This is an interesting point, and the only one that supports the logic behind trying to fade a capper. To me, the fade doesn't have long term sustainability as the capper would change tactics if they routinely fell below 52.7%. Additionally, their clientele would dry up before long. Why bother to produce 47% winners if a coin can get you a true 50%.
You could argue the larger services move the line off the true number so you get value, but the cappers that do move lines have a profitable historical record so the line moves generally sharpen the opening number. Like the majority of plays published here, some of the gambling advice should be equally dismissed.
Sustainable profits can be achieved by doing the work, betting games you have researched, and exercising bankroll discipline.
For what its worth.
You could argue the larger services move the line off the true number so you get value, but the cappers that do move lines have a profitable historical record so the line moves generally sharpen the opening number. Like the majority of plays published here, some of the gambling advice should be equally dismissed.
Sustainable profits can be achieved by doing the work, betting games you have researched, and exercising bankroll discipline.
For what its worth.
