Yeah,
Like I wrote up - we had to see what VanDyke was going to do. he was a big improvement. But they ran the ball too much with 46 carries that killed clock and yards per play.
The Wisky defense was napping a bit
But in 1st downs and total yardage the Badgers should have done more on both sides of the ball.
Next game Wisconsin should get the advantage against the spread.
WMU will get too much attention, for keeping the score close.
No Complains on Oklahoma?
5-1 so far with lines on game day thru Friday..
4-1-1. posted.
USC +4 over LSU . 4 units
Under 67. 4 units
Lots to consider here. Both teams lost their starting QB's and both were extremely good with passer ratings of over 170 and 192 last season.
This is important today, because Both teams will never achieve the average scoring per game as a year ago when they were scoring 42 and 46 pts per game.
The main reason the scoring was high, was because they had overwhelming percentages on 1st downs by passing the ball.
Thats going to diminish the success in yards passing per attempt this year which makes the field longer per play.
Neither team was good defensively last year - but now both are facing much lower scoring potentials with each team today.
Im with USC because they returned 9 defensive starters and that where the advantage is in this game today.
Last time they did that 4 years ago - they allowed only 26 pts per game.
Now last note; Road games are lower scoring and Both teams are on the road!
Remember the Ga Tech game last Saturday...
Under 67. 4 units
Lots to consider here. Both teams lost their starting QB's and both were extremely good with passer ratings of over 170 and 192 last season.
This is important today, because Both teams will never achieve the average scoring per game as a year ago when they were scoring 42 and 46 pts per game.
The main reason the scoring was high, was because they had overwhelming percentages on 1st downs by passing the ball.
Thats going to diminish the success in yards passing per attempt this year which makes the field longer per play.
Neither team was good defensively last year - but now both are facing much lower scoring potentials with each team today.
Im with USC because they returned 9 defensive starters and that where the advantage is in this game today.
Last time they did that 4 years ago - they allowed only 26 pts per game.
Now last note; Road games are lower scoring and Both teams are on the road!
Remember the Ga Tech game last Saturday...
If you are comparing this game to last week's Ga Tech game, you should take note that Ga Tech had a veteran OLine.....similar to what LSU brings to tonight's game. All five starters returned as well as both running backs and both tight ends.
Youre a rookie (likely an alias) trolling my thread. If you liked LSU so much why didnt you post it in your own thread. Bullshit!
Stay out of my threads.
You should have known that the starting QB's were both replaced from LY. The advantage WAS on the So/Cal defense. That was the difference in the game for BOTH PLAYS withe the UNDER!
Your LSU offense managed just 117 yds rushing which was well below the team that they were last year, who averaged 205 yds per game.
When a team returns 9 starters on defense, they usually allow less points/gm than the previous year.
I explained that in the write up.
The Big Scoring teams they were last year - were what usually happens when you lose NFL grade QB's/ The scoring production was HALF today, from last year by BOTH teams.
Just LIKE FSU!!!
So NO! I was correct in why this game was like the FSU/GT game last week. And the result was the same. The Under Dog won SU and it happened again here iwith USC...
I responded to you, because no one ever stops back in to say there were wrong when posting in some else's treads.
YOU DID IT ON NOTHER GAME BUT I LET IT GO when you told me Wisconsin was the wrong side AFTER the game lost,. Not cool.
I did tell you what I thought about the game . But didnt chime about your negativity trolling towards me then .
I never went into your posts and SAID "Man you were wrong" and bumped a thread. You even instigated another asshole (Jackleg) to do it . Trolls...
You've been here since 2004? and you troll now? WOW!
BOL in the future.
Hey what the fuck asshole?
it’s a gambling forum where people are intended to share ideas. I didn’t post anything insulting or inflammatory…..just shared an opinion on a thread. now that I know you want to post without any interaction, I’ll stay out of your threads. But wow….what a cunt.
it’s a gambling forum where people are intended to share ideas. I didn’t post anything insulting or inflammatory…..just shared an opinion on a thread. now that I know you want to post without any interaction, I’ll stay out of your threads. But wow….what a cunt.
I am neither a rookie nor a troll.
I don't think I know a single person on this forum either personally, professionally, or from the internet world. I was actually agreeing with your play, which I liked. I just happened to respond to LSUpete, who I felt was also agreeing with your play, because I liked his note of the comparable OL experience. I was actually trying to be friendly to the both of you. For the record, I did post the play in my own thread and had the same play as you, Under 67. You made note of 9 returning starters for USC on D while I made note of the change in DC's and the fact that I felt the USC defense could be the most improved individual unit in the country. Same apple, peeled a different way.
I don't really respond too much or post a lot but thought it would be fun to engage a little during football season because I enjoy college football so much. I guess not. The internet is a weird place. If you prefer to make enemies because the angst and presumptive oppression motivates you in some way, OK, but it's not for me. I will stay out of your threads. Congrats on the wins, have a great season.
Was Kentucky game scored only playing 3 quarters with sportsbooks?
Bengals according to what I’ve read should have zero problems with Patriots. My feeling is this game is over before halftime with the Chiefs on deck.
Speaking of Chiefs….. Tough seeing them and for them to lose 1st 2 at home…..
Bengals according to what I’ve read should have zero problems with Patriots. My feeling is this game is over before halftime with the Chiefs on deck.
Speaking of Chiefs….. Tough seeing them and for them to lose 1st 2 at home…..
Yo, I don’t troll, but I did follow you in baseball without posting responses.
Just been biding time and saving money till football.
Maybe it’s because when they were played, and that nothing else was on, but the two games that stick out in my mind are FSU/Georgia Tech and USC/LSU.
I don’t know why I didn’t give you more credit and cred. You nailed all three (I’m including the total for USC). And you had the balls to go with the Georgia Tech moneyline when it’s sideline was 10 1/2.
Congrats on those. I will follow you more. Follow as in copy, join, replicate, duplicate, wager-ate, etc.-ate.
I hope everyone in this forum is respectful and shares in a unity of siblinghood. I would say brotherhood but don’t want to get canceled.
Seriously, I don’t see the usefulness of calling out another’s losing plays and then calling posters names. If everybody did that, this forum will be filled with “you can’t pick worth a shit you fucking loser” posts.
Civili discourse and respectful dissent, along with meaningful praise and accolades when appropriate, is what would bring me back here more, rather than what’s across the street.
We are all in this together to win.
Here’s to a good season for all (except the books).
