the moderators these days? Can we not just delete this ridiculous display from BOTH of these guys?

WTF!
If you’ve paid attention just a little it appears to be a free for all. Not sure why guys don’t want each other to all win. This isn’t head to head…right? Books are the foes.

whoever runs this asylum certainly doesn’t police or have Mods doing a damn thing.
Sorry to clutter your thread up GMan.

like your thoughts on Duke. I’ve got em too.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,778
Tokens
Sun-Mon, 5-0 +2,400.00
ML Cashed as predicted. But not counted here.


Season 13-11. +840.00
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,778
Tokens

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
9,238
Tokens
ML Cashed as predicted. But not counted here.
You must have predicted Duke winning SU while losing most statistical categories? Great call lol

I was 4-0 tonight. I bet Duke at 4 different lines.
 

MLB

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
2,544
Tokens
G-Man, nice analysis on Clemson/Duke. You're a must read for CFB.

Although it's sometimes very tough to get through your threads with all the back and forth of other posters and all the arguing that happens.

BOL moving forward........have a great CFB season!
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
7,778
Tokens
You must have predicted Duke winning SU while losing most statistical categories? Great call lol

I was 4-0 tonight. I bet Duke at 4 different lines.
It was the second line written in my write up . Yet because it won as I predicted - you need to continually drop shit in my treads.

Also you make a remark about statistical data? LOL
If that was why you didnt bet them on the ML - then it shows you are using the wrong information to even find a play like the ML?
But you tell me that my source I use for public betting percentages is bad? LOL.
Did you bet Clemson? Maybe thats why you didnt see the ML upset sitting there?

You bash my ML post and cant find it good? Then you dont want to even note the spread win?

You guys are all the same. You all hate when someone wins and you dont...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,932
Messages
13,575,404
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com