Yeah, this is why her $50 whatever million is such a joke.
How do you think this guy feels ? Prob lucky he didn't get killed in prison. I'm sure his feeling's are hurt too ?
This is why the legal system is so fucked up. Funny thing is .. this will never end. Can't wait to hear the next D List Celebrate to cash in.
There is no way to justify a 50 plus million dollar judgement for this. Stop trying to argue in her favor.
It's just ridiculous. There is no legitimate argument.
"Her feelings are hurt'... "She was exposed".. "No one has ever seen her nude" (LOL)
Crazy that anyone could possibly make a case for her.
It's just ridiculous. There is no legitimate argument.
"Her feelings are hurt'... "She was exposed".. "No one has ever seen her nude" (LOL)
Crazy that anyone could possibly make a case for her.
Correct
Erin Andrews won a spectacular victory in her peephole lawsuit, but her $55 million verdict is almost certainly going to get slashed many times over.
Of the $55 million, she will never see a penny from pervert Michael Barrett, who is on the hook for $28 million. Marriott is responsible for the remaining $27 million.
Marriott will almost certainly appeal the verdict, which then opens the door to settlement. There are compelling reasons why Erin might want to settle. It's a huge judgment when you consider there's no physical injury ... just emotional distress. An appeals court could overturn the verdict on grounds it's simply excessive. It's a crapshoot to go forward with an appeal ... for both sides.
The legal experts we've spoken with all say the likelihood is the case will settle ... for somewhere around $20 million on Marriott's part.
Now the lawyers' fees. In lawsuits where a case actually goes to trial, lawyers typically get around 40% of therecoverable judgment. So, if Erin settles with Marriott for $20 million, the lawyers would get $8 million, leaving her with $12 million. And Erin's responsible for costs in preparing the case, which we're told could approach $1 million, leaving her with $11 million.
Now the bad news. In cases where someone wins an award for emotional distress without any physical injuries, the award is taxable. So the $11 million becomes more like $6 million.
She`s not a Kardashian.....She don`t need the publicity.....She`s already well known.
Is this kind of like if I disagree with you.... I must fuck my sister, have 2 teeth, be a redneck, etc?
I understand the judgement. I just think it is nonsensical bullshit. Just like I understand DUI's. Just a moneymaking scam.
55 million? How do you justify that?
If you were to find him guilty and then give her 1K while she has over 100K in legal fees. That would be just punishment. The whole thing is BS. Everyone can see it.
Who is everyone? You and a few other woman haters at RX? Hell, you already told us you tea bagged a passed out girl in high school and Peyton manning putting his nuts on a girls head is " something that everyone does". You obviously don't know women very well.....this kind of stuff had lasting effects and the scumbag who taped her and the hotel both deserve exactly what they got.
Youre lying again. Multiple people have asked you to stop making things up. Many blacks resist because they feel being detained by police is dangerous for them.....we have seen in recent years, video evidence confirms this. You've only seen black people on tv so you wouldn't know what they think.
Not a surprise that you and Vlad share same thoughts.
I understand the point she's trying to make. It's not like she's a porn star that was filmed without her knowledge. Just because she's in the spotlight, that doesn't mean she deserves to be filmed without her permission.
My only thought is that the award was excessive. Prisoners who are wrongly jailed for years and years don't get much, and I'd argue the hell they go through for all those years spent in prison is much worse than what she's gone through.
I can't and won't fault her though, she followed the rules of the law and did what she's legally entitled to do. The fault, if any, belongs to the jury who awarded that amount.
I seriously doubt anyone here would turn down that amount if offered.
My only thought is that the award was excessive. Prisoners who are wrongly jailed for years and years don't get much, and I'd argue the hell they go through for all those years spent in prison is much worse than what she's gone through.
I can't and won't fault her though, she followed the rules of the law and did what she's legally entitled to do. The fault, if any, belongs to the jury who awarded that amount.
I seriously doubt anyone here would turn down that amount if offered.
