False Positive awareness is rising , the hoax continues

Search

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
102,034
Tokens


Unlike previous epidemics, in addressing COVID-19 nearly all international health organizations and national health ministries have treated a single positive result from a PCR-based test as confirmation of infection, even in asymptomatic persons without any history of exposure. This is based on a widespread belief that positive results in these tests are highly reliable. However, data on PCR-based tests for similar viruses show that PCR-based testing produces enough false positive results to make positive results highly unreliable over a broad range of real-world scenarios. This has clinical and case management implications, and affects an array of epidemiological statistics, including the asymptomatic ratio, prevalence, and hospitalization and death rates. Steps need to be taken to raise awareness of false positives, reduce their frequency, and mitigate their effects. In the interim, positive results in asymptomatic individuals that haven't been confirmed by a second test should be considered suspect.




In previous epidemics, health authorities voiced concerns that false positive results from PCR- based tests could harm both the individuals tested and the ability of government agencies to assess the outbreak, and they adopted measures to limit the occurrence of false positives. For example, the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limited PCR-based testing to individuals with a high probability of infection (those with symptoms and/or significant exposure) and usually required confirmation of positive results by a second, independent test These warnings and requirements are absent from the same organizations' guidance on SARS-CoV-2 testing.
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
102,034
Tokens
Covid-19: Govt. Narrative Fundamentally FalseBiochemical engineer, Ivor Cummins exposes the official government SAR-CoV-2 narrative as fundamentally false.
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
102,034
Tokens


Unlike previous epidemics, in addressing COVID-19 nearly all international health organizations and national health ministries have treated a single positive result from a PCR-based test as confirmation of infection, even in asymptomatic persons without any history of exposure. This is based on a widespread belief that positive results in these tests are highly reliable. However, data on PCR-based tests for similar viruses show that PCR-based testing produces enough false positive results to make positive results highly unreliable over a broad range of real-world scenarios. This has clinical and case management implications, and affects an array of epidemiological statistics, including the asymptomatic ratio, prevalence, and hospitalization and death rates. Steps need to be taken to raise awareness of false positives, reduce their frequency, and mitigate their effects. In the interim, positive results in asymptomatic individuals that haven't been confirmed by a second test should be considered suspect.




In previous epidemics, health authorities voiced concerns that false positive results from PCR- based tests could harm both the individuals tested and the ability of government agencies to assess the outbreak, and they adopted measures to limit the occurrence of false positives. For example, the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limited PCR-based testing to individuals with a high probability of infection (those with symptoms and/or significant exposure) and usually required confirmation of positive results by a second, independent test These warnings and requirements are absent from the same organizations' guidance on SARS-CoV-2 testing.

State after state are realizing the false positives
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
102,034
Tokens
As if the wheels weren’t falling off the bus already

Common colds 'account for some reported COVID-19 cases'
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
102,034
Tokens
[h=1]Study Shows that More than 90% of Cases Tested COVID-Positive Are Wrongly Diagnosed![/h]
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
102,034
Tokens
#covid19 for dummies
- Lock downs do not work,worsened!
- mask do not help
- Media is making all worse with fake reporting
-
@WHO changes the direction on wearing mask!Think why
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
102,034
Tokens
Dr Fauci Unmasked: A surprise pandemic? You don’t work for 5 past global [DS] Presidents and have a surprise pandemic
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
Public Health Ontario

"PHO Laboratory has detected false positive SARS-CoV-2 results on approximately 20 occasions among over 228,000 specimens tested to date for COVID-19, with ~11,000 specimens testing positive. This represents a false positivity rate of less than 0.01% (specificity of >99.99%), which is well beyond performance targets for a laboratory test, even acknowledging there may be some false positive tests that are not detected.

In general, the positive predictive value of COVID-19 PCR assays is excellent, and approaches 100%. At PHO Laboratory, we know this as we are able to generate viral sequence from samples that are positive provided the viral copy number is not near the lower limit of detection of the assay.

