I have a question for you math/statistics people...having taken more than a few levels of both in universities in my day...How do you explain individuals who produce in the 59% to 63% range over say 10+ years in sports wagering? What you need to understand is that "regression to the mean" is an expectation of a mathmatical hypothesis, and does not affect humans the same way it affects the rolling of dice thousands of times.bznofx19 said:do any of you know about a phenomenon called "regression towards the mean"? no way he goes 50-15. I dont think we should fade him either because if he continues at a 60% rate he would be on a 46-19 run. but i wouldnt think of that as being too likely either. I think if Vegas made a line, 43-22 would be more realistic 65 game run that he is about to have.
dont get me wrong, he is on a great run...but it just sounds as if his picks are based too much off of 'whims'.
now that he is in the spotlight and everyone is watching his picks...dont put too much pressure on him to keep winning because the Statistical Gods are about to even things out! and i dont mean that in a harsh, evil way...just rational.
People can get hot and stay hot for years...or ...they can do just the opposite.
There is no mathmatical postulation you can put forth that says with a certainty that he will not go 50-15...or better.