Now that Excedrin headache #101 has subsided from a moron that can't do a basic PPal transaction, let me respond in kind to his nonsensical comments. As most can see, he likes to whipsaw on his comments. He says I'm right about the hedge being no concern of his, and yet he comes right back with the same nonsense. As I stated before, this site has some astute gamblers on it. Most of these people understand shopping spreads and value and any moron would realize that the biggest sportsbook for U.S. Gamblers has Biden at -165 currently (and also had that price yesterday morning...not the local I use but clearly there are lower spreads than what this clown is claiming). I mistakenly thought they were a site sponsor and pasted the odds (hence the page #5 problem). But for those that choose to look, it's the one that starts with a "B" and has a "V" in its name.
So ultimately, this moron got zero benefit from his wager and actually could have done slightly better. His whole game was to try and egg on people, playing off their emotions to secure a Biden -120 wager. Only one person fell for it, but I'm pleased to know after that he got played on his own game and people are actually getting good value out of him now. The fact of the matter is, nowhere could you find Trump at +170...nowhere. And of course, the astute gamblers on this site ate it right up. They clearly wanted to make a wager any way so why not take a +170 instead of the standard +150 that was out there. Sounds pretty smart to me. And it puts a smile on my face knowing a moron now will pay a larger payout than the -120 he was trying to secure if he loses (hence my motivation...don't care one bit about my wager as it's meaningless). Funny how he would get so caught up with a miniscule hedge on my part and not realize the idiocy of what he just did (hell, he probably would have gotten a nice little bonus with the extra 2+ grand of wagers in addition to paying a slightly lower price). But as they say, you can't fix stupid.
So ultimately, this moron got zero benefit from his wager and actually could have done slightly better. His whole game was to try and egg on people, playing off their emotions to secure a Biden -120 wager. Only one person fell for it, but I'm pleased to know after that he got played on his own game and people are actually getting good value out of him now. The fact of the matter is, nowhere could you find Trump at +170...nowhere. And of course, the astute gamblers on this site ate it right up. They clearly wanted to make a wager any way so why not take a +170 instead of the standard +150 that was out there. Sounds pretty smart to me. And it puts a smile on my face knowing a moron now will pay a larger payout than the -120 he was trying to secure if he loses (hence my motivation...don't care one bit about my wager as it's meaningless). Funny how he would get so caught up with a miniscule hedge on my part and not realize the idiocy of what he just did (hell, he probably would have gotten a nice little bonus with the extra 2+ grand of wagers in addition to paying a slightly lower price). But as they say, you can't fix stupid.
If youre talking about Bovada, well, 2 things. #1 they are sponsored here and #2 i was limited to $5 wagers there long ago. After winning 12k on the australian open in 2016 or 2017(whatever year that DJoker beat Murray in the final) And if you have ever been shown the door by Bovada you know they send you a very nice email trying i suppose to inflate your ego(so you don't bad mouth them i suppose) telling you how you are to good for them and they will send you your balance free of charge for whatever method you chose and you are allowed to go over their withdrawal limits for this one time withdrawal.
I think some of you might not understand that me offering you guys +170 is me also getting -170, i am simply removing the juice so its a good wagers for both sides. Also Seymour(bet +120) didn't fall for anything, him and i made that bet months ago.
I have 2 primary accounts Betonline(-175) i have already maxed this wager there and Bookmaker.eu, where you can bet basically whatever you want but i am getting better odds taking wagers here.
Red Eye or BFL, you are more then welcome to add to your bets.
For your hedge. I love advantage gambling and even i am not going through all this for a 5 cent hedge. It's basically $12. I wouldn't call that smart nor would get as upset as you seem to be.
I think some of you might not understand that me offering you guys +170 is me also getting -170, i am simply removing the juice so its a good wagers for both sides. Also Seymour(bet +120) didn't fall for anything, him and i made that bet months ago.
I have 2 primary accounts Betonline(-175) i have already maxed this wager there and Bookmaker.eu, where you can bet basically whatever you want but i am getting better odds taking wagers here.
Red Eye or BFL, you are more then welcome to add to your bets.
For your hedge. I love advantage gambling and even i am not going through all this for a 5 cent hedge. It's basically $12. I wouldn't call that smart nor would get as upset as you seem to be.
Maybe i am different but i haven't accepted a deposit bonus from a book in probably 5 years. Their terms normally suck with the roll overs and the not being able to withdraw for 30 days or more...not to mention what other little nuggets they can stick in their terms.
I enjoy bookmaker.eu and their loyalty program in which you get back a percentage of what you bet. Deposit bonuses are definitely not my thing.
I enjoy bookmaker.eu and their loyalty program in which you get back a percentage of what you bet. Deposit bonuses are definitely not my thing.
Nope they sure aren't. Hence, the page 5 problem this morning and JOH pulling their banner
Yes of course. Let's go with that and throw it in on any sites that have Biden -170 or less. Must suck to have to rely on betting with people on websites and having people hold the money just so you can get a better spread than the books you're limited to.
Nope, I understand that just fine (think Red Eye does also). It was actually the gist of what I said. But you've had a history of comprehension problems so it's not surprising you don't get it.
Yeah, but you weren't trying to secure wagers at -120..see below
More comprehension problems. I don't need to increase my wager. I accomplished what I wanted to do and am having a good laugh. cheersgif
check in here BFL http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1168700