False positive results can occur at various stages of laboratory testing, which can be grouped into the following categories:

1. Pre-analytical errors. These are errors that occur prior to the actual testing being done. These could include mislabelling of samples that result in incorrect results being reported. They may also result from specimen contamination in transport or during aliquoting in the laboratory.
2. Analytical errors. These occur during the actual laboratory testing. These could occur for various reasons such as reagent contamination. Reagents can arrive contaminated from the supplier. To mitigate this, each new batch undergoes a quality assurance check before being put into use. False positive results can also arise from contamination due to pipetting errors, which can be due to human error or defects in automated equipment. Such analytic errors are controlled by having negative and positive controls on each run of the assay, which are reviewed prior to releasing results.
3. Post-analytical errors. This involves result interpretation by the technologist and reporting of results. Incorrect interpretation could lead to a false positive result. Transcription errors could also result in false positive results being generated. Such errors are controlled by having a second technologist review results prior to them being reported out."




https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/time-for-a-partial-lockdown.724913/page-3#post-6814803

 
Joined
Aug 17, 2019
Messages
18,698
Tokens
The U.S. Government last week updated the SURVIVAL RATES (i.e., IF infected) for Covid19:

USA
Ages 0-19: 99.997%
Ages 20-49: 99.98%
Ages 50-69: 99.5%
Ages 70+: 94.6%
Source: CDC

MSM/FAKE NEWS NETWORKS *CRICKETS*

OTHER COUNTRIES RECENTLY UPDATED:
Belgium: 99.944%
Spain: 99.956%
Italy: 99.957%
France: 99.965%
U.K.: 99.972%
Netherlands: 99.975%
Sweden: 99.980%

MSM/FAKE NEWS NETWORKS *CRICKETS*


The only people who continue to think the virus is real or a genuine threat are those who are brain-washed by MSM.

Some refer to these people as "sheeple".

"Sheeple" are people who lack independent thinking.

"Sheeple" believe everything they read and hear in MSM.

LET US ALL PRAY FOR THE "SHEEPLE"!


You can find more facts and truth in my other thread>> http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1155663&page=138
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
The only people who continue to think the virus is real or a genuine threat are those who are brain-washed by MSM.

Your post make some insults & had some alleged stats. It didn't support your statement above. So it's not convincing.

Even if accurate, are you ready to put your life at risk for no reason by acting irresponsibly or encouraging others who could infect & kill you via C-19 to act irresponsibly?

Are you willing to risk your life, if you are 70 years of age or older on an almost 5 in 100 chance you'll die?

Are you willing to risk being hospitalized or put in ICU or suffering long term C-19 negative health effects? Read more about that here:

https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/c-19...vivors.723087/

The following comments are from my post here: http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1166698

Shutdowns were the most effective precaution there was from a cautious health expert perspective. That's why the experts advocated lockdowns. They worked to save millions of lives from death, as well as millions of others from illness, hospitalization, ICU & long term negative health effects. Which would have impacted economies negatively. And led to hospitals being overwhelmed & having to choose between who lives & who dies because they wouldn't have been able to treat many emergency patients on arrival & have been forced to turn many away from timely needed emergency care. Leading to many more deaths.

So you're saying you advocated a Swedish approach "all along" from the beginning of the pandemic? Are you not aware that Sweden has suffered way more infections and deaths relative to their Nordic neighbours with no advantage economically? The Sweden approach has been a failure!

Are you not aware that even apparently healthy young people are dying & suffering long term negative consequences from C-19, in addition to suffering in ICU's from the illness. Which you ignored from my previous post.

"I was infected with coronavirus in March, six months on I’m still unwell

Charlie Russell, 27, is one of an estimated 600,000 people with post-Covid illness, a condition that may give an insight into ME"

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...m-still-unwell

More on the long term negative effects of C-19 infection here:

https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/c-19...vivors.723087/

As for the shutdowns, what is obviously clear is they have had many benefits:

1) serious vehicular accidents & deaths are way way down
2) flu deaths & serious complications have decreased tremendously
3) C-19 ill health & deaths are far less due to the lockdowns
4) likewise probably other communicable diseases (e.g. tuberculosis, HIV) have been greatly reduced by the extreme safety measures in place
5) street crimes have probably been highly reduced.
6) families have been able to spend more time together enjoying each others company while free from the slavery of that 4 letter word "work" that the vast majority hate. Giving more time for quality of life activities like sex & various entertainments.
7) abortions (child murder) are probably down.

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread...1#post13211637

Many kids & young people's lives have already been saved due to the worldwide lockdowns.

Because motor vehicle accident deaths are the #1 leading worldwide cause of death in such.

"Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for U.S. teens."

https://www.google.com/search?q=lead...hrome&ie=UTF-8

"Each year, 1.35 million people are killed on roadways around the world.4

"...Road traffic injuries are estimated to be the eighth leading cause of death globally for all age groups and the leading cause of death for children and young people 5–29 years of age. More people now die in road traffic crashes than from HIV/AIDS.4"

https://www.cdc.gov/injury/features/...nd%20cyclists.

As for "trillions in damage", there would have been huge economic damage with or without the shutdowns. Without shutdowns millions more people get ill, hospitalized, suffer long term ill health & death leading to employees being absent from work, businesses shutdown anyway, & in many cases for much longer, etc.

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1166698
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
The U.S. Government last week updated the SURVIVAL RATES (i.e., IF infected) for Covid19:

USA
Ages 0-19: 99.997%
Ages 20-49: 99.98%
Ages 50-69: 99.5%
Ages 70+: 94.6%
Source: CDC

So if you're 70+ there is a very real chance of dying from a C-19 infection. Greater than 5% or 5 in 100.

Also if you're 50-69 there is a very real chance of dying from a C-19 infection. Exactly 5 in 1000.

Anyone wanna play some "Russian Roulette". That's a fool's game.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
CDC Covid-19 Survival Rates:

Age 0-19 — 99.997%
Age 20-49 — 99.98%
Age 50-69 — 99.5%
Age 70+ — 94.6%

The 'joke' is on you. Thanks for your worthless amateurish spreadsheets wasting everyone's time.

Same with X-Files and his neverending China virus hysteria...another complete waste of bandwidth.

The U.S. Government last week updated the SURVIVAL RATES (i.e., IF infected) for Covid19:

USA
Ages 0-19: 99.997%
Ages 20-49: 99.98%
Ages 50-69: 99.5%
Ages 70+: 94.6%
Source: CDC

So if you're 70+ there is a very real chance of dying from a C-19 infection. Greater than 5% or 5 in 100.

Also if you're 50-69 there is a very real chance of dying from a C-19 infection. Exactly 5 in 1000.

Anyone wanna play some "Russian Roulette". That's a fool's game.

Wake up.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Russian roulette
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/russian-roulette
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/russian-roulette
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2019
Messages
18,698
Tokens
So if you're 70+ there is a very real chance of dying from a C-19 infection. Greater than 5% or 5 in 100.

Also if you're 50-69 there is a very real chance of dying from a C-19 infection. Exactly 5 in 1000.

Anyone wanna play some "Russian Roulette". That's a fool's game.

Wake up.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Russian roulette
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/russian-roulette
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/russian-roulette


In order to understand the risk you have to be able to do basic math.

Ages 70+: 94.6% or 5.4% or 5.4 out of 100

Ages 50-69: 99.5% or .5% or .5 out of 100

The risk is virtually non-existent for all ages up 70.

The only reason there is risk to ages 70+ is because it was discovered that 99% of those people infected also had at least ONE SERIOUS underlying medical condition while more than 50% of those people had at least THREE SERIOUS underlying medical conditions. This means that 99% of healthy people (no serious underlying medical conditions) over the age of 70 are virtually not at risk either!

Therefore, the ONLY REAL RISK GROUP are those over the age of 70 with at least one serious underlying medical condition!

These are the proven facts, all published by the most respected doctors and institutions in the world and supported by peer-reviewed research, the only credible research that exists.

There is no "roulette" with this virus. The risks are no different than a common cold or the "flu".

Perhaps you should stop buying the fear porn and fake news headlines and start truly understanding the FACTS!

Logical thinking.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
Ages 70+: 94.6% or 5.4% or 5.4 out of 100

Ages 50-69: 99.5% or .5% or .5 out of 100

The risk is virtually non-existent for all ages up 70.

Nonsense.

A 1 in 200 chance of death is not a "virtually non-existent" risk, but a very serious, real and dangerous risk. That's the risk at ages 50-69 based on the stats you posted.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
Therefore, the ONLY REAL RISK GROUP are those over the age of 70 with at least one serious underlying medical condition!

A large percentage of people at that age in the USA have at least "one serious underlying medical condition"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"According to research done by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, it is estimated that around 40% of Americans are considered obese..."

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...hUKEwjK_Pap2YbsAhVWtZ4KHecnCgIQ4dUDCA0&uact=5

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html

With older people it is even higher than 40%!

Wake up!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,459
Messages
13,533,621
Members
100,369
Latest member
collectionsinpi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com