It appears this is the case, hostile takeover.@MarkDice He turned down the board seat so that he can pursue a hostile takeover. Joining the board would have limited the amount of stock he could own and would have tied his hands any many other ways with the SEC. He does not need 51% for control.
Control of everything and everyone is vital to their worldview.The widely reported pervasive fear among the Twitter workforce that Elon Musk may endanger or even end their systemic censorship regime illustrates how central of a tactic internet censorship has become for US liberalism. Information control is vital to their worldview.
Ha, dude probably just put the 420 part in for fun......elonmusk
offers to buy twitter for $54.20/share. "I am offering to buy 100% of Twitter for $54.20 per share in cash,
Man, I really broke you, you're still obsessing over some stranger on the internet that hurt your feelings a month ago...not sure what elons goal is but for now disrupt the queers
all those fags , like bozzie, in twitters san francisco office are all fucked up
over this ..
elon and dorsey arre partnering on that mining corp in texas
elon knows wexactly how to turn the tables on those faggots at twitter
People are slowly realizing EVs are junk and one of the biggest environmental hazards in the making. Elon is reading the tea leaves and getting ahead of that curve.That is quite the pivot for Elon though, in the big picture sense. Basically made the lions share of his $ on the gov't grifts like climate change with the EVs and even the corrupt solar city deal. Now he's a conservative firebrand in many ways.