Federer hasn't lost in 5 years at the Open

Search

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
Andy Murray robbed us of another classic, but I would like to thank him for the easy winner on Roger.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Messages
324
Tokens
remember tiger woods had a lull in his career also, remember when vijah singh was ranked #1 in the world.
 

Self appointed RX World Champion Handicapper
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
15,052
Tokens
he really needs to lose the fall to the court routine after winning . he had 45 minutes to figure out how he would celebrate the win , and still it the same ol' fall down ..
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
he really needs to lose the fall to the court routine after winning . he had 45 minutes to figure out how he would celebrate the win , and still it the same ol' fall down ..

I agree, that is great when a stiff beats a Rafa or Roger, but not when you are Roger and the only suspense was whether he would be able to bagel Murray in the 3rd.
 

Self appointed RX World Champion Handicapper
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
15,052
Tokens
is it me , or is roger's girlfriend getting fatter and fatter ...

what's the deal with her head ? its like a head and a half...
 

New member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
2,400
Tokens
Not cheap at all. It's actually inflated. The line should be Roger -150 at max. Murray is playing MUCH better.

This isn't Roger from 5 years ago or ever from last year so that means nothing to me. Watching the match against Novak he didn't look great even if he won. Roger also hadn't lost at Wimbledon for 5 years, and look how that turned out. Grass is his best surface too.

lol, line was not inflated. The line was a gift. Roger still the G.O.A.T.
 

OTK

A goal without a plan is just a wish.
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
3,536
Tokens
Yes the line was inflated because everyone loves Roger. Murray had been playing MUCH better tennis for the past two months. Everything I said still holds true. I'm glad Roger won because my hedge bet actually won more if Federer won. Murray didn't have it today and got killed. That will happen if you don't bring your best stuff against a top guy like Roger. If Roger didn't bring his game and Andy was playing his best he would have killed Roger too. These are two top 4 players, you have to play your best.

Congrats to Federer. Still a bit behind Nadal, but proved he's still a great player.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
2,400
Tokens
Yes the line was inflated because everyone loves Roger. Murray had been playing MUCH better tennis for the past two months. Everything I said still holds true. I'm glad Roger won because my hedge bet actually won more if Federer won. Murray didn't have it today and got killed. That will happen if you don't bring your best stuff against a top guy like Roger. If Roger didn't bring his game and Andy was playing his best he would have killed Roger too. These are two top 4 players, you have to play your best.

Congrats to Federer. Still a bit behind Nadal, but proved he's still a great player.

You said in another thread "Andy will prob win" lol. What are you smoking? If Roger didn't bring his game, Andy would of won? Thats the dumbest statement I ever heard. Obviously if a player doesnt bring their A game they will lose. The difference is Roger can win without his A game and Andy can't. Yeah hes a bit behind Nadal he only has 13 grand slam titles.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,812
Messages
13,573,553
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com